Viser opslag med etiketten Clinton. Vis alle opslag
Viser opslag med etiketten Clinton. Vis alle opslag

tirsdag den 29. november 2016

Zombie World

         Warning - some of the footage is extremely graphic NB! Some of the footage is HD - so remember to select 1080 resolution

By ChaosNavigator
When we talk about compassion we talk in terms of being kind. But compassion is not so much being kind; it is being creative [enough] to wake a person up
- Chogyam Trungpa


I took the liberty to edit and use Moby's excellent animation footage from his new video ( 'Are You Lost In The World Like Me' performed by Moby & The Void Pacific Choir, ) as an intro to this piece and picked Peter Gabriel's song 'Milgram's 37', since I find it perfectly fitting for Moby's visual theme, as well as Gabriel's lyrics - it fits as complementary perfect visuals to the atmosphere in Moby's video as well.

Milgram's 37 (We Do What We're Told) references the experiment on obedience carried out by American social psychologist Stanley Milgram, intended as a reference to the obedience citizens show to dictators during times of war. Marotta's drums on the song were said to resemble "a heartbeat heard from the womb"

The second part after the intro is 'Signal to Noise', with Peter Gabriel  & Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, the one and only version before Khan died. 

The video speaks for itself - suffice to say that it's a clarion call (just like the lyrics) for discernment and vigilance in the midst of deadly misguided blind obedience, rampant mindless hedonism, apathy, destruction and chaos on this planet. The depiction in the video is extremely poor compared to the complexity and radicality of what's going on (so it's not indulgence, on the contrary [1])

It took 12 hours of intense work to do this nitty-gritty video with minute detailed sound and picture synchronizations, speed adjustments, effects, and much editing in general in both footage material and music.


Film material (from the top of my head): Moby & The Void Pacific Choir, ( 'Are You Lost In The World Like Me'). 'They Live', 'Terminator', 'Lost Highway',  'Koyannisqatsi', 'Knowing', 'Timescapes', Pearl Jam ('Do The Evolution'), 'DMT - The Spirit Molecule', and various documentary and news footage, Live Leak, and much more, etc. The text is fast and not intended to follow one's reading speed (you gotta stop it if you want to break the continuity the first time)



                                                _____________________
                

Milgram's 37
We do what we're told
We do what we're told
We do what we're told
told to do 

We do what we're told
We do what we're told
We do what we're told
told to do 

O
ne doubt

One voice
One war
One truth

One dream...




                                                  Signal to Noise
You know the way that things go
When what you fight for starts to fall
And in that fuzzy picture
The writing stands out on the wall
So clearly on the wall

Send out the signals deep and loud

And in this place, can you reassure me
With a touch, a smile - while the cradle's burning
All the while the world is turning to noise
Oh the more that it's surrounding us
The more that it destroys
Turn up the signal
Wipe out the noise

Send out the signal deep and loud

Man I'm losing sound and sight
Of all those who can tell me wrong from right
When all things beautiful and bright
Sink in the night
Yet there's still something in my heart
That can find a way
To make a start
To turn



Live version (the studio version used the recording from the live performance): Signal to Noise Peter Gabriel & Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan Live at VH1 Honors 1996 Los Angeles


[1] In one of the most profound and revolutionary books published (called "Presence") there is a series of dialoques which is drawing on the wisdom and experience of 150 scientists, social leaders and entrepreneurs - the four authors Peter Senge, C. Otto Scharmer, Joseph Jaworski and Betty Sue Flowers (highly proficient intuitive pioneers and experienced leaders in organisational global change strategies themselves) are discussing the dangers facing humanity and the imminent need for societal and psychological change.

In the book there is a passage dealing with what the authors call "The Requiem Scenario", originally a term from an article called "Global Requiem" written by a senior adviser to the J. Paul Getty Trust. The article asks what would happen if we started to realize that humankind might not overcome these problems, that we might not develop a sustainable society – that the human race might perish.


In the dialoque bewteen the four authors they tend to agree that such scenarios evoke fear and that this sort of fear is usually met by denial or simply makes us feel hopeless. Nonetheless they agree upon that imagining negative futures can actually open people up and that such scenarios can make people think about a future that they’ ve ignored or denied, that "if people really believed we could be headed for extinction, we would do collectively what many people do individually when they know they may actually die.....if we could face our collective mortality and simply tell the truth about the fear, rather than avoiding it something would shift"

mandag den 14. november 2016

Trump som Deep State Kontrolleret Opposition


Af ChaosNavigator

The terrorists attacks which will be launched in the United States will be blamed upon middle eastern religious fanatics, Christian fundamentalists, white supremacists, Patriots, or Militias. A more immediate result of these operations will be the increased use of military forces, weaponry, and equipment such as tanks and armored personnel carriers in civilian law enforcement, the suspension or elimination of Habeas Corpus, the elimination of jury trials, the attempted disarming of the American People, and the institution of martial law with show-trials conducted by a tribunal of judges.
- William Cooper, 1998 (killed by the US Government 2001), ex-member of the Office of Naval Security and Intelligence

Update: Rygter svirrer nu om, at John Bolton snarligt vil blive udnævnt som Secretary of State. I så fald er Trump kontrolleret opposition, og befolkningen bedraget Big Time. Bolton er Israel's mand, CFR, en hardliner Neocon. en katastrofe - forvent angreb mod Iran og Syrien (nøjagtigt som også Killary Clinton ønsker det).
"..at the rally in Paris, John Bolton, Rudy Giuliani, and Newt Gingrich were also present, pledging support to the terrorist organization – side-by-side a government admittedly arming Al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria and Iraq...Those who think “Trump” is going to “change” anything find themselves precisely where liberals were in the wake of Obama’s victory in 2008. Despite evidence suggesting otherwise, the temptation to believe in “hope and change” led to an increasing indulgence in denial and excuses until liberals found themselves passionately defending policies they had once marched in the streets in opposition to during the Bush administration."
- http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-trump-administrations-alternative-right-the-swamp-deepens/5557062


Meet the New Boss - Same as the Old Boss.

Dette er ikke en artikel som mange oplyste (dissidenter, 'konspirationsteoretikere', etc.) ønsker at læse - desillusioneringen er uacceptabel. I denne artikel får du et perspektiv, som du ikke får på 1. og 2. etage (se om det 3. narrativ forneden), men som derimod er et ekstremt sjældent perspektiv i DK.


Den opvågnede befolkning skulle have en kandidat, som kunne repræsentere (copy-cat) befolkningens ændrede synspunkter, elitens indså, at befolkningens frustration med Clnton's ekstreme korruption, Obama's upopularitet, Wall Street, etc. var for stor - men er Trump ægte eller er han kontrolleret opposition? Er de sociale videnskaber på spil i en sådan grad, at de har aflæst sindelagsændringen i befolkningen i USA, og kanaliserer den i form af Trump som kontrolleret opposition? Ved enten at have sat ham ind eller tilladt hans popularitet at vinde, da de droppede Clinton i slutspurten, for at mainstreammedierne ikke skulle miste al troværdighed.
Man kan aflæse det her: Uden fortilfælde har New York Times fremsat en offentlig undskyldning og indrømmelse af uærlig journalistik i dækningen af Trump.


To the point:

Tese: Trump er blot sat ind i spillet - til at

1) fejle som en uvidende Manchurian kandidat, en figur som vil blive styret (eller styres allerede) 
2) som et nyt face-off face-on mask moment. Et nyt bad Bush > good Obama moment - med efterfølgende Obama Stockholmsyndrom.

Ny svingdør: Obama > Trump. Trump Stockholmsyndrom?



  Obama var værre end Bush, og handlede i forlængelse af ham - noget som Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, John Pilger, Naomi Wolf, og mange andre indså meget tidligt - kun meget lidt refleksive mennesker har ikke indset det endnu.


Med marketing brand successen, Obama, er sådanne teknikker a la Tavistock, perfektionerede. Næsten. Man morpher kandidatens til befolkningens sindelagsændringer i real-time ved at have en kandidat som artikulerer disse sindelagsændringer - og på hvert givent tidspunkt har man således en kandidat i elitens hus - the house takes it all.


1. narrativ: 'Clinton er den bedste, Trump den værste'.


(hvis du er blevet fanget af mainstream mediernes dækning af Trump, som uafvidende 1. narrativist, bør du starte studiet af 2. narrativet her).



2. narrativ: 'Trump er den bedste, Clinton, den værste'.


3. narrativ: 'Trump er kontrolleret opposition, og både Clinton og Trump spillede 'Good cop, Bad cop' i the Deep State perception management'

Dette er det mest usynlige narrativ.



En plausibel 3. narrativist-tese, måske den pt. bedste, og bedst artikulerede findes i følgende artikel, som argumenterer for dette 'tredje narrativ':

The Trump Ploy
'The deep state ushered in Trump because he’s clearly their most useful decoy. As the country hopes in vain, the crooked men behind the curtain will go on with business as usual. Trump is simply an Obama for a different demographic. Nothing will change for the better.'

http://www.unz.com/ldinh/the-trump-ploy

Læg mærke til de mange vidende, lærerige, skarpe Pro et Con kommentatorer til ovennævnte artikel.

E
r mange af de opvågnede nu selv i en tilstand af kognitiv dissonans, fordi Trump artikulerede mange folks utilfredshed, dissidenters kritik ?


‘A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.’
- Saul Bellow

En kort detour som eksempel: Wikileaks spillede en integral rolle og årsag til, at Clinton mistede mange vælgere og til Trump's sejr - men er Wikileaks ikke limited hang-out gatekeeper?


Der er mange tungtvejende rationelle grunde, som mange uafhængige stemmer har konkluderet, til at tvivle på Wikileak's integritet, deres mange anomalier, og deres forbindelse til Mossad/Israel  - gør dit hjemmearbejde!

Som jeg skrev i 2010:

De mennesker som er mest prædisponerede for IKKE at tro på Wikileaks a la COINTELPRO  (COINTELPRO - Wikipedia) er både højre og venstre: Information og Berlingske, Politiken og JP, ja, alle aviser i Danmark. For mig er det groteskt tragisk morsomt, når chefredaktør fra Berlingske, Lisbeth Knudsen, i sin tid skrev: "WikiLeaks – lækagernes ansvarsfrie hjemsted"

DETTE er nøjagtigt hvordan manipulationen finder sted - de får venstrefløjens reaktion, som værdsætter Wikileaks som en prisværdig whistleblower, og højrefløjen til at erklære Wikileaks som en trussel. Det TREDJE narrativ (Wikileak som cointelpro/psyops operation) eksisterer ikke engang på den kognitive radar hos disse journalister, aviser, opinionsdannere, dissidenter, etc. - alt imens sådanne operationer har fundet sted siden 50'erne og før. Se også: CIA's operation CHAOS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_CHAOS og Operation Mockingbird (Operation Mockingbird: et CIA projekt hvis specifikke formål var at styre medierne ifht. specifikke historier via hemmelige agenter. Programmet sluttede aldrig men morphede videre ind i vor tidsalder).

WikiLeaks Rigged The Election - ASSANGE MOSSAD PIED PIPER
(VIDEO - You Tube, 9. november 2016)

I 2014 blev en lov vedtaget i USA, som gjorde det lovligt for staten at propagandere overfor befolkningen, med andre ord opfinde fiktive historier og vinkler med det formål at påvirke befolkningen i en bestemt retning


Wikileaks-historien illustrerer bl.a. hvordan både højre og venstre agerer, som intenderet af The Deep State. På samme måde er Trump en analogisk operation.

Blot fordi Jens Jensen ikke selv kan forestille sig denne grad af sofistikering, djævelsk udspekulerthed, kompleksitet, - qua hans egen godhjertethed,  blåøjethed og uvidenhed -  fejlbedømmer han en sådan mulighed som utænkelig (selvom sådanne operationer er travesti og standard for efterretningstjenester - oh, the irony -
Spørg John Young fra Cryptome, medstifter og hård kritiker af Wikileaks.) - nøjagtigt som The Deep State og Mossad ønsker det.


På dansk
: The Deep State


Trumps kabinetudnævnelser vil afsløre snart, om nogen forandring overhovedet er på vej.
Selv hvis Trump har noget ægte i sig på befolkningens vegne - på trods af hans indlysende fejlbarligheder - er han truet af the Deep State, endda selvom The Deep State kan være i intern splittelse, om hvilken mafiøs faktion skal sidde på magten? Se fodnote [1]

Trump vil ikke forfølge Clinton for hendes indlysende kriminelle handlinger - et U-turn i forhold til hans tidligere udtalelser (se video foroven) - 'nasty woman', 'criminal people', etc.

Graverende 180 drejning -
Trump om Clinton, 60 Minutes:
"They’re, they’re good people. I don't want to hurt them."-President-elect Trump: "I don't want to hurt the Clintons, they are good people" 60 Minutes
Donald Trump shifts position on Obamacare in 60 Minutes interview
Man kan - som med Obama - Stockholmsyndromistisk argumentere for, at Trump spiller gode miner til slet spil, at han f.eks. ikke kan forfølge Clinton af frygt for forværring af uroligheder, Californiens og andre staters trussel om løsrivelse, at han heller ikke kunne lufte skepsis om 9/11 i det offentlige rum, af frygt for at fremmedgøre 'the sheeple', og pga. den selvsamme elite, som han bliver nødt til at håndtere nu, at han ikke kan foretage for radikale hensigtserkløringer om mange ting, som vil være løftebrud  (læg dog mærke til, at det var Neocons, som applauderede Obama's krigshandlinger, så snart han fik magten, inkl. Cheney, m.fl.).

Trumps kabinet kandidater er i øvrigt Neocons, CFR, Skull & Bones, TLC, etc. Om han vil vælge dem, vil vise hans kort..
presset eller ej.

Det ser ikke godt ud foreløbigt (men giver god mening i forhold til tesen om kontrolleret opposition, idet Clintons kabinet ville være fyldt af de samme Neocons, CFR, Zionazis, etc.):

Meet the Neocons, 9/11 Criminals and Goldman Bankers On Team Trump
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Meet_the_Neocons%2C_911_Criminals_and_Goldman_Bankers_On_Team_Trump/55231/0/38/38/Y/M.html
Trump Pals Around with George Soros
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/02/trump-pals-around-with-george-soros


Donald Trump and the Dangers of Expectation

http://www.globalresearch.ca/donald-trump-and-the-dangers-of-expectation/5556552
Trump predicted to tap mastermind of Bush torture program as CIA chief
https://www.rt.com/usa/366655-trump-cia-torture-program/
Trump’s Vice President Mike Pence Wants War against Syria and Russia?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/trumps-vice-president-mike-pence-wants-war-against-syria-and-russia/5556752

Trump ruller ikke pludseligt 70 års (eller hundreder af års) Deep State og Zionisme tilbage som én mand.

Et citat i denne uge fra en veteran som har oplevet amerikansk politik indefra som kongresmand og tidligere præsidentkandidat, Ron Paul:
“But quite frankly there is an outside source which we refer to as the 'deep state' or the 'shadow government'. There is a lot of influence by people which are actually more powerful than our government itself, our president,”
- World Exclusive, 11. november, Trump should resist neocon & shadow gov’t influence to justify people’s hopes – Ron Paul to RT

Dyret som har opereret fra skyggerne i lang tid, er trængt af den globale opvågnen, gemmer sig i mørket, og er farligst, når det er trængt i krogene - vil trække så mange med i faldet for at realisere dets psykopatiske version af NWO.

Mange af protesterne mod Trump er arrangerede af George Soros
Del & Hersk perception management, hvor polariserede synspunkter mellem "venstre" og "højre" i befolkningen er kontrolleret kaos management?
Kursen er og har været krig og en global centralisering, fjernelsen af retten til at bære våben (2. amendment), etc. Trump bekræfter dog, at the 2. amendment er urørlig, foreløbigt en god ting.


Noget meget, meget stort er på vej a la Mother of all false flags (biologisk/nukleart/etc), økonomisk sammenbrud, og  krigshandlinger udvides voldsomt, undtagelsestiltand, etc. Blandt nogle af de som vågnede først, har de fleste hørt det og forventet det i mange år; "ulven kommer, ulven kommer". Mange er desensitiverede af samme grund, men... en dag kommer ulven....

Med en (false flag) terroraktion i USA (udført af dele af amerikanske efterretningstjenester) vil synderne [læs:syndebukke] blive udpegede (Syrien, Iran, Rusland, etc.), og folket vil derfor være mere tilbøjelige til at acceptere Trump's svar i form udvidede krigshandlinger, undtagelsestilstand, gengældelsesangreb, etc. selvom disse handlinger er eksakt identiske med Clinton's linje - og pga. den enorme bølge af folkeligt håb og tillid til Trump, vil folk følge den samme linje, som de ellers ikke ville acceptere, hvis Clinton/Obama havde gjort det samme. 
 

Eller worst-case scenario: Trump kan blive henrettet, dersom han ikke handler i Israels interesser, synderen vil blive udpeget, og krigshandlinger, undtagelsestilstand, gengældelsesangreb, etc. vil derfor blive langt mere accepteret af den folkelige opinion, hvis raseri og hævntørst over Trump's død, som var deres lys og håb imod The Deep State, vil 'legitimere' Obama's eller Trump's substitut's krigshandlinger, undtagelsestilstand, frihedsrettigheder suspenderet i endnu højere grad, etc. - selvom disse er på linje med Clinton's og Obama's intention (puppets of The Deep State). Obama kan blive henrettet, hvorved Obama-administrationen kan blive ved magten. Det samme gælder ved enhver grund til åbenlys undtagelsestilstand.

I begge tilfælde vil Neocons og Zionisterne have opnået deres mål. Alt sammen manipuleret - courtesy of The Deep State!


Har The Deep State indgået et kompromis pga intern uenighed og frygt for civil opstand, hvorfor linjen nu er anderledes, Obama pludselig trækker sin support til Al-Qaeda, etc.? Dette er den mindre negative tolkning. Se fodnote [2]


Har aldrig oplevet så megen tolkningsforvirring blandt the Truth/Justice/Freedom/Alternative media - det er nu (igen), at skelnevnen og sand info er behøvet mere end nogensinde samtidigt som disinfo agents og disinformationen er på sit højeste.

Mens vi 'venter' på det næste mega monster mindfuck af masserne, må man gøre sin research og være ekstra årvågnen på jagt efter modsigelser, anomalier, etc. og sprede ordet om hvad man finder...

Dette er en intro til kommende bullet points, som forhåbentlig ikke vil validere ovenstående.

Hold the line, spread the word...

_________________________________________

Fodnoter
Udvalgte kommentarer til The Trump Ploy

 fra
http://www.unz.com/ldinh/the-trump-ploy :

[1] 

The empire is in crisis. It has looted itself to such an extent that serious divisions have arisen. The neocons want to double down while the realists look to a partial withdrawal from empire. They see a rebuilding as necessary. The empire entered a period of hubris post 1989 and forgot to monitor its main rivals ie. Russia and China. It also drove these rivals into each other’s arms, when Russia is culturally very Europe-oriented. Looting reached a point where America had fallen one or more generations behind in the quality of key lethal weapons and transportation systems for those weapons. Because the miltary is weak and the debts are piling up it can no longer maintain empire, enforce the dictates of Wall Street, the expansionism of Israel or attend to the wishes of a lucrative customer – Saudi Arabia. Hence the crisis.

The realists are old WASPs who resent what they see as a Zionist takeover which is now threatening their very existence. Clinton of course represents the neocons while Trump is the realist candidate. That the rebellion goes deeper and wider than many had imagined can be seen both in the power of the alt right in alternative media and the election results. The alt right is correct on foreign policy and entirely wrong about what is wrong with the country. The problem is not too much government or “socialism” (give us a break!) but too much Wall Street.

As the Zionists control the established media in its entirety the attempt to crush Trump was genuine. The problem was that, like Rambo in his field, Trump is a first-class practitioner of media. As the campaign reached its climax Trump began to sound more presidential – was he getting quality advice? When the FBI director decided to reopen investigations into Clinton at a very critical point in the election process he could not have done so without some heavy muscle behind him. The neocon Zionists will try to control Trump through old foxes like Bolton while the realists will attempt to block that influence.

Trump is far too powerful, wealthy and egocentric to be easily controlled. As Mr Unz says he’s a loose cannon. But he is far smarter and stronger than W. Sanders would have been much easier to deal with. They say Sanders would have been better against Trump. No. In Trumpian terms he’s a loser and would have been crushed. HC, despite her considerable baggage, won the popular vote so they weren’t too far off.

[2]  "This article has to be a bad misreading of Trump.
Just two points show the problem:

1) The Establishment had such a hysterical fear of a Trump victory that it couldn’t be faked. Every financial /propaganda resource they had was directed at stopping him, even at the cost of the MSM losing all credibility.
2) Trump is an experienced high-rise developer from New York so he knows better than anyone what happened to Building 7 plus the other two towers on 9/11. The point is, that there’s no daylight between Trump and the fake official account – so he’s looking to deal with the Neo-cons rather than fight them.
Trump seems quite at home in this ethics-free environment, and is ready to flip-flop tactically to gain an advantage (e.g. abortion, foreign intervention etc.) without having any real beliefs one way or the other. For sure he’s no doctrinaire Lenin or Hitler into totalitarian “..isms” , “enemies of the people” etc.

In fact he looks more like Putin. Putin could have investigated the “Loans for Shares” looting of Russia under Yeltsin (organized by Russian/Jewish oligarchs), but he let them keep their gains in return for non-interference with his political power. When they broke the rule, there was a swift reaction with their leader (Khodorkovsky) getting a long prison sentence (tax fraud) with others being publicly humiliated.

I’ve followed Trump for years (best summary “Art of the Deal”) and he’s an active “hands on” fighter, alliance builder, detail checker, always estimating the odds before he engages. The proof is the way he beat Clinton, reaching out to every group (no Deplorables in his world) and putting in the effort , while she left it to the Establishment and the MSM to organize her coronation.
So Trump comes across as a “Gang Boss” for want of a better description, with the emphasis on personal power and valuing loyalty to himself.
If this is right, then there are some interesting possibilities:

9/11 – No investigation of anything if the Neo-cons/Zionists support him.
Wall St. – The QE game is finished with the FED forced to direct money towards infrastructure rather than their friends. Supports his base.
M.E. Wars – Also finished. Israel remains Americas best friend but “America First” = spending in the US. Still support Israel in the UN with an automatic veto.
Immigration – He recognizes the demographic challenge to his voter base, so it’s more than likely that he’ll almost completely shut down illegal AND legal immigration.
Outsourcing – Returning manufacturing to the US will be a big winner with his base, regardless of a Wall St. crash and the 0,1% losing $ billions in profits, so he’ll do it.

End result that Trump could be as popular in the US as Putin is in Russia."

Artiklens forfatter svarer ved at henvise til "Trump and 9/11."

fredag den 21. oktober 2016

Løgnen er gentaget 1000 gange - derfor tror folk på den



by ChaosNavigator

**DRUDGE POLL** WHO WON THE FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?


CLINTON
13%
103,641 votes

TRUMP
87%
703,575 votes

I am not pro-Trump but Clinton is a murderous corrupt choice in the extreme and he is the least of two evils, even according to independent voices such as Green Party candidate, Jill Stein,  and the whole media circus is manipulated and rigged BIG time. It is superb case study in the mainstream media manipulation going on for ages. Trump might even be controlled opposition in worst case.



Trump vs Clinton: Choose Your Poison





BUSTED - The election IS rigged

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpLAzAZXi2A






Trump Unchained, “Distorted Media Pushing Crooked Hillary”
When was the last time the media threw 100% of its support behind one party’s presidential candidate? What does that say about the media?

Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.globalresearch.ca/rigged-elections-are-an-american-tradition/5552347


Analyst: Election Rigging Is An American Tradition
http://investmentwatchblog.com/analyst-election-rigging-is-an-american-tradition/

THIS is What Happens When You Tell the Truth About Hillary on MSM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0_zOgLlWHM&feature=em-share_video_user

SUNY professor says Trump win at least 87 percent certain; other polls 'bunk'
http://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/10/helmut_norpoth_donald_trump_victory.html



IT FINALLY HAPPENED! LOOK HOW BERNIE SANDERS JUST STABBED HILLARY CLINTON IN THE BACK…



WIKILEAKS on CLINTON: Best of the worst: Here are the most shocking WikiLeaks #Podesta emails so far http://on.rt.com/7sk9


CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong


RT Crosstalk: Media lynching?
A public lynching or a corporate media coup d'etat? There is no doubt the two major candidates running for the US presidency are deeply flawed. However, the liberal media prefers to spend most of the time attacking Donald Trump, while ignoring Hillary Clinton’s questionable past.


How Democrat Strategists Plotted to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies


Hillary’s Criminal Record Suppressed by “Obama Regime”: Smearing Trump, Accusing Putin…



WikiLeaks Show Rothschilds Grooming Clinton for Presidency — Months Before She Launched Candidacy

WIKILEAKS: Hillary Took Algeria Off Terror Watch List After Donation to Clinton Foundation

Qaddafi and Hillary: the Five-Year Anniversary of Her Proud Moment, His Death


The Ruling Elite Has Lost the Consent of the Governed


Hillary wanted Clinton Foundation to keep taking foreign donations - and to find a way to move Qatar's millions for Bill's projects off its books as she prepared to run




Same Mini-Teleprompter Rigged Podium Used For Clinton In First And Third Debates?

Proof Of Hillary's Rigged Podium Mini Teleprompter - Pics - Click Here

Hillary Cheated AGAIN…Read Podium Mini-Prompter & Earbud - Click Here

Dr Frankenstein Seen With Injector Or Laser - Drugged Hillary Escapes Again - Click Here

And In Case You Missed This…She Is Making It Clear WW3 In On Her Table…

Clinton Said, de facto, She Will Go To War With Russia…By NOT
Answering The Most Important Question Of The Debate - Click Here

NeoCon, War-Lover, Blood-Soaked Clinton Refused To Answer Question
On If She Would Shoot Down Russian Planes Over Syria - Click Here


They’re Selected Not Elected – Rothschild Hosts $100,000 A Plate Dinner For Guess Who

Politicians are for sale. A 2014 study from Princeton University revealed that the United States is not a democracy or a republic, but rather an oligarchy where the balance of power and control of global resources lies within the hands of a very small, tight-knit group of people, and that these groups of people basically control and dictate government policy.
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/07/23/theyre-selected-not-elected-rothschild-hosts-100000-a-plate-dinner-for-guess-who/


Corbett report: Hillary Clinton Is A Threat To All Of Humanity
http://https://www.corbettreport.com/hillary-clinton-is-a-threat-to-all-of-humanity/


Leaked memo: Sanders team wanted use of plane in exchange for backing Clinton
https://www.rt.com/usa/353124-sanders-memo-private-plane/



Empire Files: Abby Martin Exposes What Hillary Clinton Really Represents
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV_PLCC6je



Arkancide.....THE largest older online archive on the Clinton's misdeeds
https://web.archive.org/web/20160326153417/http://www.arkancide.com/

Hillary: Keep the people IGNORANT and Don't let them know about my relationship with Wall Street.
DNCLeaks keeps giving!
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Hillary for America Raised $26.4 Million in April, Began May with More than $30 Million Cash on Hand.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]


Re: For approval: Trump supporter graphics.
[link to www.wikileaks.org (secure)]

Hillary funding 2 million dollars in a cooridanted campaign in battleground states to win back the Senate.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC is upset that their “allies” didn’t send in protesters so they sent out interns.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]


“Clinton Foundation quid-pro-quo worries are lingering, will be exploited in general.”
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]


Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016. More of a smoking gun than the ambiguous talk in the emails themselves.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]


Consultant calling megyn kelly a bimbo. Has PDF attached that says the same.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Democrats using interns to organize fake “protests.”
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

RE: Action on DNC tomorrow (Immigration Raids).
[link to www.wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC member killing horses for insurance money.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC making fun of black womans name.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC telling each other, “I love you too. no homo.”
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a “rigged system.”
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin’s office.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC discussing Hillary’s policies as unfeasible.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

$200k for a private dinner with Hillary.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Faking outrage and pasting in a video later.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

A mole working inside of the Sanders campaign.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]


$50,000 – Lawrence Benenson.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Daily Fundraising Report for the DNC.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Content & Social Strategy Discussion.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Re: BuzzFeed and DNC connection.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Fwd: State Dinner Countdown.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Some chick is angry she hasn’t been given more stuff from the Obama administration…might be interesting to follow up.
Re: State Dinner Countdown.

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Tim O’Brien: Trump’s Fixation on Inflating his Net Worth is a Cause for Concern.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

RE: May Fundraising Numbers.
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]



DNC member killing horses for insurance money.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/578

DNC making fun of black womans name.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC telling each other, "I love you too. no homo."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/425

DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107

DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450

DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776

DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a "rigged system."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806

DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin's office.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867

DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5304

DNC discussing Hillary's policies as unfeasible.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/519

$200k for a private dinner with Hillary.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17287

Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366

Faking outrage and pasting in a video later.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

A mole working inside of the Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7793

Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508

Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6230

Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4077

Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

Hillary funding 2 million dollars in a cooridanted campaign in battleground states to win back the Senate.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7784

DNC is upset that their "allies" didn't send in protestors so they sent out interns.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366

"Clinton Foundation quid-pro-quo worries are lingering, will be exploited in general."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

Daily Fundraising Report for the DNC.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2875

Content & Social Strategy Discussion.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7512

Re: BuzzFeed and DNC connection.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10933

Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7586

Some chick is angry she hasn't been given more stuff from the Obama administration...might be interesting to follow up.
Re: State Dinner Countdown.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2946

Tim O'Brien: Trump's Fixation on Inflating his Net Worth is a Cause for Concern.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4496

Hillary for America Raised $26.4 Million in April, Began May with More than $30 Million Cash on Hand.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13986

Re: For approval: Trump supporter graphics. https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/788
Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016. More of a smoking gun than the ambiguous talk in the emails themselves.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/fileid/5254/2728

Consultant calling megyn kelly a bimbo. Has PDF attached that says the same.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6087

DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20148

Democrats using interns to organize fake "protests."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13830

RE: Action on DNC tomorrow (Immigration Raids).
https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9736
 
Yes, the WRH server is under heavy attack with DOS attacks trying to block access to "Hillary the Spy", "The Epic of Clintons Mess" and "The Clinton Dead Bodies List." Gee, I wonder who would be doing that?

Se også:


'Tidligere CBS journalist forklarer, hvordan massemedierne hjernevasker befolkningen

'Journalister indrømmer at efterretningstjeester, lobbyer og reklamefolk dikterer massemediernes indhold

Mediet er ikke din ven

Internet Reformationen - den 5. statsmagt