Rudolf Steiner om Konspirationer & Magtens Loger

af ChaosNavigator

'The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.'
- John F. Kennedy, 1961

'Researchers have pointed out the heavy presence of occult symbolisms and connections within both the JFK and 9/11 events .....Why would such an analysis be important? Because in the final analysis, without knowing the culture of one's opponent or overseers, one can never know their mind and possible motivations.

- Joseph P. Farrell, PROFESSOR PETER DALE SCOTT ON THE “DEEP STATE”

Interessante postulater og citater af og om Rudolf Steiner. Disse 100 år gamle citater må gøre ham til fremtidsskuende 'konspirationsteoretiker' par excellence, selvom en sådan betegnelse er ekstremt misvisende, idet hans livsværk, alsidighed, etc. var gigantisk bredt. Desuden eksisterede ordet 'konspirationsteori' ikke før 1967 (opfundet af CIA) - så før tankepolitet kom på banen var tanker om den slags alment. Uheldigvis har tankepolitet siden 1967 overtaget manges tanker idag, så de reagerer Pavlovsk-robotisk uden at vide, at de bærer ordet i aversion som følge af denne neologisme fra 1967, sat i gang af mennesker de ikke engang kender (men hvis intention de tjener)

Steiner og antroposofi er et enormt, komplekst, esoterisk, og encyklopædisk emne, som fylder ca. 30 meter boghylde pga. hans umenneskelige produktivitet, men dette bliver desværre en meget kort 'nøgen' post med citater, for jeg kan umuligt give kontekst, så jeg nøjes med disse få højst tankevækkende citater og links. Læseren må selv drage sine konklusioner for eventuelt videre research fra disse korte fragmentariske og tankevækkende citater (specielt hvis man kender til Anthony Sutton, Juri Lina og andres research om Rusland, hemmelige historiske loger, m.m.):

"Soon after the year 2000 has been written, a law will go forth from America whose purpose will be to suppress all individual thinking. This will not be the wording of the law, but it will be the intent" [GV,p98]. - See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/rudolf_steiner_actually_oppose.html#sthash.FTtEWtdy.dpuf

"Soon after the year 2000 has been written, a law will go forth from America whose purpose will be to suppress all individual thinking. This will not be the wording of the law, but it will  the intent" [GV,p98].
- 1916, Berlin, Rudolf Steiner, p98, '

p98

Gegenwärtiges und Vergangenes in Menschengeiste' (The Present and the Past in the Human Spirit)

Rudolf Steiner, Gegenwärtiges und Vergangenes in Menschengeiste (The Present and the Past in the Human Spirit) - See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/rudolf_steiner_actually_oppose.html#sthash.FTtEWtdy.dpuf

'Using the firsthand knowledge available to him, Steiner takes us behind the scenes of events in outer history and contemporary culture to reveal a dark world of secret elitist brotherhoods that are attempting to control the masses through the forces of economics, technology, and political assassinations. These hidden groups, he explains, seek power through the use of ritual magic and suggestion........
Consider this: We, citizens of the West, see this escalation to dominate and control power utilities and strategic key regions in the world coming out of America now. Those of us under forty will surely live under its legislative, executive and judiciary authority and control. .... Steiner has no doubt these secret brotherhoods are anti-Christ and says so plainly and without ado.......the truth is most people will not believe what’s happening today on the political horizon. The forces that are at work behind the scenes are as old as the battle between good and evil themselves.'
- omtale af Secret Brotherhoods af Rudolf Steiner

'The goal striven for is to establish a caste of masters in the West and a caste of economic slaves in the East, beginning with the Rhine, and extending eastward all the way into Asia"
- Rudolf Steiner, The Challenge of the Times

"Behind the external politicians, who are just straw men, stand the real leaders (secret society members,) with the conviction that it is the mission of the Anglo-Saxons to exercise a real world rulership, for many centuries into the future".  "Anyone who is not aware of this cannot possibly understand the course of current events".
- Rudolf Steiner, Die Geistige Hintergründe des Ersten Weltkrieges (The Spiritual Background of WWI)

"Rudolf Steiner alleged that the political development of the world was controlled by small, secret circles in England capable of manipulating the instincts, thoughts, and feelings of the politicians, and of the general public as well. After the first world war had broken out, he began to say a great deal about these mysterious power centers of the West. In his opinion, these occultists were responsible for the outbreak of the war by lulling the European politicians to sleep and at the same time creating confusion among the European peoples by whipping up their nationalistic, hostile instincts. For this reason, he frequently reminded his audiences that "present-day events" forced him to reveal information about these lodges and their activities. In 1915 and 1916 he showed a map, and he insisted that he was able to prove that this very map, which showed the frontiers of Europe almost exactly as they were drawn after the armistice in 1918, had existed in England in the 1890's....Shortly after the Communist revolution in Russia. Steiner alleged that the secret lodges of the West had turned Russia into a theater for their social experiments, and it looks as if the political development in the East was a very important factor as to why Steiner felt compelled to speak about these lodges and their activities. Rudolf Steiner died in 1925, i.e. before the Nazis came to power in Germany. It is however tempting to speculate whether German national socialism was some kind of social experiment as well, staged by the secret lodges of the West. It is clear from several of Steiner's statements that he viewed Germany as especially challenged and threatened by the powers that be. When he says below that "The real being of the German people cannot perish," this illustrates that Germany was completely on the defensive and in the claws of hidden manipulators
- The Secret Lodges of the West

”Steiner even went further than anti-Masonic ‘conspiracy theorists’ such as Nesta H Webster22 and the eminent Scottish scholar, Prof. John Robison,23 himself a Grand Lodge Freemason, both of whom accepted English Masonry’s innocence of intrigue. Steiner, however, made a particular point of discussing the origins of Continental Masonry in the English Lodges. Despite its repudiation of ‘irregular’ Grand Orient Masonry that predominates on Continental Europe and Latin America, English Grand Lodge Masonry, stated Steiner, was also involved in a struggle for world power. He said the British Government was subverted by the secret societies, and that in particular foreign affairs was taken over by “an inner committee.”24
Steiner, in tracing the origins of Grand Orient Masonry to the Grand Lodge, wrote that:

'But everywhere in a different way, in many places outside the actual British realm, Freemasonry pursues exclusively or mainly political interests. Such political interests in the most palpable sense are pursued by the ‘Grand-Orient de France’, but also by other ‘Grand Orients’. One might now say: what has that to do with the English?… But view this in conjunction with the fact that the first High-degree Lodge in Paris was founded from England, not France! Not French people but Britons founded it; they only wove the French into their Lodge…

[....]

After listing the Lodges that were founded under the impetus of the English Grand Lodge, from Spain to Russia, Steiner adds that, “these Lodges were founded as the external instruments for certain occult-political impulses.” These impulses included the “fury of the Jacobins,”26 (who launched a Reign of Terror over France in the name of ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’); Weishaupt’s Illuminati and the Italian Carbonari. Although Steiner admits these began without “evil” intent (which I would dispute), they “continued their underground work in many different forms,” after being driven underground. Steiner alludes to the disingenuousness of Grand Lodge Masonry in being able to say:

‘[L]ook at our Lodges, they are very respectable – and we are not concerned with the others’. But if one can see through the historical connection and the driving forces in an interplay of mutual opposition to one another, then it is indeed high British politics that is concealed behind it.27
- Rudolf Steiner, Secret Societies & ‘The Ahrimanic Deception’
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/rudolf-steiner-secret-societies-the-ahrimanic-deception
 

'Again and again, when confronted by the many serious problems with which humanity has been struggling since the First World War and is still facing, the almost despairing question is often asked, even in anthroposophical circles: 'What can I do? What can the individual do about the machinations of these secret groups, if indeed they exist? It's all too much for individuals.' Rudolf Steiner's answer in these lectures is bold and clear:

The only defence against these things is knowing about them. If you know about them, you are protected ... But you must not be idle about acquiring real knowledge of these things."

- Fra forordet til 'Secret Brotherhoods & the Mystery of the Human Double', 2004, by Terry Boardman

I Got a Mail

by morton_h, the blogger

I received the following email, and I do not know from where. A spam mail, perhaps, propaganda, probably. But read it right, and let's look at the contents: 

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]

Fogh Rasmussen has no evidence – why is NATO silent? MH17 (pathetic criminal danish (Non)Press not Covering anything for humanity....)

NATO exerting pressure, not interested in MH17 investigation. Without waiting for MH17 crash investigators’ conclusions, NATO chief is eager to blame anti-Kiev forces, thus “exerting pressure” on the international team while providing no evidence to back the claims, Russia’s mission to NATO said.

http://rt.com/news/177708-nato-exerting-pressure-mh17//

First of all, the word propaganda or perhaps easier describable verb 'to propagate' to advocate a point of view. Behind this view can then be factual arguments or manipulative fallacies. It depends entirely on the sender's intentions and moral fiber. As much as a piece of technology can be a tool in the hands of a vicious war manufacturer, thus propaganda can be weaponized.

In these times when the kind of propaganda that intends to turn the heads of the peoples of the nations is roaring as an almost irresistible tide over the West toward the East, we simply need counter propaganda. If this counter propaganda is to have any relevance or sustainability, it must be consistent with the facts, substance and reality.

The first statement in the mail claims that the pitiful Danish press did not cover what is in the interest of mankind. This statement is entirely consistent with reality and it goes for media in the entire Western World. This condition became observable after 9/11 and has intensified every time major events that required mobilization of the press' critical sense: 9/11 itself, Afghanistan war, the Iraq war, the financial crisis, Libya war, Mali war, Syria war, Ukraine crisis (soon to be war?), and now the Gaza massacre. Absent is also relevant analyzes of corruption in the EU-cracy, plunder of Southern Europe, the North Atlantic Trade Treaty, IMF-WTO-ECB-BIS Financial Terrorism and the BRICS answer to that. No Danish newspaper has ever linked the shooting of MH17 with the signing of the new BRICS finance fund, the key proposal for a bypass of the dollar and its condition for the war economy in the postwar period. Know also that the IMF via the Bretton Woods agreements were an integral part of this financial strategy and thus part of the civilian-commercial financial machine to back up US war economy - and has consistently done so. You will not find this described in the press.

No Danish media have managed to pull the threads between the EU and IMF financial attack against Ukraine and the NATO open war preparations in the area. No Danish journalists are either able to or dare mention, that financial war always leads to hot and bloody war and what we see right now is precisely that. Either this kind of journalists no longer exist, or they have been intimidated - it is never said openly and directly - to keep their mouths shut. So either they they are incompetent or they are cowards, probably a combinaton. Holes in the machine do exist, but they are rare. The journalist Michael Jalving from Jyllands Posten - yes the one with the Muhammed drawings - has written very aptly things. But as ex-wing - meaning ex-leftist, preferably-not-right-wing and never-center-wing - wing thinking is so-last-century! - it's strange to see that the once independant and progressive (this gradiose word from the 70s that ended up as total new speak nonsense) newspaper, Information, has been equally numbskull like any other mainstream syringes.

The medias muzzled, centralized management - perhaps we should say central-fed as direct control does not always happen, rather indirect control - and / or stupidity in the West right now is scary. We are seeing a new type of soft totalitarianism that is even more specious and therefore more dangerous than the typical Pravda-propagandism in the Cold War or in any old-school totalitarian regime regardless wing. The new totalitarianism does not boots (althougt the eagerly hire people with dirty boots) if it can avoid it, and its principals, the great info manufacturers that feeds news agencies with pro-government spin propaganda masquerading as facts, does not show their faces publicly in everyday life.

The next statement in the mail is directly related to media mechanism, saying that NATO concludes without any results a proper investigation. NATO, the always obedient organ for Pentagon, the new 'Globocop', as a journalist of a completely different casting than the pitiful crowd in this country, Pepe Escobar, puts it in his recent excellent article in Asia TimesOnline:

Just read the following quote - or preferably the entire article:

Enter Globocop NATO. Barely out of having its collective behind unceremoniously kicked by a bunch of mountain warriors with Kalashnikovs, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is now fixed "pivoting" - that same old Mackinder two Brzezinski game - to Russia. The road map will be put in place at the group's summit in early September in Wales.

Meanwhile, the MH17 tragedy is undergoing a real metamorphosis. When the on-site observation by this Canadian OSCE monitor (watch the video care fully) are compounded with this analysis by a German pilot, a strong probability points to a Ukrainian Su-25 30mm auto-cannon firing at the cockpit of MH17, leading two massive decompression and the crash.

No missile - not even an air-to-air R-60M, not two mention a BUK (the star of the initial frenetic American spin). The new possible narrative fits with on-site Testimony by Eyewitness in this now famously "disappeared" BBC report. Bottom line: MH17 Configured as a false flag Planned by the U.S. and botched city Kiev. One can barely imagine the tectonic geopolitical Repercussions were the false flag som fully exposed.

Malaysia har handed out the flight recorders til UK; this betyder NATO, and this spells out manipulation by the CIA. Air Algerie AH5017 went down after MH17. The analysis har allerede udsendt. That begs the question of why it is taking so long for the MH17's black boxes som Analyzed / tampered with.

You have to be well informed in geopolitics and prepared for real journalism to follow - real journalism does not speak down, it does not degrade us to babies or old aunts, it requires something as that it offers something and there is knowledge, research, substance and intelligence behind. The style is not the lowest common denominator and in the above example. the journalist assumes that we have done our homework and know what the father of geopolitics, Halford Mackinder, has said and written about 'the Heartland', the massive area stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, the continental heartland, as the Empire, here the British, would have to dominate. Here are all the resources that were worth talking about and from here all areas in the East and the South can be controlled - North and West already being controlled. The owner of 'The Heartland' was Master of the Universe, no less.

It is annoying for this ideology is the simple fact that there is a country called Russia, and the bear's body lies asleep just there. Therefore, there is a straight line from one of the British Empire principal dogmas in the 1800s to the Brzezinski doctrine of containment of Russia and thus NATO's dirty tricks in the moment of writing.

Propaganda spam or not, it's spot-on to state that NATO's General Secretary concludes without proof and places undeniable guilt on the opponents of the Kiev-fascists and thereby opponents of NATO and the United States. And now the Brits - meaning NATO has the black box which they can ad lib tamper with. The Ukraine affair was conceived as the Sarajevo moment that both timed to the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of the first World War (and simultaneously with the launching of the Gaza massacre ...), the false flag to start another 'Great' war.

NATO just follows orders from US Deep State. No more looking back, because they know that very quickly information can leak, which makes it difficult to legitimize aggression and invasion based on black-box information that the cockpit was under fire fighters from the Ukrainian military in conjunction with hull sections with 30 mm bullet holes. There story of a BUK missile was a preconceived spin script, it hardly has the range and the resistance movement in no way possesses this kind of gear nor specialized personnel to fire it - you have to be a 12-15 man special unit to fire one of them bastards. But this kind of spin you can then get away with, since the media do not ask the-military experts about such 'irrelevant details' (it takes homework to ask intelligent questions), they just eat whatever news is spitted out of the news agencies. 

The whole procedure is just by-the-book for all deep-state governmentally organized crimes: first the crime itself and then the organized cover-up.

Gun holes in the cockpit of MH17 on the size of 30 mm projektiles fra a fighter jet. The are clear signs of 'shelling', where the metal is bent inwards or outwards wheter the projektil came from without or went all the way through from within.

Holes in the hull of the MH17 equal to 30 mm projectiles from a fighter jet. They either heeled metal inward or outward depending on whether the projectile penetrated from outside or went through and came out again from the inside. 30 mm projectiles from a fighter jet are meant for penetrating a tank!

Housing pressure of the plane fell seconds after the shots, with devastating consequences for the airplane. This is the information that is now being tried prevented to present to the public, and that we therefore have to rely on are photos from the site, testimony from the first OSCE employee who reached the spot and a German pilot's knowledge of the importance of e.g. this picture.

So now the war hounds are shouting of sanctions against Russia. What they do not tell is that these sanctions are highly perforated, it is pure tokenism. It does nor describe the impact it will have on European countries, and to what extent it would be a ludicrous own goal. What is the meaning of this kind of self-destruction?

The idea is among other things to drive a wedge between Russia and Germany. Do we have a sense of déjà vu here? For what was just the 1st and 2nd World War about? It was exactly the Empire of Envy, the British attack on its worst competitors, its potential straight men, Germany and Russia. In the First World War it was the tsarist Russia and the German Empire, and in WW2 new czars and emperors had arrived, which, incidentally, both were financed by Wall Street (see prof. Anthony Sutton's impeccable research).

Germany currently has an extensive trade with Russia, and if the Germans decide to strengthen their attachment to the new financial alliances Western oligarchy as a whole. As Pepe Escobar puts it 'exceptionalists do not do equality', the British imperial mindset exercised primarily by Americans today never allows straight men on the field and will do everything possible to eradicate composure and ballance. This is the thinking of Empire of Envy.

Back to the first statement: Is the Danish press contributing to a crime, or is it just beating the horse to strongly? Not at all, because what we see is yet another big-scale crime against humanity. NATO's General Secretary should now sit in the Nuremberg process 2.0 together with the American Zionist-Nazi neocons, Eurocrats-fraudsters, Wall Street finance gangsters, IMF ditto, Blair-Bush-Netanyahu and the gang. Incidentally, it was the same gang, who were convicted of crimes against humanity by an international tribunal for a couple of years ago in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysia ... MH370 and MH17 ... hmm, coincidence? Yes random theorists will all see coincidence, and any quest for connections of fragmented knowledge and all impertinent questions will be banned, and you will be called a c ... you know.

The press / the media is the piece of software necessary to legitimize deadly hardware to be put in place. Without total media participation, no world war. So the first thing that MUST be sacrificed is the truth. And I don't give a dime about the pitiful journalists would argue that 'they really did not know ...'. Everything is freely available today on the internet with just hours delay if you know how to find it and distinguish bad info from good. Well, isn't that what jounalism is all about?! They could start by asking studying what foreign media like Asia Online writes and then if they don't believe their own eyes because of a temporary and provoked outbreak of healthy skepticism, check out all sources and information. So as a first step doing what they actually (should) have learned in journalism school but later forgot about: their homework!

Conclusion: The media of the Western World now are committing war crimes and crimes against humanity by directly contributing to create an environment for a new World War to take place. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b67OGUsQC44&feature=youtu.be

Jeg fik en mail

Jeg modtog følgende mail, som jeg ikke ved, hvor kommer fra. En spammail, måske, propaganda, sandsynligvis. Men læs den lige, og lad os se på indholdet: 

Fogh Rasmussen has no evidence – why is NATO silent? MH17 (pathetic criminal danish (Non)Press not Covering anything for humanity....)

NATO exerting pressure, not interested in MH17 investigation. Without waiting for MH17 crash investigators’ conclusions, NATO chief is eager to blame anti-Kiev forces, thus “exerting pressure” on the international team while providing no evidence to back the claims, Russia’s mission to NATO said. 
http://rt.com/news/177708-nato-exerting-pressure-mh17/ 

Først og fremmest betyder ordet propaganda eller måske nemmere beskriveligt verbet 'propagere' at slå til lyd for et synspunkt. Bag det synspunkt kan der så ligge saglige argumenter eller manipulerende falske logikker. Det afhænger fuldstændig af afsenderens intentioner og moralske habitus. Lige så vel et stykke teknologi kan være et redskab i hænderne på en ondsindet krigsfabrikant, således kan propaganda våbenføres.

I disse tider, hvor den form for propaganda, der har til hensigt at dreje hovedet om på mennesker og hele befolkninger, vælter som en omtrent uimodståelig flodbølge hen over Vesten vendt mod Østen, er der netop brug for modpropaganda. Hvis denne modpropaganda skal have nogen som helst relevans eller bæredygtighed, skal den være i overensstemmelse med facts, substans og virkelighed.

Den første udsagn i mailen går på at den ynkelige danske presse ikke dækker det, der er i menneskehedens interesse. Udsagnet er fuldstændig i overensstemmelse med virkeligheden. Denne tilstand startede for alvor efter 9/11 og er blevet intensiveret hver eneste gang større events, der krævede mobilisering af pressen kritiske sans: Afghanistankrigen, Irakkrigen, Finanskrisen, Libyenkrigen, Malikrigen, Syrienkrigen, Ukrainekrisen (snart -krigen?), Gaza-massakren. Læg dertil relevante analyser af korruptionen i EU-kratiet, udplyndringen af Sydeuropa, Den Nordatlantiske Handelstraktat, IMF's finansterrorisme, BRICS. Ingen dansk avis har på noget tidspunkt forbundet nedskydningen af MH17 med underskrivelsen af den nye BRICS-finansfond, det afgørende udspil til et bypass af dollaren og dens forudsætning for krigsøkonomien i efterkrigstiden. Vid også, at IMF via Bretton-Woods-aftalerne er en integral del af denne finansstrategi og dermed en del af den 'civile' finansmaskine, der skulle understøtte USA krigsøkonomi op - og så sandelig har gjort det. Det finder du heller ikke beskrevet i pressen.

Intet dansk medie har formået at trække trådene mellem EU's og IMF's finansielle angreb mod Ukraine og NATO's krigsforberedelser i området. Ingen danske journalister evner eller tør nævne, at finanskrig altid fører til varm og blodig krig. Enten findes den slags journalister ikke længere, eller også er de blevet intimideret - det siges aldrig åbent - til at holde deres kæft. Så enten er de inkompetente, eller også er de kujoner. Huller i maskinen findes, men de er sjældne. Journalisten Michael Jalving fra Jyllandsposten har skrevet meget rammende ting. Men som ex-fløjer - ex-venstrefløj, helst-ikke-højrefløj og aldrig midterfløj, fløjtænkning er so-last-century! - er det underligt at konstatere, at den før så progressive (det herlige ord fra 70'erne og boomet af kulturmarxisme) avis, Information, er blevet lige så lam i roen som alle andre mainstream-sprøjter.

Mediernes mundkurv, centralstyring - vi burde måske sige central-fodring, da direkte styring ikke altid finder sted, snarere indirekte styring - og/eller stupiditet i Vesten lige nu er skræmmende. Vi oplever en ny type blød totalitarisme, der er endnu mere besnærende og derfor endnu farligere end den typiske Pravda-propagandisme i den kolde krig eller i hvilket som helst old-school-totalitært regime uanset fløj. Den nye totalitarisme går ikke i støvler, hvis den kan slippe for det, og dens opdragsgivere, de store info-fabrikanter, der fodrer nyhedsbureauerne med regeringsvenlig spin-propaganda forklædt som facts, giver sig ikke til kende i det daglige.

Det næste udsagn i mailen hænger direkte sammen med mediemekanismen og siger, at NATO konkluderer uden at der er sket en egentlig undersøgelse. NATO som er til enhver tid lydigt organ for Pentagon, den nye 'Globocop', som en journalist af en helt anden støbning end det ynkelige slæng her til lands, Pepe Escobar, udtrykker det i sin seneste fremragende artikel i Asia Times Online:

Læs blot følgende citat - eller allerhelst hele artiklen: 

Enter Globocop NATO. Barely out of having its collective behind unceremoniously kicked by a bunch of mountain warriors with Kalashnikovs, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is now fast "pivoting" - that same old Mackinder to Brzezinski game - to Russia. The road map will be put in place at the group's summit in early September in Wales.

Meanwhile, the MH17 tragedy is undergoing a fast metamorphosis. When the on-site observations by this Canadian OSCE monitor (watch the video carefully) are compounded with thisanalysis by a German pilot, a strong probability points to a Ukrainian Su-25's 30 mm auto-cannon firing at the cockpit of MH17, leading to massive decompression and the crash.

No missile - not even an air-to-air R-60M, not to mention a BUK (the star of the initial, frenetic American spin). The new possible narrative fits with on-site testimony by eyewitness in this now famously "disappeared" BBC report. Bottom line: MH17 configured as a false flag, planned by the US and botched by Kiev. One can barely imagine the tectonic geopolitical repercussions were the false flag to be fully exposed. 

Malaysia has handed out the flight recorders to the UK; this means NATO, and this spells out manipulation by the CIA. Air Algerie AH5017 went down after MH17. The analysis has already been released. That begs the question of why it is taking so long for MH17's black boxes to be analyzed/tampered with.

Man skal være velorienteret i geopolitik og gearet til ægte journalistik for at følge med - ægte journalistik taler ikke ned, den gør os ikke til spædbørn eller gamle tanter, den kræver noget i takt med, at den tilbyder noget, og der ligger viden, research, substans og intelligens bag. Der lefles ikke for laveste fællesnævner og ovenfor går journalisten fx. ud fra, at vi har gjort vores hjemmearbejde og ved, hvad geopolitikkens fader Halford Mackinder har sagt og skrevet om 'the Heartland', det massive område, der strækker sig fra Lissabon til Vladivostok, det kontinentale kerneland, som Imperiet, her det britiske, for at være sig selv bekendt skulle dominere. Her fandtes alle ressourcer, der var værd at tale om, herfra kunne alle områder i øst og syd styres - nord og vest var allerede styret. Ejeren af 'the Heartland' var Universets Hersker, intet mindre.

Det irriterende ved den ide er blot, at der findes et land, der hedder Rusland, hvis bjørnekrop ligger og sover lige netop der. Derfor går der en lige linie fra et af det Britiske Imperiums hoveddogmer i 1800-tallet til Brzezinski-doktrinen om inddæmningen af Rusland og dermed også NATO's svinestreger i skrivende stund.

Propaganda-spam eller ej, så er det spot-on, at NATOS's generalsekretær konkluderer og placerer indiskutabel skyld hos modstanderne af Kiev-fascisterne og dermed og dermed også modstanderne imod NATO og USA. Og nu har briterne = NATO altså den sorte æske, som de frit kan manipulere med. Affæren var udtænkt som det Sarajevo-øjeblik, der veltimet i 100-års-jubilæet for udbrudet af 1. Verdenskrig (og samtidig med igangsættelsen af Gaza-massakren i øvrigt..), det falske flag, skulle starte endnu en storkrig.

NATO følger altså blot ordrerne fra US Deep State om at køre løs. Ikke noget med at se sig tilbage, for de ved godt, at der meget hurtigt kan komme oplysninger frem, der gør det svært at legitimere aggression og invasion med black-box oplysninger om at cockpittet blev beskudt af jagerfly fra det ukrainske militær, sammenholdt med skrogdele med 30 mm skudhuller. Der stod BUK-missil i spin-scriptet, og den kører man løs med uanset at det næppe har rækkevidden og at modstandsbevægelsen på ingen måde er i besiddelse af den slags gear ejheller specialuddannet personale til at affyre det - der skal 12-15 mands specialenhed til at affyre et af dem. Men den slags kan man altså slippe afsted med, for medierne spørger jo ikke militære eksperter om den slags, de æder bare nyhedsstrømmen fra bureauerne.

Huller i skroget på MH17 svarende til 30 mm projektiler fra et jagerfly. De enten krænger metallet indad eller udad afhængig af, om projektilet kom udfra eller gik igennem indefra.
Kabinetrykket faldt sekunder efter skudene og fik katastrofale følger for hele flymaskineriet. Dette er de oplysninger, som nu bliver forhindret i at fremkomme til offentligheden, og som vi derfor er nødt til at basere på fotos fra stedet, udsagn fra den første OSCE-medarbejder, der nåede frem til stedet samt en tysk pilots kendskab til tydningen af fx. dette billede.

Så nu råber man op om sanktioner mod Rusland. Hvad man ikke fortæller er, at disse sanktioner er særdeles gennemhullede, det er ren symbolpolitik. Man fortæller heller ikke de konsekvenser, det vil få for de europæiske lande, og i hvilket grad det vil være et grotesk selvmål. Hvad er så meningen med den slags selvdestruktion?

Meningen er bla. at drive en kile ind mellem Rusland og Tyskland. Har vi et deja-vu her? For hvad var det netop 1. og 2. Verdenskrig gik ud på? Det var just miskundelsens imperiums angreb på dets værste konkurrenter, dets potentielle ligemænd, Tyskland og Rusland. I første verdenskrig var det Zarens Rusland og det Tyske Kejserdømme, i 2. Verdenskrig var der ankommet nye zarer og kejsere, som i øvrigt begge var finansieret af Wall Street.

Tyskland har i dag en omfattende handel med Rusland, og hvis først tyskerne bekender kulør og knytter sig til de nye finansielle alliancer og dermed går tabt for eurokrat-projektet, så er løbet kørt for vest-oligarkiet. Som Pepe Escobar udtrykker det 'exceptionalists don't do equality', de britisk-imperiale tankesæt udøvet primært af amerikanerne i dag tillader aldrig ligemænd på banen og vil gøre alt for at udrydde egalitet og ballance. Sådan tænkte, og sådan tænker Misundelsens Imperium.

Tilbage til det første udsagn: Er den danske presse medvirkende til en forbrydelse, eller er det ikke lige stærkt nok at hævde? Overhovedet ikke, for det der foregår er endnu en big-scale forbrydelse mod menneskeheden. NATO's generalsekretær burde allerede nu sidde i Nürnberg-proces 2.0 sammen med amerikanske zionist-nazist-neocons, eurokrat-svindlerne, Wall Street finans-gangsterne, IMF-ditto, Blair-Bush-Netanyahu og hele banden. Det var i øvrigt den samme bande, der blev dømt for forbrydelser mod menneskeheden for ved et internationalt tribunal for et par år siden i Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysia ... MH370 og MH17 ... hmm, tilfældigt? Ja for tilfældigheds-teoretikere vil alt være tilfældigt, og sammehænge og flabede spørgsmål er bandlyste, for eller bliver du kaldt for en k... du ved.

Pressen, medierne er det stykke nødvendig software, der skal legitimere, at dødeligt hardware kan køres i stilling. Uden deres medvirken, ingen verdenskrig. Så det første, der SKAL ofres er sandheden. Og jeg er ligeglad med, om de ynkelige journalister vil hævde, at 'de skam ikke kunne vide det...'. Alt er frit tilgængeligt i dag med blot timers forsinkelse. De kunne jo starte med at orientere sig om, hvad deres kollega ved Asia Online skrev og dernæst, hvis de ikke troede deres egne øjne på grund af et midlertidig og provokeret udbrud af sund skepsis, tjekke alle hans kilder og oplysninger. Altså som et første skridt på at gøre det, de egentlig havde lært på journalisthøjskolen: at gøre deres hjemmearbejde.

Journalistelever, der aldrig har hørt om geopolitik kan starte her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b67OGUsQC44&feature=youtu.be

A Hundred Years - WW1 In Replay

[scroll for at læse på dansk]
 

Either we are a few weeks late, or we are a few weeks early, but it is by no means neither too late or too early to make a brush-up on the most traumatic event in 20th century, World War II's black mother: First World War.

On June 28, 1914, a group of Serbian terrorists from an organization called 'The Black Hand' liquidated the two royal figures from the Habsburg emperial family. After the murders there went 30 days where people did not not notice enything significant happening. Diplomacy is often under the radar, but what people knew was that Austria-Hungarians gave the Serbs an ultimatum to let an investigation team into Sarajevo, for they did not trust the Serbs will to clarify the incident. And just briefly to hint the parallelism later to be expanded here, this is exactly what we see with the crashed Malaysia Airline in Ukraine.

A month later, on July 28th, the war started. The British were the first to mobilize. It mobilized the fleet and not the army. Mobilising these days was tantamount to war, the British mobilization an was under the table declaration of war. 


World War 1 was available to readers digestion and pleasure in British history books with the headline 'One incident lead two another' - which is the usual historical coincidence theories to be presented before-during-after a war. It was not us who started, we knew nothing, we could not have done anything, happened has happened. The war was carefully planned though by elite groups in Britain and France, whose whereabouts or meeting forum were a freemasonic lodge named Grand Orient. We see similar groups of freemasons performing in the Russian Revolution.

An English journalist named Clarence Henry Norman was in London on Sunday 28th June. He described an incident in his book 'A Searchlight on the European War'. He was on his way to work in Downtown London, and in The Strand he meets an eager man who asks him: 'Any news from Sarajevo, any news from Sarajevo?' Norman did not even know where Sarajevo was located, and the man had to explain to him that it was a city in Bosnia, after which the man muttered: 'Is it possible that they screwed up ...?'

What happened here? Later in the day went Norman over to a tea party with a friend who worked at Northcliff, which was a large newspaper chain at that time. When the news came in. the female hostess explained that '... there were some guests who had to leave early because they were going over to the newspapers to update the news. And by the way this incident was important, because it was the start of the Great European War! '

What did she just say? It was very few people who in thosedays had the sense that a major war imminent. But the German emperor obviously knew something, he stated that '... he could not say when the war would start, but he could say where. It would be after some stupid incident somewhere in the Balkans.'His intelligence had apparently infiltrated the Masonic groups from the Grand Orient. We can once again remind ourselves that the mind-fucking newspeak word 'conspiracy theorist' today has become so intensely marketed precisely because world history is governed by exactly this kind of conspiracies!, And because it is not intended that people should talk about it.

But how could this happen. Well, in the decades before the war, we have the reign of Edward VII of England, son of Queen Victoria, who as Prince of Wales had to wait ages before the shriveled mummy of a mother finally died off. In the 10 years he was king, he organized the so-called 'Triple Entente', which should contain Germany and Austria-Hungary. A subject in itself this figure is one of the most frightening characters of World History. The British empirical envy did not allow anyone to be their equal men, and the French wannabe-opportunist-imperialists were then as now quick to jump on the bandwagon. The Entente consisted of Britain, France and Russia - with Japan as the Far Eastern backup. Germany and Austria-Hungary knew very well what was going on, so they created a 'Triple-Alliance' with Hungary and Italy. Italy quickly dropped out and was replaced by the Turks, the Ottoman Empire. All this and much more the work of Edward VII.

With this frontal structure any incident could set off a European war. So we have a medieval castle (the Alliance), who witnesses the arrival of siege troops (the Entente). Do you surround a castle unless you intend to attack it? Hardly. And the attack happens at the earliest expediency.

On the other hand, the level of fear - and as mentioned before everlasting envy - from the British side was extremely high. They saw Germany mobilize and the German army surpass the British. They imagined everything that could happen. The Germans mobilized to defend themselves, the English mobilized to attack. But it might not be called that one attack, as they lost their grip on society and may discourage potential cannon fodder. Back then - as now - an attack had to appear as a defense. Before-under-after, just read your schoolbooks (or rather don't, because you already digested that shit years ago!).

Back to the present

The parallel today to the Empire of Envy is the the Wall Street oligarchy that is constantly loaded with a sense of threat from China and Russia. They scream, howl and and makes scenes. And since the agreement of the BRICS finance bank just has been signed, so they also feel threatened by Brazil, India and South Africa. As hysterical women they always confuse their feelings with reality. Moreover they feel threatened beforehand by a number of smaller countries around the world - and there are surprisingly many that now stand in line to join this BRICS initiative, which is the very result of America's arrogance and brutal, cynical assertion of their supremacy financially since the Bretton-Woods deal , by the IMF, which is triggered by just the Bretton-Woods, through the World Bank, militarily through their perfidious intelligence agencies, their aggressions / wars, culturally through their decadent cultural imperialism, and governmentally through their ridiculous / childish relation to the pampered baby called Israel , their lies and manipulations and their 'British' contempt for the rest of the world. The world out there has had enough.

War is psychosis. In Washington right now, there is a pre-war psychosis. The brain-damaged politicians are right now looking high and low for ways to crack down on Putin, Assad, Iran, China, BRICS ... countries and people all over the world who will not toe the line. How dare the world, this cheap rubbish, not complie?! Are we are now in a long-July-1914 mode? Is the world once again entered the state of sleepwalking that led to WW1? Dominating American politicians like John Kerry and Condeliza Rice and the entire neo-con gang think of this particular way: 'If we do not turn first, then the enemy - 'we do agree that the enemy is out there, right...? - becomes stronger than us! Therefore ... '

The British and now Anglo-American Empire was and is a paranoia culture, and their creation, Israel is paranoid to the point that breaks all bounds. You have to remember to ask yourself: when did Russia, Germany, China, Brazil, Iran, India ... unsolicited and without declaration of war attack and assault a neighboring country? Never! Please compare: how many times did the United States, the muscular dog in post-British-Empire, do exactly this since WW2? Over A Hundred 100 times!

The psychotics, that have made a coup d'Etat of the decaying empire, are right now looking for a pretext. The question is: what will be the new Sarajevo?

However, we must recognize that even though we in several ways still are detained in a state similar to 1914 - our retarded energy system based on oil started in those years, the sickness industry aka the pharmaceutical-medical complex started in those years, the privatization of the U.S. national economy started just with the Federal Reserve Act, the Titanic sank and big-scale insurance fraud was organized in those years ... just to name a few things - we now have a global situation is marked by a shift that does is not to be underestimated: the Internet. What in fact has taken place is a continual accumulation of knowledge about actual history. It has become considerably more difficult for the paranoid psychopathic elite to get away with their wars and their lies.

We live in the swell of WW1.

The war gave rise to communism, fascism, Nazism, WW2, the Cold War, and then we are only a few decades from our time. Germany paid war debts for the 1st World War right up to the 1990s - completely ludicrous! The cold war is currently being revived in Ukraine, and the events here have deep tracks left in the century. Nazis / fascists have occupied a government with the consent of the United States and the EU as a perfidious spearhead into Russia itself. The Warshaw Pact closed down under the agreement after the Cold War and the fall of the wall, but NATO never kept their end of the bargain and has now worked its way through Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria. They attacked from Turkey via Chechnya (they always hire terrorists). Now they do it via Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. The goal is Russia's annihilation, the old British-imperial agenda. Does it look like the alliances of 1914? 

So what are the Sarajevo moment? A plane crash in Ukraine? At that time, the agent terrorist groups for the Empire were those in Serbia. Ukraine is now flooded with terror agents, nazis funded by American think tanks and their funds. The recent plane crash is also deeply suspicious, and talking about 'replay' we now see yet another (remotely controlled or shot down?) Malaysian aircraft. But just as Bismarck did not say who or what but rather where they would trigger the war, we cannot say today for sure. Merely that the false flag will be designed to provoke either Russia or Iran. It could happen in Ukraine or even more likely in the Middle East. Self inflicted attack on Israel? Why not, Netanyahy will be on vacation that day, for sure.

And 'long July' is today a perfect time to wreak havoc in the peripheral world. People are drinking canned beer staring at either the World Cup, the Wimbledon or the Tour de France. In Europe anyway, the Americans are probably glaring af some stupid baseball event. And would they in general recognize the moment when it came up in the mainstream media? Hardly, the media has already shot their interpretation of life in a cross, and in the example Russia / Ukraine there is an ongoing massive information war against the Western citicens - which in itself is too large to be identified by people with a TV-brain.

You need to get unplugged, man!

The war elite is in a race with time. If they don't succeed this time in destroying the Western Civilisation, they may have had their last chance. As one of the master manipulators of geopolitics, Zbignew Brzezinski, recently said - it slipped his mouth at a meeting -'We are in a hurry, because more and more people are waking up'.

International Freemasonic Networks Created by British King Edward VII Primarily Responsible for Outbreak of World War I — Tarpley’s Landmark 1995 Lecture

This lecture of the American historian Webster Griffin Tarpley cannot be recommended highly enough. His explanation of one of the main cores of evil in Western history is a must for our understanding of our past - and why we still live in the tyranny of this past. 

100-året - Første Verdenskrig i replay

Enten er vi er et par uger for sent på den, eller også er vi et par uger for tidligt på den, men det er under ingen omstændigheder for sent eller for tidligt at foretage et brush-up på den mest traumatiserende event i det 20. århundrede, verdenskrigenes sorte moder: Første Verdenskrig.

Den 28 juni 1914 foretog en gruppe serbiske terrorister fra en organisation kaldet 'Den Sorte Hånd' en likvidering af to royale personer fra den habsburgske kejserslægt. Efter mordene gik der 30 dage, hvor folk ikke så noget særligt ske. Diplomati er ofte under radaren, men hvad folk vidste var, at Østrig-Ungar'erne stillede serberne et ultimatum om at lukke et undersøgelseshold ind, for de stolede ikke på serbernes vilje til at klarlægge hændelsen.

En måned senere, den 28 juli, startede så krigen. Briterne var de første til at mobilisere. De mobiliserede flåden og ikke hæren. Mobilisering i disse dage var ensbetydende med krig, så briternes mobilisering var en under bordet krigserklæring.

1. Verdenskrig var ikke, som der står til læsernes fordøjelse og fornøjelse i britiske historiebøger (Readers Digest) 'One incident lead to another' - altså de gængse historiske tilfældighedsteorier, der lægges frem før-under-efter en krig. Det var ikke os, der startede, vi vidste intet, vi kunne intet have gjort, sket er sket. Krigen var nøjeplanlagt af elitære grupper i England og Frankrig, hvis tilholdsted eller mødeforum bla. var frimurerlogen ved navn Grand Orient.

En engelsk journalist ved navn Clarence Henry Norman befandt sig i London søndag d. 28 juni. Han beskrev hændelsen i sin bog 'A Searchlight on the European War'. Han var på vej til sit arbejde i Downtown London og i The Strand møder han en ivrig mand, der spørger ham: 'Er der noget nyt fra Sarajevo, er der noget nyt fra Sarajevo?'Norman anede ikke engang, hvor Sarajevo lå, og manden måtte forklare ham, at det var en by i Bosnien, hvorefter manden mumlede: 'Er det muligt, at de fuckede det up ...?'

Hvad skete der her? Senere på dagen gik Norman over til et teselskab hos en ven, der arbejdede ved Northcliff, der var en stor aviskæde dengang. Da nyheden tikkede ind, forklarede den kvindelige værtinde, at '...der var en del folk, der måtte gå tidligt for de skulle over på aviserne for at opdatere nyhederne. Og i øvrigt var denne hændelse vigtig, for den var jo starten på den Store Europæiske Krig - The Great War!'

Hvad sagde hun lige der? Det var meget få mennesker, der på det tidspunkt havde den mening, at der en storkrig på trapperne. Men den tyske kejser vidste åbenbart noget, for han udtalte, at '... han ikke kunne sige, hvornår krigen startede, men han kunne sige hvor. Det ville blive efter en eller anden tåbelig hændelse et sted på Balkan.' Hans efterretningsvæsen havde åbenbart infiltreret disse frimurergrupper fra Grand Orient. Vi kan endnu en gang minde os selv om, at det mind-fuckende newspeak-ord 'konspirationsteoretiker' i dag er blevet så intenst markedsført, netopfordi verdenshistorien er styret af den slags konspirationer!, og fordi det ikke er meningen, at mennesker skal tale om det.

Men hvordan kunne det finde sted. Well, i årtierne forinden regerede Edward VII i England, søn af dronning Victoria, der som Prins af Wales måtte vente evigheder før den indtørrede mumie af en mor endelig kreperede. I de 10 år, han var konge, organiserede han den såkaldte 'Tripple Entente', der skulle inddæmme Tyskland og Østrig-Ungarn. I det hele taget er denne figur en af de mest skræmmende personer i verdenshistorien, overhovedet! Det britiske misundelsesimperium tillod ikke nogen at være deres ligemænd, og de franske wannabe-opportunist-imperialister var dengang som i dag ikke sene til at hoppe med på vognen. Ententen bestod af England, Frankrig og Rusland - med Japan som fjernøstlig backup. Tyskland og Østrig-Ungarn vidste meget vel, hvad der var i gang, så de skabte en 'Tripple-Alliance' med Ungarn og Italien. Italien droppede hurtigt ud og blev erstattet af tyrkerne, det Ottomanske Imperium. Alt sammen og meget mere Edward VII's værk.

Med denne frontale konstruktion kunne enhver hændelse udløse en europæisk krig. Altså vi har en middelalderborg (Alliancen), hvor der ankommer belejringstropper (Ententen). Omringer man en borg, medmindre man har tænkt sig at angribe den? Næppe. Og angrebet sker ved førstkommende belejlighed.

På den anden side var niveauet af frygt - og som før nævnt misundelse - fra briternes side extremt højt. De så Tyskland mobilisere og den tyske hær overgå den britiske. De forestillede sig alt muligt, som ikke måtte ske. Tyskerne mobiliserede for at forsvare sig, Englænderne mobiliserede for at angribe. Men det måtte ikke hedde sig, at man angreb, for så mistede man grebet om befolkningen og den potientielle kanonføde. Dengang - som nu - skulle et angreb fremstå som et forsvar.

Tilbage til nutiden
Parallellen i dag er Wall-Street-oligarkiet, der er konstant loaded med en følelse af trussel fra Kina og Rusland. De skriger, hyler og skaber sig. Og siden aftalen om BRICS-finansieringbanken lige er underskrevet, så føler de sig også truet fra Brazilien, Indien og Sydafrika. Som hysteriske kællinger forveksler de altid følelse med virkelighed. Dernæst føler de sig på forhånd truet af en række mindre lande - og der er forbløffende mange, der nu står i kø for at tilslutte sig dette initiativ, som er affødt af USA's arrogance og brutale-kyniske hævdelse af deres overherredømme finansielt siden Bretton-Woods, via IMF, der er affødt af netop Bretton-Woods, via Verdensbanken, militært via deres perfide efterretningsvæsener, deres interventioner, deres aggressioner/krige, kulturelt via deres dekadente kulturimperialisme, og statsligt via deres latterlige/barnagtige relation til det forkælede spædbarn kaldet Israel, deres løgne og manipulationer og deres 'britiske' foragt for resten af verden. Resten af verden har fået nok.

Krig er psykose. I Washington lige nu hersker der en præ-krigs-psykose. De hjerneskadede politikere søger lige nu med lys og lygte efter måder at slå ned på Putin, Assad, Iran, Kina, BRICS ... hele den verden, der ikke vil makke ret. Hvad bilder Verden sig ind, det billige skidt?! Lever vi lige nu i en lang-juli-1914-tilstand? Er verden endnu engang gået ind i den søvngængertilstand, som førte til WW1? Dominerende amerikanske politikere som John Kerry og Condeliza Rice og hele neo-con-slænget tænker på netop denne måde: Hvis vi ikke slår først, så vil fjenden - vi er jo enige om, at de derude er fjenden, ikke? - blive stærkere end os! Derfor ...

Det britiske og nu britisk-amerikanske imperium var og er en paranoia-kultur, og deres kreation, Israel, er paranoid i en grad, der sprænger alle rammer. Man skal huske at spørge sig selv: hvornår har fx. Rusland, Tyskland, Kina, Brazilien, Iran, Indien ... sidst uopfordret og uden krigserklæring angrebet/overfaldet et naboland? Aldrig! Sammenlign venligst: hvor mange gange har USA, muskelhunden i det post-britiske-Imperium, gjort det siden WW2? Over 100 gange siden WW2!

Psykotikerne i det afdankende Imperium søger altså lige nu efter et påskud. Spørgsmålet er: hvad bliver det nye Sarajevo?

Vi må dog erkende, at selvom vi på flere måder stadig er tilbageholdt i en tilstand, der minder om 1914 - fixeringen af vores retarderede energisystem baseret på olie startede lige netop der, sygdomsindustrien aka det medicinal-lægevidenskabelige kompleks startede lige netop der, privatiseringen af den amerikanske nationaløkonomi startede lige netop der med the Federal Reserve Act, Titanic forliste og big-scale forsikringssvindel blev sat i system lige der ... for blot at nævne et par ting og sager - så er vor tid kendetegnet ved et skift, der ikke bør undervurderes: internettet. Der er sket og sker fortfarende en akkumulering af viden om faktisk historie. Det er blevet væsentligt sværere for den paranoid-psykopatiske elite at slippe afsted med deres krige og deres løgne.

Vi lever i dønningen af WW1.

Krigen affødte kommunismen, fascismen, nazismen, WW2, den kolde krig, og så er vi kun et par årtier fra vor tid. Tyskland betalte krigsgæld for 1. Verdenskrig helt op til 1990'erne - fuldstændig grotesk! Den kolde krig bliver lige nu genoplivet i Ukraine, og hændelserne her har dybe spor tilbage i århundredet. Nazister/fascister har okkuperet en regering med billigelse fra USA og EU som en perfid spydspids ind i selve Rusland. Warshavapagten lukkede ned ifølge aftalen efter den kolde krig og murens fald, men NATO holdt aldrig deres del af aftalen og har i dag arbejdet sig frem via Estland, Letland, Litauen, Polen, Rumænien, Bulgarien. De har fra Tyrkiet angrebet via Tjetjenien. Nu gør de det via Ukraine, Georgien og Moldavien. Målet er Ruslands udslettelse, den gamle britisk-imperiale agenda. Ligner det ikke alliancerne fra 1914?

Så hvad bliver Sarajevo-øjeblikket? Et flystyrt i Ukraine? Dengang var agenten terrorgrupper i Serbien. Ukraine er oversvømmet med terroragenter. Styrtet er i øvrigt dybt mistænkeligt, og talking about 'replay', så er der tale endnu et (fjernstyret?) malaysisk fly. Men ligesom Bismarck ikke kun sige hvem og hvad med derimod hvor, man ville udløse storkrigen, kan vi heller ikke i dag sige det med sikkerhed. Blot at det falske flag vil være beregnet på at provokere enten Rusland eller Iran.

Og 'lang juli' er også i dag et perfekt tidspunkt at lave ravage i udkantsverden. Folk sidder og drikker dåleøl og glor på enten VM i fodbold, Wimbledon eller Tour de France. Og ville de i det hele taget genkende øjeblikket, hvis det kom op i mainstream medierne? Næppe, for medierne har allerede skudt deres fortolkningslag indover, og i eksemplet Rusland/Ukraine ruller der for tiden en massiv informationskrig over Vesten - som i sig selv er for stor til at blive identificeres af folk med TV-hjerne. 

You need to get unplugged, man!

International Freemasonic Networks Created by British King Edward VII Primarily Responsible for Outbreak of World War I — Tarpley’s Landmark 1995 Lecture

Denne forelæsning af historikeren Webster Griffin Tarpley kan ikke anbefales højt nok. Hans fremlæggelse af et af omdrejningspunkterne for den ondskab, vi har set i Europa og resten af verden i de forløbne 150 år er et must både for en forståelse af vores fortid, men også en forståelse af, hvorfor vi stadig lever i fortidens tyranni.

D-Day and Who Won The War

by morton_h, the blogger

Power and killings seem to provide certain
indiviuals with a kind of erotic experience

Omaha Beach, June 6, 1944, Normandy coast. Is there such a thing by this name? It was just a code name like 'Operation Overlord'. For there is no site on the Normandy coast, carrying an Indian name from Nebraska, United States, a state with no beaches.

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]

The second code name tells much more about the real purpose of WW2. It was all about the gaining of supremacy, beeing the Over Lords, a status enjoyed by the British Empire before WW1, once again enjoyed at provoking this socalled ‘Great War’ - just listen to that word! - afterwards escaping prosecution by smearing it onto Germany, where the Impere and its American branch, its naughty little brother, who tried to free itself, but was brought back into the fold again through cunning infiltration, elitist lobbying, deceptive demagogy, democratic embezzlement, false flags, corruption and manipulation ... now wanted to consolidate once and for all.

Germany was once again smashed and torn after having itself done the dirty works for the Impire smashing and dividing Europe and making the continent perforated like a sponge towards 'the Overlords', of the Empire Of Envy. But there was still much that went wrong. Russia, for example, was not smashed according to plan. Hitler and Stalin were to destroy each other according to the plan, so that the two main enemies as declared by the British Empire before and during WW1 would disappear from the face of the earth and leave it to the British. But it did not happen. Hence the Cold War, the unfinished WW2.

And it is the same embarrassing and disgusting spectacle we see right now with the updated and never ending Empire trying to revive the Cold War in Syria and Ukraine and elsewhere using their usual one-trick-pony-strategies: propaganda, false flags, lies and political demonizings, briberies, use of street Fascists and Nazis - once again presenting themselves as the brave defenders of justice. Remember still that Wall Street funded both the Nazis and the Communists according to Prof. Anthony Sutton's never refuted and highly neglected investigations from the 70’ties. The story of WW1, the Russian Revolution and WW2 is a fake story.

It is in this context that we must see the hype that goes on today on D-Day. It is part of the ongoing and currently shrill and hypocritical war propaganda. We get waved in our faces with the whole symbolism and all the tearful, emotional pictures and statements. Why? Because they god-damn-it is embarking on a new round!

The little stupid State Of Denmark, where something according to the poet is terribly wrong, is wagging its tail in the company's stores at this very moment. Let us turn the clock a bit backwards and commemorate another event, which subsequently became rather difficult to sell as glorious: the Iraq War. Lying and deception and corruption bristled on all sides. The then Prime Minister, now international war minister and general secretary of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, abused historiography as a basis for legitimizing this in alle aspects dirty war. His eagerness to pander to the big boys was outspoken, and he was then already striving for his current job. He would do anything to please his idols, the war criminals Bush and Blair. Like them he lied to the teeth on the subject of weapons of mass destruction, and he put Denmark in the unbearable situation as part of an aggression pact. NATO is no longer a defence pact or a non-aggression pact. It has transcended into something much more sinister.

We cover us today behind the large, temporary victors. Fogh Rasmussen abused, twisted and forged the story of the German occupation in WW2. He politicized historical facts to create fear, shame, guilt and hatred.

Did the Danes prefer to be occupied by the Germans? Of course not. But were we as a nation without any guilt in this matter? That’s another question. Could we just have marched up at the border and prevented an invasion? Should we have allowed ourselves to be slaughtered for symbolic reasons? Fogh Rasmussen’s statements at that time in 2003 in the ugly times of political- and media preparation for the Iraq war was far out in the swamps of reason. They were nothing but populism meant to score cheap points. They were the scheming of a cynical politician who did not shun any means to achieve his sinister goals: to get personal professional orgasm by participating in acts of violence in company with the big boys - accompanied by the agitating smell of power and blood.

In the same period severe hints and mental attacks were delivered to the Danish intellectuals by proclaiming them 'tasters'. So: they should not come and teach the leaders of the State about what could or even should be uttered about reality. Historians reacted at the time of Fogh-Rasmussens attempts at falsification of the Danish history, but they were all under the table told by threats that they should not try to put fourth their expertise and competence, and if ... well then ... All were cowed and bullied in the post-9/11-era. And academics were then as always totally easy to cow, for they are cow-scared of losing their jobs, careers and the opportunity to pay off their huge student loans and most of all: to be pushed out of the good company of academic brotherhood, which is at threat similar the the threat of life.

Some Danes this day are striving to falsify history and proclaim Denmark as part of the victorious allies. Former Secretary of Internal Affairs, Marianne Jelved, wants a museum dedicated the Danish efforts as an ally! Sorry, silly cow! but Denmark just never were allies! We were neutral before the war, and then we were occupied. This is by no means the same as being an ‘ally', and those who claim otherwise are falsifiers of World History.

Certainly there was resistance in Denmark, right from the start, and we do not forget that. When the Norwegians have had too much to drink and want boast - which Norwegians love to do - they will brag about the sinking of a warship in the Oslo Fjord and at the same time claim that the Danes just let the Germans march through the country, while those of the heroic Norwegians went to actual war. Nonsense. What they just forget to tell was that there was more than one Quisling (Nazi lover) in Norway and that the Norwegians after the incident in the Oslo Fjord begged the Germans on their knees for the same conditions, that the Danes had achieved with Secretary of State, Erik Scavenius, the star diplomate, who knew the Germans in and out, had negotiated for. But the Norwegians at that time had burned their chance after the the incident in the fjord. There is much to be forgotten when history of the war is told and dishonor is repaired.

Denmark was overrun, so to say, for the second time by the Prussians. 1864 was still in a killing mood of the nation. We also forget here that the Danes made an arrogant assault during the First Schleswig War (1850-53) by fomenting civil war in northern Germany. 15 years later we made hubris by arrogantly insulting and provoking the German Emperor, who then just humiliated and devastated the haughty representatives of German low gentry north of the border. The river Eider became the Limfjord and then the Kongeå.

Sorry, for English readers: the slogan of the First Schlesswig War was ‘Denmark to the Eider’, which was just petty Danish Imperialism. Bismarck mocked the statement in the Second Schlesswig War in 1864 by sending his troops to Limfjorden in the north of Jutland just for at show, and then withdrawing to Kongeåen, a river in the lower middle of Jutland. So a big part of Denmark was German untill 1920. Denmark was severely punished for its arrogance and deeply humiliated/traumatized. Seen from that point of view, we almost - I say almost! - deserved the German occupation in 1940.

Certainly there were Danish sailors and ships that made themselves available to the Allies i WW2. A lot of ships were abroad at the 9th of april 1940 and chose not to return. This should be recognized for sure.

But in the opinion of the blogger there should either be organized a whole week seminar for the ignorant Danish politicians, where they would have a sharp brush-up on the history hours from high school, or better yet: let the politicians exhibit their foolish ignorance of Danish and World History and let the Danish People get into the Geopolitical Classroom and get things in place. Then politicians and media people can no longer get away with lying in our faces in order to start their ugly wars-of-profit-and-lies.

D-dag og krigens sejrherrer

Omaha Beach, 6. juni 1944, Normandiets kyst. Er der overhovedet en strand, der hedder Omaha? Overhovedet ikke. Det var bare et kodenavn ligesom 'Operation Overlord'. For der findes ingen lokalitet ved Normandiets kyst, der bærer et indiansk navn fra Nebraska, USA, en stat uden kyster.

Det andet kodenavn fortæller langt mere om, hvad formålet med WW2 var. Det drejede sig om det overherredømme, som Det Britiske Imperium havde nydt før WW1, som de nød ved at fremprovokere en verdenskrig og slippe for tiltale ved at smøre den af på Tyskland, og som de og deres amerikanske filial, den uartige lillebror, der forsøgte at gøre sig fri, men som blev hentet tilbage i folden igen via snedig infiltration, elitær lobbyvirksomhed, bedragerisk folkeforførelse, demokratisk underslæb, falske flag, bestikkelse og manipulation nu ønskede at nyde én gang for alle.

Tyskland blev endnu engang smadret og splittet efter først at have gjort det beskidte arbejde selv at smadre og splitte Europa og gøre det hullet som en svamp overfor 'the Overlords', Misundelsens Imperium. Men der var alligevel meget, der gik galt. Rusland blev fx. ikke smadret ifølge planen. Hitler og Stalin skulle udradere hinanden, så det Britiske Imperiums to erklærede hovedfjender fra før og under WW1 kunne forsvinde fra jordens overflade og overlade den til briterne. Men det skete ikke. Heraf den Kolde Krig, som er den uafsluttede WW2. 

Og videre heraf det pinlige og ulækre skuespil vi ser lige nu, hvor det afdankende imperium forsøger at genoplive den Kolde Krig og starte WW3 med deres sædvanlige one-trick-pony-midler: propaganda, falske flag, løgne og politiske dæmoniseringer, bestikkelser, brug af gadefascister/-nazister, finansiel og fysiks terrorisme. Og endnu en gang fremstiller de sig selv som retfærdighedens forkæmpere. Husk stadig, at Wall Street finansierede både nazisterne og kommunisterne (prof. Anthony Sutton). Historien om WW1, den russiske revolution og WW2 er en forfalsket historie.

Det er i den forbindelse, at vi skal se det hype, der foregår i dag om D-Dag. Det er en del af den løbende og for tiden skingre og hykleriske krigspropaganda. Vi bliver viftet for næsen med hele symbolikken og alle de tårepersende, emotionelle billeder og udsagn. Hvorfor? Fordi de saftsuseme er i gang med en ny runde!

Lille dumme Danmark logrer med halen i de stores selskab for tiden. Lad os skrue tiden en smule tilbage og mindes en anden begivenhed, der efterfølgende blev temmelig svær at sælge som glorværdig: Irakkrigen. Løgn og bedrag og korruption struttede til alle sider. Daværende statsminister, nu international krigsminister og krigsforbryder, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, misbrugte historieskrivningen som afsæt for en legitimering af denne beskidte krig. Hans iver for at lefle for de store var udtalt, han gik allerede dengang efter sit nuværende job. Han ville gøre alt for at tækkes sine idoler, de endnu større krigsforbrydere Bush og Blair. Han løj, så vandet drev om masseødelæggelsesvåben og bragte Danmark i den ubærlige situation som del af en angrebspagt mod forsvarsløse nationer, som vi aldrig, gentager ALDRIG har haft noget udestående med blot for at fremme en personlig karriere.

Vi dækker os i dag bag de store, de midlertidige sejrherrer. Fogh Rasmussen misbrugte-gradbøjede-forfalskede dengang historien om besættelsen. Han politiserede historiske facts for at skabe frygt, skam, skyld og had. Hvordan så eftertiden på nazi-kollaboratører? Hvordan vil eftertiden se på Danmark og danske karrierepolitikere som imperialist-kollaboratører?

Ønskede danskerne at blive besat af tyskerne? Var vi små forfulgte uskyldigheder? Kunne vi bare have stillet sig op ved grænsen og forhindret en invasion? Skulle vi have ladet sig slagte af symbolske årsager? Fogh-Rasmussen udsagn dengang i 2003 under optakten og medieforberedelsen til Irakkrigen var langt ude i hampen, de var ikke andet end klam populisme beregnet på at score billige points. De var kunstgreb fra en kynisk politiker, der ikke skyede midler for at opnå sine skumle mål: at få personlig professionel orgasme ved at deltage i voldshandlinger i selskab med de store drenge. Lugten af magt og blod.

I samme periode blev der vinket med vognstænger til de danske intellektuelle ved at udråbe dem til 'smagsdommere'. Altså: de skulle ikke komme og belære ham om, hvad man kunne eller måske endda burde mene om virkeligheden udfra fagligt kvalificerede forudsætninger. Egentlig substans er altid i vejen for populister af den skuffe, hvor den 'ædle løgn' regnes for legitimt. Historikere reagerede dengang på hans forsøg på historieforfalskning, men de fik altså her under bordet at vide, at de ikke skulle prøve på at bringe deres ekspertise og kompetence på banen, for så ... ja så ... Alle blev kuet og kujoneret i post-9/11-æraen, for de var jo selve essensen af det arrangement. Akademikere er i virkeligheden totalt nemme at kujonere, for de er hunderædde for at miste deres job, karriere og mulighed for at betale deres ofte enorme studiegæld tilbage. Og de er virkelig bange for at blive skubbet ud af det akademiske broderskab.

Visse danskere vil i dag gerne forfalske historien og udråbe Danmark som en del af de sejrrige allierede. Marianne Jelved vil have et museum for den danske indsats som allieret! Undskyld, fjols, men det var vi bare aldrig! Vi var neutrale før krigen, og så blev vi besat. Det er på ingen måde det samme som at være 'allieret'. 

Javist var der modstandskamp i Danmark, og det lige fra starten af. Når nordmænd har fået for meget at drikke og skal blære sig, så praler de af, at de sænkede et krigsskib i Oslofjorden og hævder, at danskerne bare lod tyskerne marchere gennem landet, mens de, de heltemodige nordmænd gik i krig. Hvad de lige glemmer at fortælle var, at der mere end én Quisling i Norge og at heltene efter hændelsen i Oslofjorden tiggede og bad tyskerne om de samme betingelser, som danskerne snedigt med Erik Scavenius, stjernediplomaten, der kendte tyskerne ud og ind, havde forhandlet sig til. Men nordmændene havde brændt deres chance af efter fjorden. Der er meget, der glemmes, når historien om krigen skal fortælles og vanæren skal repareres. Scavenius blev i øvrigt selv skammeligt anklaget for medløberi efter krigen, fordi folk ikke fattede hans genistreg, hans diplomatiske jiu-jitsu-greb på en overvældende stormagt. At den historiske nullitet, Fogh-Rasmussen, brokkede sig over, at danske soldater ikke bare stillede sig op og nedskyde, er til at brække sig over! Hans såkaldte 'aktivistiske udenrigspolitik' har kostet millioner af mennesker i denne verden livet.

Danmark blev i WW2 så at sige overrendt for anden gang af preusserne. 1864 sad stadig i sulet på nationen. Vi glemmer også her, at danskerne begik et overgreb under den Første Schleswigske Krig ved at anstifte borgerkrig i Nordtyskland. 15 år senere begik vi hybris ved hovmodigt at fornærme og provokere den tyske Kejser, der herefter bare udsplattede de hovne repræsentanter for tysk lavadel nord for grænsen. Ejderen blev til Limfjorden og derefter til Kongeåen. Så var vi små uskyldige forfulgtheder?

Javist var der danske søfolk og skibe, der stillede sig til rådighed for de allierede. Forsvarsministeriet praler af, at der var 6000, men historikerne modererer det til ca. 1200. Der burde arrangeres et Danmarks- og Verdenshistorisk ugeseminar for uvidende politikere, hvor de fik et kraftigt brush-up på deres historietimer fra gymnasiet. Eller endnu bedre: lad politikerne udstille deres tåbelige uvidenhed om verdenshistorien og lad os som befolkning sætte os i det Geopolitiske Klasseværelse og få tingene på plads. 

Så kan politikere og mediefolk ikke længere slippe af sted med lyve os op i ansigtet for at starte deres forbandede krige.