BREAKING: Internet under Stort Angreb - FALSE Flag Cyber Attack

af ChaosNavigator

NB! Denne artikel bliver løbende opdateretog



Så kom dagen endelig, den dag som mange vågne observatører har forventet i årevis. Første bølge, Tredje bølge er i gang.

For much of Friday, many internet users, mostly on the US East Coast, have suffered through downed internet service. Amazon, Netflix, PayPal, Reddit, Spotify and Twitter were among the more prominent sites affected, as were many major mainstream news sources.
https://www.rt.com/usa/363705-third-ddos-attack-dyn-internet/

Andre kilder:


http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/21/technology/ddos-attack-popular-sites/index.html

When the Entire Internet Seems to Break at Once
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/10/when-the-entire-internet-seems-to-break-at-once/504956/

https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/21/many-sites-including-twitter-and-spotify-suffering-outage/


Umiddelbart har Wikileaks opfordret Wikileak's supporters til at stoppe med disse angreb, underforstået, at Wikileaks støtter er involverede, men det er uvist om Julian Assange er involveret i de sidste tweets fra Wikileaks eller om han er blevet gjort tavs, endda muligvis udleveret. De sidste par dages Tweets fra Wikileaks er i ordlyd meget atypiske og suspekte - der er mistanke om, at de derfor er blevet overtaget af en anden part.


Se også: Wikileaks Activates "Contingency Plans" After Unknown "State Party" Cuts Julian Assange's Internet Connection


Artikel fra Daily Mail er et set-up, hvis formål er, at spinne narrativet, at Wikileaks er involverede i angrebet, men Assange ville ikke bebrejde sine supportere medmindre han og Wikileaks faktisk er en del af spillet, som limited gatekeeper hangout og kontrolleret opposition. Det som er sket er, at Wikileaks' server muligvis er blevet overtaget af USA's/UK's intel som nu udgiver sig for at være Wikileaks via Twitter, etc.

Daily Mail: Wikileaks supporters 'are behind massive cyber attack on US': Website urges its supporters to stop 'taking down the US internet' because 'Mr Assange is still alive' amid massive ongoing cyber attacks

RT: WikiLeaks only added more confusion as to who might be behind the massive DDoS attack, as the whistleblowing site’s Twitter account addressed “supporters,” asking them to stop the new wave of DDoS.
"Mr. Assange is still alive and WikiLeaks is still publishing. We ask supporters to stop taking down the US internet. You proved your point," the tweet said cryptically.
https://www.rt.com/usa/363705-third-ddos-attack-dyn-internet/

 Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation
http://theglobalelite.org/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/

Måske indså Assange hen ad vejen, at han var i fare, en nyttig idiot, og skiftede derfor bane, og blev en sand defector? Svært at vide...

My 2 Cents: USA's egne efterretningstjenester angriber det amerikanske internet, sandsynligvis under dække af Wikileaks og/eller Rusland, men private hacker grupper - ikke engang KAOS (tysk hacker organisation) -  kan udføre operationer af denne skala. Kun efterretningstjenester kan udføre operationer af dette enorme omfang. Angrebene er primært  sporet til USA af uafhængige analytikere! Første gang nogensinde at internet er udsat for så store angreb!
Forvent flere cyber angreb inden den 9. november!

Forventet no-brainer efter bogen: Rusland og Wikileaks får skylden og bliver syndebuk. Belejligt som altid: Problem - Reaction - Solution.

Prognose: USA vil herefter udføre cyber angreb på Rusland og/eller kunne 'legitimere' angreb mod Wikileaks. Årsag?  Wikileaks afsløringer af Hillary Clinton, valget i USA (selvom Trump sandynligvis er kontrolleret opposition), Rusland i Syrien, de falske beskyldninger om Rusland som 'leverandør' af hackede informationer om Clinton, m.m. - og generelt er dette i sig selv et symptom på følgende; at intenetreformation har nået et kritisk punkt i gennembrydningen af løgnene, gennembrydningen af den 'Goebbelske Firewall', hvilket er en trussel mod krigsherrerne og eliten  - se  Internet Reformationen - den 5. statsmagt

Interessant tese - at cyberangrebet var en simulation, ikke et virkeligt Denial of Service angreb, med henblik på kontrolleret censur og kontrolleret nedbrud af internet:

"Testing: The Internet Off-Switch
"What really happened was much, much worse: The Obama administration, reeling from WikiLeaks, alternative media news sources, and a social-media dominance by the Alt-Right and pro-Trump forces, has taken the next step in cyber-war against its own people: if it can't win the Internet, it's going to destroy it...

What we saw this morning was a test of a capability called Operation Off-Switch. It simulates a Denial of Service attack against major Internet DNS providers (the service that turns www.cnn.com into a string of numbers that indicates the servers where the website is run off of). What it really does is run the data-stream through a set of DIVERSITY servers, the code name for US Naval Intelligence/ National Security Agency intermediate routers that are invisible to the Internet but can comb through, alter, and compromise any internet signal.

When Off-Switch goes into effect what we see is the compromise of the BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) servers that simulates a massive Distributed Denial of Service attack, either limiting or shutting down entirely traffic to targeted sites.

Why Operation Off-Switch: The test this morning was to see if, should the need arise, the major elements of Internet and Social Media connectivity could be severed. They could. The Internet was mostly blind to the real reasons (BGP is a very low-level underlying protocol so it is hard to monitor). The use of it in full operation will be to do the following":
Se resten: http://www.realtruenews.org/single-post/2016/10/21/Testing-The-Internet-Off-Switch

Anonymous: The attack that crippled many major websites throughout today originated inside the United States.

Breaking! Public Awakens To Massive Election Fraud
Thanks to alternative media and true journalism, the American voting scam has been revealedhttp://www.infowars.com/breaking-public-awakens-to-massive-election-fraud/

Timingen med  hvad Vicepræsident Biden sagde for 5 dage siden er også suspekt: Biden truede Rusland med et cyber attack! Det er første gang, at Rusland har fået en så åbenlys trussel fra USA. Det er ekstremt usædvanligt, for der er intet bevis fra USA's side ang. beskyldninger om at Rusland var ansvarlige for Wikileaks afsløringer, som pt. eksponerer Hillary Clinton's højforbryderiske handlinger, derudover ekstremt usædvanligt, at USA offentligt truer Rusland så markant udenom de diplomatiske kanaler. Biden agerer som var han en Mafia, en bølle, en gangster (hvilket han også er):

Putin on Biden cyberthreat: First time US admits such thing on highest level
https://www.rt.com/news/362936-putin-brics-press-conference/

Det samme med den amerikanske hærs chef, som i endnu højere grad med infantil patos gør det samme:
                                                
Se også resten af vanviddet: U.S. Army Chief Threatens War With Russia


Andet shit hit the fan moments: WikiLeaks Tweets "Heavily Armed Police" Gathering Outside The Ecuadorian Embassy

First Assange Had Internet Access Blocked, Now WikiLeaks Says Heavily Armed Forces are Outside Ecuadorian Embassy
http://libertynews.com/2016/10/first-assange-had-internet-access-blocked-now-wikileaks-says-heavily-armed-forces-are/

Flashback:





James O'Keefe, nøglespiller er også involveret i disse afsløringer af Clinton:

If anything happens to @JamesOKeefeIII before next videos are released, myself and Alex have the Deadman Switch to get that footage out!
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII

PS: På tide at poste dette igen fra tidligere artikler (siden 2012-2013):



4 Scenarier
Ingen kender tidspunktet, men hvis tingene fortsætter i den retning, som de vestlige krigsherrer og eliter ønsker, så dikterer logikken, at mindst 4 følgende scenarier vil konvergere indenfor den samme korte periode (den katalyserende faktor kan være en udløsende false flag terror aktion), specielt når dollarens status som verdens reserve/petro-valuta begynder at vælte for alvor. Krigens start vil fungere som røgslør for årsager, og mudre vandene, når vi når the breaking point of no return.

De 4  konvergerende scenarier:

• Krige og invasioner ekspanderer pludseligt (Mellemøsten, Syrien, Ukraine) – spillover effect til andre lande.
• Internet – false flag cyberattacks, sammenbrud, servere/websites, internet restriktioner ved lov
• Økonomiske globale sammenbrudsscenarier
• Drakoniske statslige tiltag eksekveres – (yderligere) tab af frihedsrettigheder
  

Og det forventede modtryk: 

• Enorm global modstand mod krigen og ønske om fred – protester og demonstrationer af en størrelse og omfang uden præcedens
• Innnovation i kommunikation, omgåelse af internet-restriktioner og censur, Deep Web, Darknet, PirateBox, lokale routere, omstruktureringer, protester, m.m. 
• Innovation i lokale valuta, Bitcoin, barter, selv-forsyning, gennembrud og spredning af fri energi-teknologier, solar, vind, vand, urban farming, biodomes, decentralisering og omorganisering af subsistens, fødevarer, energi, beskyttede lokalsamfund, etc. 
• Civil courage, millioner af NGO’er, formeringen af undergrundsgrupper, eksponering af eliten, protester, regeringers sammenbrud, etc.

Der er dog mange ukendte wild-card scenarier – positive og negative.

Et tænkt fiktivt og dramatisk uddrag fra fremtidens historikere – i lyset af den farligste nyttige idioti af dem alle, i konteksten af storkrig og Directed History/Deep Politics, vil i værste fald lyde:


“Mange prominente vestlige dissidenter gik langt, og eksponerede magtens mekanismer, men ultimativt svigtede mange af dem almenvellet, da flertallet af disse dissidenter ligeledes fungerede som enten tavse stemmer, magtens ufrivillige gatekeepers, eller som nyttige idioter og villige redskaber. Manges forståelse eller fortolkninger gik nemlig ikke dybt nok mht. afgørende de begivenheder som gik forud for krigene, inkl. det monumentalt vigtige 9/11, der i starten af det 21. århundrede affødte ‘Krigen mod Terror’ som påskud for invasioner af mange lande, tab af frihedsrettigheder over hele verden (inkl. DK), og med mange millioners død til følge i de illegale krige, før den store katastrofe med taktiske atomvåben i Mellemøsten endelig indtraf i kølvandet på de vestlige efterretningstjenesters endelige og mest destruktive false flags og black operations.


Mange vestlige landes befolkninger blev overvældet af de voldsomme undtagelsestilstande, flygtningestrømmen fra mellemøsten, hyperinflationen, og manglende kendskab til internet-restriktionernes virkelige årsager, og var i liden grad bevidste om, at de blev vildledte. Marginaliseringen og latterliggørelsen af et voksende mindretal af højtråbende deep politics-dissidenter, kunne forklares ved, at flertallet var uvidende om eller nægtede at tro på dette mindretals analyser og redegørelser, som andre fremtrædende intellektuelle opinionsdannere miskrediterede – eksempelvis her. Omend mange af disse deep politics-analyser allerede var validerede af talløse organisationer, akademikere og observatører i starten af det 21. århundrede, var mange mennesker uvidende om dette , og flertallet af politikere og massemedier nægtede at tro på disse årsagsforklaringer og påstande, som eftertiden nu har bekræftet som sande'


På grund af opvågningen i menneskeheden via internetrenæssancen, virker det derimod, som om narrativet i bedste fald – i en ultra kort letbenet, måske naiv version – i bedste fald er følgende:


'3. verdenskrig blev afværget i tide og tilskrives bevidstgørelsen om usandheden i de vestlige mediers og krigsherrers officielle narrativ. Mange befolkninger var via internet renæssancen vågnet op til mediernes og politikernes usandheder og inkompetence, hvilket i starten af 20'erne resulterede i omfattende sandhedskommissioner, revisioner, og reformeringer i de vestlige landes politiske institutioner, regeringssystemer, efterretningstjenester, m.m.'

The Deep State, milliardæren og gynokraten

af morton_h, aka marco_hanuman, the blogger 

Verden har et stort problem. Det hedder USA. Problemet er ikke landet USA som sådan eller dets indbyggere. Problemet er, at USA næppe kan kaldes demokrati, og at det ikke styres af en folkevalgt regering men af visse strukturer, der har taget denne kæmpenation på som en overfrakke. Problemet er med andre ord, at især udenrigspolitikken i USA er privatiseret, dvs. der findes en klike, der aldrig er blevet valgt til deres job, og som ikke tåler indblanding i deres private projekt. 

Udenrigspolitikken i USA køres af et segment, en klub af oligarker, som Peter Dale Scott har kaldt The Deep State, en stat i staten, og som kører nationen som et firma ved hjælp af mafiametoder. Derfor er det umuligt at demokratisere udenrigspolitikken. Derfor mener oligarkerne heller ikke, at det er nødvendigt at spørge Kongressen til råds, når USA indleder endnu en krig et tilfældigt sted i verden, hvor der var en stat, der som de amerikanske neocons – de synlige hoveder i The Deep State – mener trænger til 'regimeforandring', hvis de har gjort tiltag til at beskytte sig selv mod overgreb fra den globale finans- og krigsmaskine. Det mener de ikke, og det gør de ikke, og de er sluppet afsted med det siden slutningen af den kolde krig, selvom det er mejslet i granit i den amerikanske forfatning at USA ikke kan indlede en krig uden Kongressens godkendelse.

The Deep State er ligeglad med, hvem der formelt regerer landet, så længe de regerer. Derfor er deres propagandaapparat for tiden oppe at køre over, at en uforudsigelig type som Donald Trump kommer med udsagn, der går i retning af at begrænse oligarkiet, The Deep State's uhæmmede adgang til det marked, som det udenrigspolitiske betragtes som deres ejendom. Alle de amerikanske angrebskrige handler om at berige sig og skabe fri adgang for de globale firmaer og det privatejede centralbankvæsen, hvoraf firmaerne for størstedelens vedkommende har hovedsæde enten i Wall Street eller The City of London med de koordinerende organer IMF og WTO som spydspidser, der gennemborer og kontrollerer markedet. Men som den russiske økonom Valentin Katasonov siger: markedet er et svindelnummer.

Katasonov

The Deep State er i virkeligheden ikke et amerikansk fænomen, men den femte kolonne, der skal garantere, at egentlig nationale interesse aldrig lægger hindringer i vejen for dem. Så når Donald Trump foreslår at sætte en begrænsning på NATO, ikke tillade destruktiv masseindvandring, genskabe de arbejdspladser, som USA havde for 50 år siden, at spørge Kongressen før man går i krig og rette op på den kæmpe skævhed, som USA har overfor Kina grundet de forsvundne arbejdspladser, så bliver han kaldt alle de skældsord, som de liberale kan komme op med. Og hvorfor de liberale? Fordi The Neocon Gang i mellemtiden har flyttet sig over til dem i og omkring Hillary Clinton, der på sin side lover at bombe Syrien sønder og sammen (hvilket allerede er sket, så er det nødvendigt igen?), indlede krig med Iran, Rusland og Kina, lukke så mange indvandrere ind som muligt og slå hårdt ned på alle, der kritiserer hende med censur og internering i en af de 1000'er af koncentrationslejre, der ligger klar til den Amerikanske Borgerkrig 2.0. Det sidste er hun ikke eksplicit om, men det vil komme til at ske. Allerede nu er Homeland Security ved at overtage kontrollen med valgprocedurerne, så der kan svindles yderligere, hvilket allerede skete i forbindelse med primærvalget. Så Donald Trump vil ikke kunne vinde valget, for man flytter eller sletter bare stemmerne. Ejheller er det muligt at retsforfølge Hillary Clinton, da direktøren for FBI Richard Comey (FBI's notat her), har sørget for at blokere en eventuel retsforfølgelse. Bureauet er en integral og korrupt del af The Deep State og har dokumenterbart haft deres fingre med i spillet i de terrorskyderier, som vi har været vidne til indenfor de seneste år, hvor terror nu mere end nogen sinde er blevet et såkaldt legalt politisk styreredskab. 

At den dybe stat ikke begrænser sig til USA er helt klart. Vi ser den udfolde sig, hver gang vi er vidne til terrorhandlinger som i Frankrig og i England. EU har sin dybe stat og alle de europæiske lande har deres filialer. Når politikere, businessfolk, bankfolk og mediefolk mødes i deres aflukkede logelignende fora som fx Bilderberg-gruppen eller blot i deres palælignende frimurerloger, så operer den dybe stat. Hver gang der sker afgørende ryk i politikken, der medfører inddæmning af folks civile rettigheder, salg af nationale klenodier til Goldman Sachs, godkendelse af transatlantiske traktater om 'frihandel', der formaliserer globaliseringen og nedlæggelsen af nationen som garant for de civile rettigheder, beslutninger med FN's og NATO's godkendelse om at ødelægge endnu en region i udkantsverden, udplyndre de sydeuropæiske lande via ECB og IMF, støtte et nazi-fascistisk statskup i Ukraine – altså hver gang demokratiet sættes til side, fordi det er alt for besværligt at spørge folk, så er det The Deep State, der opererer.

Markedet er et svindelnummer, fordi det er rigged, der er snoretræk i det, som kan styres af den store dukkefører. Det er et svindelnummer, fordi de bliver brugt som en slags anden natur, der ikke kan styres, der er helt tilfældigt, der har sine egne lovmæssigheder, som man bare kan observere. Det var ikke os, sagde talsmændene for The Deep State, der var markedet.

• Det sagde de, da de plyndrede Rusland efter murens fald.

• De sagde de, da de havde kørt en finanskrise i stilling.

• De siger de, når arbejdsløsheden i Sydeuropa, England og USA er nået tårnhøjde.

• De siger de, når de vil prakke europæerne TTIP på ærmet, så et kartel kan sagsøge en stat, hvis denne stiller krav til anstændig opførsel (men hør, sagde Frankrig og Tyskland ikke nej forleden …?).

• Det sagde de, da krakket ramte Wall Street i 1929.

• Det sagde de, da 1. Verdenskrig rullede ud - One incident led to another, det skete bare, det var bare en form for naturlig tilfældighed, krigen er ligesom et stort marked (det er ikke engang løgn!).

• Det sagde de, da de kørte oliekrisen i stilling og crashede tigerøkonomierne i Østen i 70'erne.

• De sagde de, da de fik mafioso'en Clinton til at fjerne Glass-Steagal akten i 90'erne, der banede vejen for Finanskrisen et årti+ senere.

• De sagde de også, da IMF angreb Jugoslavien før krigen i 90'erne.

• Det siger de, hver gang de sender en delegation af økonomiske hitmen ind i en svækket nation et sted i udkantsverden – soon coming to a country near you – for at enten at korrumpere præsidenten og hans regering eller skyde ham en kugle for panden, skaffe landet en gæld på halsen via lån, som aldrig kan betales tilbage og dernæst overtage landet og stjæle alle dets ressourcer.

Det er bare markedet, siger den dybe stat, globalisterne og oligarkerne igen-igen, vi kan ikke gøre for, at det opfører sig, sådan som vi gerne vil have.

Det sagde de så igen, og tilstrækkelig mange tænkte, atså må det jo passe, siden de siger det. Tilstrækkelig mange har aldrig hørt udtrykket Deep State eller har nogen anelse om, hvordan Verden styres. Ej heller har de funderet nærmere over, at der åbenbart er så mange sammenfaldende mønsterlignende begivenheder, der altså bare opstår helt af sig selv.

Denne farvelade er fuldstændig tilfældig og opstået ud at intet.
Der er ingen genkendelighed eller nogen form for struktur.

Selv de, der har en vis kritik tilovers for den USA-politik, der medfører kaos og destruktion overalt i Verden, henviser for det meste til stupiditet og inkompetence i den amerikanske administration. De gør sig ikke klart, at denne administration ikke nødvendigvis er inkompetent, men at den er blevet saboteret og udueliggjort, og at det kaos, der opstår som følge deraf, på ingen måde er tilfældigt eller uønsket. Det er uønskværdigt, javist, men på ingen måde uønsket, for nogen har haft et ønske og fået dette ønske og deres vilje igennem.

Her når vi ikke frem til klarhed ved blot at hævde, at det er jødeslænget, den khazariske mafia, der har været på spil igen. Javist, det har de bestemt, og The Neocons render flere af dem rundt med dobbelt statsborgerskab, hvoraf det ene er israelsk. Men parasitten har mere end de seks ben, der er i zionisternes logo. Den er den hemmeligholdte struktur, som John F. Kennedy nævner i sin tale til the American News Publishers Society i 22 nov 1962.

Her er et par citater fra talen:

Selve ordet hemmelig bør afskys i et frit og åbent samfund; og vi er som et folk via vores arv og historie i opposition til hemmelige samfund, hemmelige edsaflæggelser og hemmelige tiltag og beslutninger.

I dag er der ikke ankommet nogen krigserklæring – og hvor frygtindgydende kampen end måtte synes, vil denne krig muligvis aldrig blive erklæret på en traditionel måde. Ikke desto mindre er vores måde at leve på udsat for et angreb.

Vi oppe imod en monolitisk, verdensomspændende og ubarmhjertig sammensværgelse, der hovedsagelig bruger fordækte metoder til at udvide sin indflydelsessfære – infiltration i stedet for invasion, subversion i stedet for valg, intimideringer i stedet for frit valg og guerillaer om natten i stedet for fjender om dagen.

Det er et system, der har investeret umådelige mængder af menneskelige og materielle ressourcer i opbyggelsen af en højeffektiv maskine, der kombinerer militær, diplomati, efterretningsvæsen samt økonomiske, videnskabelige og politiske operationer. 

Fuldt transscript af talen:
wakeup-world.com/2011/05/20/jfks-speech-on-secret-societies/

Derfor har den samme monolitiske, verdensomspændende og ubarmhjertige sammensværgelse, der bestilte mordet på Kennedy – og mordet på Peron, mordet på Palme, mordet på Malcolm X, mordet på Luther King, mordet på Bob Marley og John Lennon og en hel stribe politiske mord i årtierne herefter (husk at både Marley og Lennon var særdeles outspoken mod The Deep State) – sandsynligvis allerede bestilt et mord på Donald Trump, hvis han på nogen måde skulle komme igennem med et valg. Det er ikke sandsynligt, selvom han fører i opinionerne, og selvom ikke ret mange amerikanere bortset fra rabiate feminister (gynokrater), illegale immigranter fra Mexico og en stak ideologiforvirrede kulturmarxister bryder sig om fru Clinton. For nu har de jo fuld kontrol over valgmaskinen og er ikke bange for at bruge den. FBI-direktøren skal nok få forhindret en efterforskning her også.

Skulle det ske mod alle odds, det korrupte statsapparat taget i betragtning, vil vi blive vidne til endnu et politisk mord i form af en rituel menneskeofring (kabbalistisk, satanisk praksis), hvor offeret bagefter vil blive tildelt den fulde og ensidige skyld for handlingen. Han var jo rabiat, isolationistisk, racistisk, farlig, uegnet, han fornærmede folk, blabla... Læs: han satte sig op med The Deep State, han var som oligarark ulydig mod oligarkiet, og derfor måtte han dø, basta! Der vil også ankomme en ganske forfærdelig bunke hyklere. Staten vil hoppe flere skridt frem mod et gennemtotalitært politi-slavesamfund, som om de ikke allerede er godt på vej. Medierne vil kamme over i kvalmende løgne, og folk vil endnu en gang hengive sig skamløst og hovedløst til deres egen snotforvirrethed ligesom efter 9/11. Måske vil mordet blive det nye 9/11, skal få de forvirrede amerikanere og resten af verden til at sluge en hel hær af kameler.

Kennedy havde, og Trump har sine skyggesider. Vi ved godt, hvordan Kennedyfamilien tjente deres penge, og der var ikke meget mindre svindel og mafia over dem end Bush'erne og Clinton'erne. Kennedys far havde sine deal kørende med nazisterne. Derfor ville han blive nem at kontrollere. Troede man i The Deep State. Og så var han en womanizer og en misbruger af dope. Alligevel lykkedes det ham at træde så meget i karakter som moralsk integreret og samvittighedsfuld, at han udgjorde en seriøs trussel mod The Deep State.





Trump er en benhård forretningsmand, og har uden tvivl tromlet sine business-modstandere. Han har visse forbindelser til zionistslænget, bla. via sine børn. Han har bestemt ikke tænkt sig at skære ned på militærbudgettet, men mener, at USA stadig skal være stærk rent militært. Den afgørende forskel er, at han erklærer, at anvendelsen af militærmagt ikke længere skal være førsteprioriteten som nu. Han tror åbenbart fuldt på sine evner som forhandler, siden han anbefaler forhandling, bla. med Rusland, frem for som i Clinton-doktrinen skyd først og spørg heller ikke bagefter. Hvorefter 3. Verdenskrig er en no-brainer!

Det er meget interessant at se, hvordan de demokratiske stormtropper ter sig vil valgmøderne. De bekender kulør, og det måtte ske. The Liberals er voldelige. Det er har de altid være, det vil de altid være. De opfører sig ekstremt voldeligt som fascistiske brunskjorter, de overfalder, sviner til. Virkelig, virkelig charmerende. Hvilket selvfølgelig er dybt iscenesat, da det er standard indenfor social ingeneering, crowd control, colored revolution-taktik. Det er asfalten, der skal koge, når Deep State spiller folk ud mod hinanden. Det er helt i ånden i forhold til den demokratiske kandidat, der er en notorisk voldsperson med fingrene dybt nede i ødelæggelsen af Libyen og etableringen af ISIS. Læg dertil hendes emailsvindel og den bundkorrupte Clinton Foundation. En mentalt meget syg person, der desværre svarer til jobbeskrivelsen af den næste præsident. Ligeledes fysisk syg og får black-outlignende spasmer som dette foran åbent kamera. En læge har kigget på alle de symptomer, hun viser (konstant hoste, overdreven ansigtsmimik, svært ved at holde sig oprejst, rysteture med hovedet, synkebesvær, momentan paralysering, sår på tungen, latteranfald for åben skærm udover hvad der føles socialt komportabelt, vredeanfald i hovedet på en journalist), som klare symptomer på Parkinsons syge. Et lægeligt institut kommer med samme diagnose. Det kan være trigget af en hjerneskade efter et fald i 2012, eller faldet kan have været en tidlig følge af begyndende Parkinsons. Årelang drugmisbrug ligeledes. Gætterier har også været inde over syfilis grundet hendes mands omfattende sexmisbrug. Andre igen nævner, at hun er inde over autismefeltet, da hendes mangel på empati er udtalt (sociopati). En af hende kampagnemedarbejdere udtaler:

'Hillary havde skrigende barnagtige raserianfald, der efterlod stabsmedlemmerne grædende og ude af stand til at arbejde. Hun mente, at nomineringen var noget, hun kunne forlange, men hendes tilstandsproblem er blevet værre, og hun er blevet skinger og nogle gange endog voldelig.'

En liderliberal gynokratisk spasme eller en meget syg person? Eller begge dele?

Clinton-familiens personlige livvagt (secret service officer, air marshall), Gary Byrne, har skrevet Crisis of Character om hende og Bill. Den beskriver et ægtepar fra, som man sagde om dem, Arkansas-mafiaen, der har arbejdet deres vej til magten gennem løgne, svindel og forbryderisk virksomhed.

Der er blevet spekuleret over, hvorvidt man planlægger at rigge valget for at vælge Hillary og så erklære hende uegnet på grund af hendes tilstand. Ikke at man så ville sætte Trump ind i stedet, men man ville finde en kringlet paragraf om, at en præsident under særlige forhold kan sidde i tre perioder. Selv The Deep State kan måske blive nervøse ved en hjerneskadet psyko-bitch. Og nu gik det lige så godt med en demokrat, der kan forføre The Liberals til at elske krig. Men det er indtil videre spekulationer, selvfølgelig.

Global Media Fascism

by morton_h, the blogger

It is hard to actually believe for people. It is too big, therefore it cannot be. And please add this to the list of logical fallacies as Appeal to Bigness. 

Too big a toad to fathom.
Too big to feel - to big to fight?

Western Media on mainstream level is now a fulfilled monolithic corporate fascist entity, where everything is controlled by a network of global corporate deep state governance. That would mean a very few people owning a very few but very big feeding channels controlling 99% of mainstream online or printed media of the West. And the last 1% dare not go against it.

We have known that for some time now, and some have known it all along. But recently a significant proof of this being very real and not some too-big-to-fathom theory is the fact, that an article by Gilbert Doctorow in The Russia Insider as the only source titled: Russia's Had Enough – No More Business As Usual With The US, is quoting Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, giving a 3 hour long speech in the annual press conference from the ministry, which then has been totally ignored by all media in the West.

Mr. Lavrov said:

For Russia there wil be no more business as usual with the European Union or the United States. A new stage of developement is dawning, which can develop only on the basis of equal rights and all other principles of international law.

For a statement of such huge significance to be totally blacked out by Western media it takes a totalitarian structure named above as Global Media Fascism. The word fascism is not used here in the usual infantile sloppy-ignorant way that leftists and liberals use it meaning basically: anything they don't like. It is used in the strict techical term of a total merge of corporate and government entities into a totalitarien dictatorship. In that sense, the Sovjet State and the ideology of Socialism was – and is - nothing more than red or pink fascism.

As we have pointed out on this blog several times, it is most hillarious and bizarre that the Sovjet citizens never doubted, that the yellow press of the Sovjet state was lying to its teeth every single day and therefore never could be taken seriously, whereas citizens of Western countries to this day actually believe, that their corporate-fascist media is telling the truth!

Even during the Cold War a statement of such huge importance would have got at least some attention although with a critical edge. After all, those were the days of Sovjet grotesque and exagerated clichée propaganda statements. Which is another paradox, since Russian leaders telling the truth and/or making statements, that are meant to be taken seriously, apparently are regarded as far worse than leaders in those days just bragging and howling. Which again would take us down another rabbit hole with a story, of how the Sovjet state was created by the West in the first place.

So, the current blackout is deeply controlled as are all mainstream media, not just some but ALL! Some papers and stations may be too small to be able to have foreign correspondants actually going to foreign places. So they are dependant on downloading from the large bureaus and agencies. Which means, that they are controlled by the apparent lack of ressources, because these corporate mega-bureaus are 100% controlled by the media mongerers, moguls and mafiosi and their mongoloid, malevolent and mouth-shutting media maggots. Nothing escapes this monster machine, that has been bought up and taken over during the 20th century. Apparent lack of ressources, that is, because minor newsmedia have made a choice of not investigating and not questioning the official narrative, which makes them collaborateurs in the most active sense. In the serious section of the Alternative Media we can find more serious journalism produced by one man with the guts and brain to do so, than any one of those lazy, stupid and corrupt mainstream channels/papers with dozens or hundreds of employed. So it is not a question of ressources, but a deliberate choice. Therefore the Media are guilty in serious crimes against humanity for doing what theý do and not doing what they should! Without the Western Media spreading legs to the sinister forces of the World, no lies, no wars, no political crimes, no terrorism, no banking fraud, none of that would stand a chance.

Journalists of today are even taught in their training years, how to deal with conspiracy theorists. A person recently came across a paper, a manual from a Danish academy for journalism, showing how this is part of their training system! This means, that whenever someone or some information has been officially labelled, journalists are to treat is as not real, but as a crazy theory. This again means – and the blackout'ening of the statement of the Russian Foreign Minister is exactly such an act of politicized media filtering-out – that any part of the reality can be cast out, denied, distorted, ridiculed on top-down. demand. Journalists of today are trained to react to any news info with an either-or-filter. Either: the news info is harmless to theiremployers, and therefore theycan more or less tell the truth – as long as it sells of course, if not theyjust ignore it or angle it more sexed-up. Or: the news info has been classified as harmful to theiremployers, and therefore it is expected of themto either totally ignore it or lie about it. This shows on one side how emprisonedjournalism has become in the era of globalism and on the other hand how desperate the media of the West now is, knowing too well that its level of obsolescense is directly proportional with peoples knowledge of big chunks of reality, that is not reported in the media.

The Media is the enemy of Truth, and therefore the enemy of the people.

When Sergey Lavrov says on the basis of equal rights, he is referring to the right to sovereignty of the Nations of the World. This is the diametrically opposite to the both internal and foreign policy of the US and the EU. This is a total smack in the face of the whole globalist mega-project of the last 225 years, the revolutionary project of the Jesuits, the Sabbateans, the Masonic parasite, the Imperialists, the Industrialists, the Communists, the Zionists, the Cultural Marxists, the NeoCons, the Globalists, … which is: The destruction of Western heritage culture and the the Nation State. Do I hear a squeek about the Zionists wanting a national state? Yes you moron, for themselves, but for everyone else goy on the Planet there should be no nationaccording to them. Which is why Europe is now being destroyed by their organized mass emigration. 

National sovereignty is part of the Russian concept of a New World Order, which is a totally different order than THE nwo of the sick uni-polar world in the sick minds of the sick Western oligarks. A sovereign nation is a nation with permission to have its own opinion, its own domestic and foreign policy, its own economy, its own culture, its own language, its own population. And this is exactlywhat nations of the World have been increasingly denied for the same 225 years – that is since the French Revolution, where the World experienced the modern version of globalism and its ugly face for the first time. The death of national sovereignty and nation states was among the prime goals of the Jaccobin, Frankean, Jesuit-Illuminati agenda.

This is why nationalism has been declared the root of all eviland demonized in general by the globalists. Internationalism on the other hand has been praised as part of the new gospel found in Communism-Marxism-Leninism-Trotsyism. This is why it was called International Socialism. This is why National Socialism as a serious competitor was condemned and destroyed, since it protected a people and a nation in stead of destroying it like the Bolsjevik mass murderers – 147 millions in Russia alone! This is why the EU now destroys the sovereignty of its members transforming Europe into a dysfunctional Super State like the USA.

This is why Mr. Lavrov made his statement on behalf of the Russian Foreign Ministry and thereby Russia itself, and this is why all the corporate fascist media of the West were ordered not to tell about it, this being a total smack in the face of the overall globalist agenda that now – maybe for the first time since Napoleon or Hitler – like them or not – is facing serious opposition. I am willing to include Mahatma Gandhi, Emperor Hirohito and Moammar Gadaffi and a dozen of others to the list of anti-globalists, of which only Gandhi has been officially blue stamped due to his pacifism. He was regarded as a real saint, so they couldn't crush him, although they have tried, which many people don't know.

So Lavrov and the Russians are saying on the one hand, that it according to international law approved by most nations – including those states that constantly are spitting on these very laws, conventions and treaties – to intrude and intervene in a nation and deprive it of its sovereingty. It is illegal to force regime change in a nation just because you don't like the regime – meaning the regime being disobediant and non-subordinate to the demands of the Globalist Empire and its Central Banking System. Which we have recently seen in Libya, Syria and the Ukraine. But on the other hand and even more significantly they are saying, that they will not tolerate the West forcefully exporting its global-fascist concept of dissolution of nation states tothe countries of the World, especially to the neighbouring countries of Russia by whatever means: colored revolutions, corrupt NGO'ism, Gladio 2.0 terror-operations, simple bribe of leaders of states, military intervention, proxy wars by jihadist groups, diverse sinister operations by intelligence agencies, funding of groups of subversive elements … the means and tactics are endless.

Lavrov moreover states the folowing:

To the best of my knowledge not a single report of the event has appeared on major online American, French, British, German newspaper portals or on television channels.

This was not for the lack of substance or newsworthy soundbytes including the headline 'No Business As Usual'. As the sharp tongue, Russian commentor, Maria Sakharov pointed out not long ago due to a similar press briefing: What are all these accredited Western reporters doing in Moscow if nothing gets published abroad? Do they have some other occuption?

The answer is quite simple, though still surprising to most people. Socalled journalists of major Western Media are no longer journalists, but agents for the intelligence services. As the German editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine, the leading German newspaper, Udo Ulfkotte, has pointed out: Me and my colleagues during the Cold War and beyond have been used by the CIA to feed the German readers with their propaganda. Former chief editor of the leading Danish newspaper, Politiken, was a Mossad agent. So either: the appointed rapporters at the Moscow briefings were not real journalists at all, but agents of the intelligence services. Or: they were, in principle, journalists, but their rapports were never used as expected as news rapports meant for publishing, but as intelligence rapports meant for the Agency in the time of war, which we are in, which would be: The Theatre of Third World War.

The Russian Foreign Minister is exposing the hypocracy of the Western Media, that deliberately and on demand from the control center above is not rapporting on this major event and statement. So what happened just a week after the statement? 92 old mummyfied but apparent still fully operational former Foreign Secretary, Henry Kissinger, came to see Russian president Vladimir Putin. Many things can be said about this old man, none of which are very charming, but two thing you must remember to say is, that he is extremely intelligent and has been highly influential. Also remember, that the last 10 years have not been his era but the era of yet another geopolitical mummification, Zbignew Brzecinski, a man that hates everything connected to Russia down to his very guts. 

Apparently mr. Kissinger has had 10 informal conversations with mr. Putin during the reign of the Russian president. And informalon this level of politics does not mean chit-chatting and smalltalking. It is noteworthy, that Kissinger broke with the hardliner faction of US policy when part of the faction, the NeoCons, performed their neo-fascist/neo-nazi coup d'Etat in the Ukraine. He stated then, that USA needed a policy of coorporation and not confrontation with Russia. Kissinger in other words is not an Obama-supporter like Brzecinsky – supporter somehow being a misleading word, handler would be more apropriate, since no US president since the original coup d'Etat in 1876 has been elected by the American people, but been selected by the globalist oligarcy, that ever since have occupied the deep-state control room of the British Empire 2.0 aka The United States. For those of you, that do not know how the rightful and lawful election in 1876 was stolen by fraud from Samuel Tilden by general Rutherford B. Hayes, you may want to go and check it out.

Kissinger is a Zionist, and therefore we may expect many layers of cunningness when he arranges meetings like this. He probably foresees the total destruction of the state of Israel if the US confrontation policy continues. He sees that the Russian bear has been awoken and now is willing to strike back. The ISIS gangs in Syria and Iraq are now under heavy pressure and so are the Turkish scoundrels supporting them. And unlike during the Cold War, where the military power of the Sovjet Union was highly exagerated in order for the US war industry to maintain their enormous budget and profit, Russia now has real and modernized striking power.

The commentator at The Russia Insider describes Sergey Lavrov as extremely well prepared. He spoke for three full hours without any notes for support. He answers in detail to posed question. He used fewer diplomatic eufemisms than before, meaning that he was given green light from Putin to speak out with perfect clarity and not hold back. He is the longest serving member of the Russian governement and a man of high intellect, and unlike Kissingers Zionist shrewdness and willingness to lie, cheat and commit mass murder at will to serve some narrow interests. He is a real statesman, not just a political spindoktor and manipulator. He adressed all the main issues of Russian Foreign Policy including relationship to the USA and the EU, the latter mostly concerning the sanctions, that we all (?) know have been forced onto the Europeans by the Americans. Lavrov knows, that there is great frustration among the Europeans and that right now political powers – the Germans eg. - are working backstage to get out of the US stangulation grip.

Lavrov knows for sure, that the forced saparation of Germany and Russia was the main purpose of both First and Second World War. The natural cultural and ethnic unification of the Eurasian continuum was all the time worst nightmare for the Empire of Envy, the British-American Empire. This is why Poland has been used som many times to cut the bonds between the two countries. This is why NATO has ploughed its way into Eastern Europe by violating all its promises after the Cold War. This is why they have been pushing their policy of contingency trying to sorround Russia with military bases, organized terrorist movements, colored revolutions, proxy wars and corruption of regimes. It is classic geopolitics in the spirit of Halford Mackinder and his Seize of the Heart Land. It is classic imperialism with almost modern means – you can't help notizing that the imperial psychopaths tend to use the same old filthy methods as their forefathers did hundreds of years ago. Same human species to scare, plunder, rape and kill or enslave – same methods.

Lavrov was aksked at the press conference, whether a reset of the US-Russian relationsship was possible in the the last year of the Obama administration. His answer was:

We gave a rather constructive response to the reset. We said, that we appreciated the decision of the new administration to correct the errors iaggreements on various conflikt situations.

But somehow this suddently began to drop back to zero. Now, everyone including our American collegues told os: just fulfill the Minsk Accords on the Ukraine, and immediately everything will return to normal. We will immediately cancel the sanctions and the prospects of coorporation will open upen up between Russia and the United States over much more pleasant issues and not just in the management of crises. Right away a constructive partnership will take place.

That was Lavrov mimicking what they were told. He goes on to comment on it:

We are open to coorporation with everyone on an equally and mutually adventageous basis. We do not, of course, want anyone to build their policy based on the assumption, that Russia and not the Ukraine must fulfill the Minsk Accords. It is written there, who must fulfill them. I hope this is well know to the USA.

At least my lates contact with US secretary of state, John Kerry, the contacts with deputary secretary of state, Victoria Nuland, with assistance of the Russian president Sukrov indicates, that the US can sort out the Minsk Accords. Grosso Modo, so everyone understands everything.

He thus tossed the ball back into the United States, the land of double standards. Which is quite interesting to witness, that is: how the Russian strategy has been to use the Westen/American lies, broken promises and contempt for international treaties, conventions and aggreements and thereby severe and long lasting moral problem against themselves. We saw it at the Syrian crisis. Russia did not intervene militarily before there was an official pledge from the legal and elected – like him or not – president of Syria. We saw it, when mr. Kerry stood up a year ago and lied with his skull and his bones about Assad using sarin gas against his own people. We saw it in the Ukraine, then the only military intervention took place, when the neo-fascists (of which Victoria Nuland is one…) tried to snatch the whole Russian Black Sea base in Crimea, expecting Russia just to stand down and stare at it. These people are like little spoiled, psykopathic children pushing limits to see, when they get a response. The Russian reaction on the other hand has been amazingly restrained and mature.

And we see it in the Russian state television channel, rt.com, who's strategy is to fill the immense vacuum of non-information, non-conversation, non-mentioning and non-trustworthyness, that has been build up during the Cold war – the Second World War that never ended – and has gone full blown thereafter culmination today (hopefully). The strategy is actually telling the truth if possible, surprise-surprise, never tried that before in the West, since we according to our benevolent patrons can't handle the truth! Millions of people though around the World are sick and tired of being lied to by their fascist corporate media and seeks the real stuff. And although we should always be careful with state sponsored media, especially on certain issues of which one of them seem to be immigration and racism – rt.com doesn't really get that one – the strategy works and is being appreciated. 

This ties back into Lavrovs and Putins style of dealing with reality. Looking a weasel or a misbehaving dog right into its eyes will make it feel very uncomfortable and behave in a creeping-cowardly or a desperate aggressive fashion. We see both attitudes in the West. Lavrovs direct statements is of this kind, and we can learn from them, that the sanctions against Russia are simply not working. Remember – or understand, if not understood already - that economic and commercial sanctions are nothing else than an act of war morally justified by media villification of a foreign nation.

Lavrov goes on with a history lesson:

This all began when there was no Ukraine although they now try to blame it all on OSCE principles. Everything that is going on between Russia and the West is explained by the fact, that Russia did not fulfill its obligation, did not respect the Worĺd Order (.. which in a way is true, who's order are we talking about?), which was put together in the Helsinki Act.

This is all an excuse to find ways for a Policy of Containment, and this policy never ended.

So Lavrov says without any diplomatic veil, that Russia is not going to play ball with the same old Cold War politics any more. They've had it!

The Ukranian crisis was just a pretext. The Ukraine was linket not so much with justified concern over an alleged violation by Russia of the Helsinki Principles although everything began with Kosovo and with the bombing of Yugoslavia. This was an expression of irritation, that the coup d'Etat (in the Ukraine) did not lead to the results as expected by those who supported it.

Secondary commenator, Joseph P. Farrell, here reads between the lines, that it was a corporate take-over attempt. Remember again the technical definition of Fascism: half corporate, half government all in one basket. If you back a couple of years, you will see, that there were GMO agrobusiness giants buying themseles into an area, where they had been excluded till then. You will also see, that there were non-governmental organisation (NGO-fascism) there operation on behalf of US intelligence. The results did not work out as they were supposed to, so now they are blaming Russia.

I will tell you honestly, we do not hold a grudge. We have no such traditions in the relation between states. We understand that life is tougher that any ideal, romantic scheme like ”reset” or any similar such notion. We also understand, that this is a world of harsh clashes of interest, that come down to us from the age of the West's total domination. And it is amidst a period of transition to a more durable system in which there will not be neither one or two dominant poles. There will be several.

The transition period is long and painful, all habits die slowly, we all understand that.

Lavrov says, that the West is clinging to old Cold War habits, and that Russia has moved beyond that.

We understand, that the US is interested in having fewer competitors in regards to influence, military power and economy. We see this in the relationship between USA and China and how the USA works with the European Union trying to create a ring around it via the Trans Atlantic Partnership and to the east of Russia to create a Trans Pacific Partnership, which will not include Russia and China.

Russian president, Vladimir Putin, spoke about this in detail, when he analyzed the processes at work in the world economy. We all understand all of this.

To answer your question, I would like to advice the US simply to have a reset with the Whole World, so that the reset was general!

This is tough talk. He is dealing with the whole issue of Unipolarism, the main old issue of the Empire of Envy, not allowing any state in the World to have its own prosperity, its own rules, its own culture, its own economy, its own and rightful ressources, and regarding any state, that would attempt that, to be an offence to the Empire and therefore needs to be slain to the ground.

Then we could gather together our commitment to the UN Charter and the principles embodied in it including the non-interference with internal affairs, the respect for territorial integrity, the right for peoples self determination and the right for people to choose their own future without interference from outside.

Question two. At the Munich Conference at 2007 president Putin said to the West: You need us more than we need you. Is that still Russia's position?

Ideally we still need each other to face the challenges and threats.

If we read between the lines here, he is talking about international islamicist terrorism. And here he is being diplomatic again. A non diplomatic statement without velvet gloves would have been: Neither we nor the people of the Levantine or the people of Europe need to coorporate with those states that have created this terrorism, which would be the USA, Israel and the AngloZionists, the UK, Saudi Arabia and its cucksucking Emirates - and Turkey. And if we go back to the Libyan war, this would include France as well. So here we have the global terror-axis-of-evil. Lavrov didn't say that, but his boss, Putin, has stated something similar to that in the recent years. Remember again, that Russia has chosen to play by the book of international treaties and written-down rules of behaviour for states, which its hypocratic opponents are violating every time, they have a chance. Confront your enimy, don't become your enimy.

Reality is different (than what is said about it). The West comes to us for help much more often, than we come to the West. As a response to Western sanctions, we are striving now to be self sufficient and promote import substitutions.

We are not trying to cut ourselves off from the World, we are ready for coorporation as long as it is based on equality.

Meaning: the West will not be allowed to use the Ukraine as a stepping stone for Russia itself. May we remind ourselves of the history of the last 25 years. Since the Fall of the Wall and the Sovjet Union, the West – that is the USA and the banking cartels of Wall Street – has strived to redefine the Russian de-sovjetizedculture and deprive the Russian people their right to self-redefinition. This started with the era of vodka-addict and red nosed clown Boris Jeltsin. As former top investment banker, Mads Palsvig, brilliantly pointed out at his speech in Copenhagen jan. 26th, that the Western banksters and their puppet politicians in and outside Russia managed to make a perversion coup of the Russian constitution, forbidding Bank of Russia to buy bonds in Russian rubles! It is unheard-of monetarian imperialism that a sovereign country by its own constitution is not allowed to use its own currency! There is apparently a Fifth Column of Western infiltrators embedded deeply into Russian central banking system. In the years after the CIA-Jeltsin era, we saw a Russia still too weak to oppose the West and claim real sovereignty. Only when Vladimir Putin kicked the butt on Jeltsin, change started to happen. We also saw some severe butt-kicking on greedy oligarks and the emancipation of Russian oil- and gas companies from Western grip. Till then they had stolen all Russian oil without paying for it.

I am a banker. I would know.

So, apparently the capturing of the Russian 'national' bank – not unsurprisingly nothing like national but a Rothschild globalist vehicle like any other central bank in the world (including the Danish Nationalbanken) – is still continuing. Mr. Putin has tried several times to nationalize it, but the corrupt elements of the Duma has prevented it.

In that sense, the Ukraine take-over is a variation of the colored revolutions strategy of destabilisation and balkanisation (a Kissinger motto). A destabilised country is an easy drive-through for the Empire. When a country is eaten up from inside by internal ethnic, political, ideological conflicts, the tanksters and the banksters just roll in and through.

But both in the Ukraine and in Syria, Russia has been able to draw a line in the soil and the sand making a mockery of the Obama rhetoric using the same vocabularies. And the recent speech for Sergey Lavrov, blackout'ed and ignored by the Corporate Fascist Media of the entire West, points it out: No more business as usual.

Any state, super state, state system, organisation, federation, ideology, strategy ... whatever, that is unable to adapt to reality, has written its own death sentence and digged its own grave. Requiem Aeternam, may it rest in peace.