Viser opslag med etiketten Empire. Vis alle opslag
Viser opslag med etiketten Empire. Vis alle opslag

lørdag den 2. april 2016

The Amputation of Time - an Anatomy of Genocide


by morton_h, the blogger
– translation Dylan Waller

Something very old and nefarious has been going on in the world for too long of a time. When a conflict erupts somewhere in our modern-day world, we can be sure its antecedent is nearby, whether decades or centuries ago. In some cases, aeons.

Recently, war propaganda is being taken up against Iran - again. In the current iteration, the group which our humanitarian concerns are supposed to be brought to bear upon are the Bahai. The hysteria says that the Iranians are about to commit a genocide on the members of this sect. This statement is as untrustworthy and hypocritical as the fallacy that Iran is in the process of building a nuclear weapon and is about to nuke the whole world. Hypocrites and propagandists of course never care to argue as to why these absurd and shrill accusations would make any sense. Why a civilized people with an ancient culture and highly-educated population should look for any advantage in such irrational collective-psychosis and counter-intuitive action is never explained. Sound logic has never worried hypocritical warmongers. They sling around the assumptions, allegations, and accusations without concern for whether they are real. They are fully confident that the target audience for their propaganda are unable to see through their rhetoric, which is often unfortunately the case.



When Western warmongers pronounce the word genocide with their mouths, a string of red flags should light up, as the historical precedent of genocide from these warmongers is completely overwhelming. Problem: most people, especially in the Anglo-Saxon countries, do not have any idea about the extent of the atrocities that their ruling class has inflicted upon the world in even just the last 150 years. Which concurrently means that all who are infected with this English Mental Health have no clue of the scale. The maintenance of Empire depends on the number of its faithful, supportive ignoramuses.

One cannot say that it was the British Empire that invented the falsification of history, but one can definitely say that this Empire was able to implement it like never before in history - and so, history has become their forgery. It would therefore set the record straight to assert that nothing of what we today hear, read, and see regarding the Empire and its role in the world is reliable. As one Iranian historian puts it: every time you overturn a stone, an Englishman hides underneath. The British imperialists, slave traders, drugdealers, pirates of land and at sea, have been everywhere. Upon arrival, they exerted their piracy and plunder, their murders, their foundations of strife - and their special kind of historiography, which is why the extent of their genocide has only minimally been made clear. The story of it has itself been simply wiped out! Historically, we are denied a plethora of information with which the world could have seen it coming, and at least understood its antecedent. The false are able to get away with their falsehoods because they have also controlled the media and academic institutions.

That's the story of the inability to represent history accurately until now. It is never possible in the long run to maintain a total erasure, especially in the era of the internet. There are records, written testimonials, documents, relics. There are gaps, inconsistencies and loose ends in the projection of false histories, just as there are holes in any criminal case with those wrongfully convicted. The track exists, even if it has been deleted, even if there are only traces of the deletion. The perfect crime simply does not exist. It is not a question of whether one can cover up a crime, but how long one is able to get away with it. The criminal mindset is: if I can postpone the day of reckoning until after my own passing from this world, then I have succeeded. In the passing, we probably don't consider the possibility of reincarnating'.

British history is packed to the brim with falsification. All history of England before 1066 is roughly smudged. It is as if people hardly lived before that, and that those who lived then were not worth writing about. But one would only have to move just once through the British countryside to be aware that it was very much similar to its current name: a land of green pastures. It's one big lush garden, where everywhere grows a large lush forest. A friendly and diverse landscape, where human culture existed very far back. So the Imperial amputation of time before the Battle of Hastings is quite unnecessary for other than just that: Empire. These are political and ideological choices that have created historical aberrations.



There were some concerns which the rulers of England, as early precursors to the formation of Empire, believed they had to take upon themselves, in regard to disputes about kingship. To legitimize the rulership of the throne, one had to have the legal progeny so that whoever wanted to usurp the throne had to refer to this lineage of history. The genera rooted in the past, referring to authentic history, usurped these references they had cobbled together. It was in such an act that the figure of King Arthur disappeared, whereby an important chapter in the history of Wales plunged into darkness. The so-called Prince of Wales, wife-murderer and pedophile Charles, is a contemporary product of this historical pollution. As the two Welsh historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett documented thoroughly, there was not just one King Arthur, but two: there was also Artorius Rex, King of Gwent and Glamorgan, with a few hundred years separating the two figures. They are some of the most well-documented of all figures. As has been said and written, it is not because the documents do not exist, it is because the established historiography, power, money, and the church's endorsement of quackademia refused to touch it, with the well-dressed clerks of Oxford and Cambridge and all the rest laundering history in their black-and-white unsoiled school-uniforms'.

Other certain terms have been used when the crown is up to its dirty tricks, domestically and abroad, that people were unable to hear about. The Queen of England nourished and enriched herself through piracy. It did not look good that the fine and noble ladies and gentlemen highest on the straw were nothing but wretched scumbags, highwaymen, simple purse-snatchers and tricksters. So they hired so-called privateers to conduct their shady affairs, after which their scribes made sure to find and promote only 'heroic' figures such as Sir Francis Drake - note the title, Sir, knighted, a very fine nobleman. The sinking of the Spanish Armada and the theft of the Spaniards' gold is not much different from the current version of the Empire's emptying of the Cypriot treasury a few years ago. Or the Grecian, Italian, Spanish again, Portuguese, Icelandic, Libyan, Ukrainian'.


Or in one headline: all Imperial institutions - the IMF, WTO, ECB - arrive and give a country of the world a deal they cannot refuse. As long as this mafia operates above the radar, they will not be identified as the simple crooks and conmen that they are. Just as in the days of piracy, the crown gets its image whitewashed by media-lies and the falsification of history, and, just as in the past, there are two blind spots for the culprits. Firstly, there are people who know what is going on and who do not keep it sealed up. Cover-up is difficult in large, complex matters. Bloody footprints are left in the snow, and something has been swept under the carpet, which is still there, if only someone dares to lift it. This last point is not unimportant, for there exists a very large and widespread fear of reprisals, including among historians. Secondly, there has been a parallel alternate history report. In the Middle Ages, history subsisted largely of an oral, vernacular tradition. Do not underestimate word-of-mouth! It is extremely stable over long spans of time. When Wilson and Blackett talked with the locals in Wales about the renowned, legendary battles before 1066 and their local impact, incidents considered quackademia by the Establishment's educational temples, which claims they never happened, they were readily able to point to the spot. It was quite common knowledge to quite ordinary people. The spoken word is superior to the written, for the former is the popular context whereby one speaks the truth. The narrator has to see his listeners in the eyes. In other words, imprinting. This is therefore where the concept of 'true to type' originates. Interesting, is it not? Never overestimate Quackademia.

Today, the alternative history is alive on the Internet. Its frequencies are flickering, as everything can be posted online, dirt and cinammon, sandbars and scrub. Nevertheless, it is also a valuable source of genuine information, making it impossible for the Empire to wipe out whole chunks of history the way that could be done back in the days of the Roman Empire. One can pollute the information-box, one can throw out flares of distraction in order to confuse ('all that glitters is not gold''), but it is very difficult to remove. They try, they even try very hard. We look at the various forms of coming censorship. For example, we all exercise self-censorship, by being politically correct and partaking in uncritical collaborations. Today we have a new Medieval submission to orthodoxy, and unbelievers are heretics. If you are a true believer, then you are politically correct. Good boy, sitting still for hours. Nice girl, submitting her bill on time. Good monitor, who on behalf of the schoolmaster keeps track of the students, to make sure everyone is good boy and nice girl. We have a new Spanish Inquisition, appearing in public, where the falsification of history reigns supreme. Take a look at the French government's monitoring of its populace after the terrorist event there. We see the criminalization of those people who exist outside of Power Corridors. We see a new form of pogroms, where websites will be shut down, instead of piles of books burned in the city square by men in black cowls. A new Dark Age has arrived.



In the 17th & 18th centuries, the Empire had begun a series of shady affairs having to do with the New World. It is also here that we see the crimes committed against the Welsh. Their local languages were banned, their ancient written language was declared nonexistent, even if it was chiseled in stone from the past. Man banned simply a language, in which people spoke and wrote! In the 18th century, it was simply forbidden to speak Welsh, and all local schoolteachers were fired and replaced by Englishmen. George II is the man behind this cultural character assassination. As Danes, imagine if the Germans forbid us to speak Danish, but only German. The Empire was paranoid, the British did not understand Welsh, and suppose the Welsh were able to slander them in a language they did not understand. It had to be banned.

It is also the age of Darwinism. Darwin stated: of all human races, the Irish are the lowest! And here we thought the British imperialist twats thought the lowest were 'Hottentots and Negroes', but no, it was their musical and literate neighboring peoples. There was something going on here. And sure enough, after the 1845-1852 Irish genocide, the era of genocide had begun. Pseudo-scientific Darwinism was in vogue for what it was: faux-empirical support for the extermination of the weak. In other words, this profusion of eugenicists, imperialists, opium-pushers, slavehandlers, pirates and industrialists culminated in a series of genocides, all making their best effort to commit these acts without leaving a fingerprint. Remember again: wherever a genocide takes place, the erasure of history appears in tandem. The Irish genocide was swept beneath the carpet under the name of the Potato Plague. So the lowly, potato-munching Irishmen were snuffed out, according to British historians, because the potato crop failed for a few years, and the morons were unable to figure out how to grow and eat more! The historians wrote it that way, and we have been reading it ever since. This is but one instance of the sick mental-ideological lies the British have inflicted upon world history, a historical mental plague of lies that generations have been forced to absorb in absurd, lethal doses.

Thus satisfied by their atrocity against the Irish, which cost millions of lives, whose mass graves are located within a two kilometer space to this day, the British killers employed the same tactics against the Indians. What was this tactic? In Ireland it consisted of organized famine. The tactic is both extremely perfidious and quite convenient.

The first convenience: you do not need to cover your own delicate, manicured hands in human blood, you just close the door and turn on the hot water. It is an internal embargo carried out by the occupying power of a country.

Convenience number two: the scenario contains a sufficiently strong resemblance to a natural catastrophe, so as to advance a random theory based on the denial of evidence. Should anyone complain about glaring anomalies in this natural incident - a rather Darwinian concept - you can label them random theorists. 'It was not us, it was the potatoes.' In India, it was not potatoes, but rice. The rice harvest was confiscated and appropriated, and Indians died like flies. 26 million perished! And that's a conservative estimate. 'It was not us, it was the rice.'
'The illusion of accident disappears gradually as the skill of map reading increases.'- John Murphy


Casestudy of Genocide: Iran 1917-19

Thus satisfied by their misdeeds against the Irish, Indians, and meanwhile Tasmanians and the Boers in South Africa along with an endless stream of other vexations, the British killers carried on with the same tactics against the Iranians. We are in the fateful second decade of the 20th century when what transpires then unfolds all the evil of the next 100 years, which continues to bear its cancers to this day. It is the Imperial decade, with all of these mega-events flying the banner of the British Empire, bearing their fingerprints. The German empire fell, the Austro-Hungarian fell, the Ottomans are gone, the Russian tsars are vanquished. It was the Imperial decade, where in every case, the picture is painted over by Anglo-Saxon historians, falsifiers of history, who gloss events over into 'heroic' efforts to 'civilize' the dark edges of the world and the prodigious global underclass. The White Man's Burden. The world's victims could almost feel sorry for its tormentors.

Iranian genocide, you say? What's that? We have never heard of such a thing. There's a lot that took place that you and I have not heard about in school, read about in the newspaper, or absorbed via television. A new category of logical fallacies/false logical statements erupt: because I have never heard about an event, it must not have ever existed. However, during the period of 1917-19, half of Iran's population was wiped out in the same way as the Irish and the Indian. They were starved.




Iran is a great country. There are areas where drought can occur. Elsewhere, there may occur floods. Elsewhere again, there is an abundance of crop and vegetation. It would be ridiculous to assume that half the population starved to death due to climatic factors. The population was halved during the British occupation of Iran during World War I.


The event is one of the best kept secrets in all of perfidious Albion- It is totally omitted from world history except for a few footnotes here and there. Recently, an Iranian historian named Mohammad Gholi Majd, a doctor of agricultural economics from Cornell University, delved into the primary sources, excavated and exposed the incident in the book 'The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919', along with a handful of other books in which he describes what happened with Iraq during the First World War, which, unsurprisingly, then as now, had to do with oil.



The murder of half the Iranian population is recorded in the British and Americans' own records via censuses (from the US Dept of State). Censuses were taken every ten years and clearly show a population reduction of 50% between 1910-1920. Persia was in 1917 an occupied country. Northern Persia was the Russian zone, the middle was neutral (i.e. Persian? No, not once was it free, the Ottomans laid their stakes there), the southeast was the British zone bordering India, which at that time had not yet been smashed into two parts as an act of revenge by the British, the soon-to-come, forced-fragmentation of India/Pakistan. That was perfidious Albion's reprisal due to India's secession from Empire, empowered by Gandhi, after WW2, whitewashed from history in the same way that World War I was a British rather than German invention as the false-history makers who distort and conceal British robber-history would have us believe. Divide and Conquer, or Death and Hunger, seems to be the Empire's default form of governance. The alliteration repeats itself in the Empire's own language: Divide and Conquer, Death and Hunger.

It is worth noting that the devastation of Iran took special momentum after the Russian Revolution - a dynamic coincidence! And the Ottoman Empire fell to pieces shortly thereafter. And the hijacking of the US economy in the form of the Federal Reserve took place shortly beforehand. And the staging of the Titanic shipwreck. And the sinking of the Lusitania. And the Balfour Declaration. And the Treaty of Versailles. And the creation of the pharmaceutical industry. And many other things within this one fateful decade, which is why the British robber-historians call it the Great War, feigning ignorance, saying One Incident Begat Another - it all just happened, and we know not why or who instigated it, though surely it was not us. It was the potatoes, it was the rice, it was the lone madman in Sarajevo, it was a powder-keg and there was just a spark that lit it, it was an iceberg, it was the other, it was not us. It is odd that world history is a heap of these accidental synchronicities, and that those responsible refuse responsibility! For a synchronistic comprehension of events, one must look at the timespan and ask: could there be a connection? The short answer is: context. The long answer is paradigmet.blogspot and the demarcated response is this blog post.

The genocide of half the Iranian population took place in the regions under British control. Starvation is quite effective for killing people in large numbers. Henry Kissinger - an enormous proponent of the glories of genocide - was at one point asked his opinion on the best method of how to control large crowds. His answer was: food. And money. He knew the totality of the Anglo-American geopolitical tactics. He also said: by Balkanization (divide and conquer, ISIS in the Middle East right now). He could have added: health, medicine, pharmaceuticals, vaccines and biological WMDs to the mix. Or he could have said: by never telling the truth, to yourself or others. And just as with famine as a weapon, we must not forget the dimension of terror located within it. There's an extreme level of state terror in that an occupying power arranges that people fall to the ground in starvation. Starved people have no will to resist. They are deeply weakened, scared witless.



We have answered the question of why the world does not know about the Iranian genocide, for it was blotted out by the false-historians. But how do we know about it anyway? We know about it through a series of memoirs of British officers who served in World War I. They were horrified by what they witnessed. Although their country and army were led by psychopaths, they themselves were just people. One example is the intelligence officer M.H. Donahoe, an attache of the British army in Persia. He recounts in his detailed memoirs the countless dead bodies by the roadsides and in the streets. This is confirmed by US diplomatic reports as well. People had to eat tree roots. Cannibalism and scavenging were widespread. Cholera and typhoid predictably were as well, and as in the last years of the German labor camps, people died like flies as their immune systems broke down. That is the real holocaust, not the Hollywood fiction which has never been documented, only alleged. It was spurious and hypocritical of the British false-historians, mendacious of them, forcibly digested by the world's population in the postwar period. The real history of the two world wars is not even written yet. We must write it! There is no one else to do it for us anymore.

This mind-boggling paradox - and people understand that it really is not! - is that the Empire assaults and destroys nations and human life, and in its perverse sense of justice blames the victims afterward! The destructive potential of false historiography is revealing. First you destroy a country and its people by killing half of them, raping their women, smashing their towns, roads, factories, stealing their valuables, you name it. And then dictate to the historians as if it were THEM who had perpetrated this against the destroyers! Since those whose countries and populations have been sunk way down in the shit, they do not have the strength to defend themselves in textbooks or on battlefields. It's like victims of torture who become willing to confess anything, just as long as the torture stops. This is also why it is totally useless to employ torture as a means of gaining legitimate information, as even someone who really knows something will simply confess whatever is required, whatever fits the dominant, expected narrative, regardless of truth.

'It is in this vaccuum of time before, during, and after a war, that it becomes possible to manifest and dictate these distortions of reality. All communication is strictly controlled and militarized. The military information channels are hyperactive while public access to the creation and reception of information is blocked, and the occasion is ripe for fictitious substitutes for knowledge. This is one telltale sign that the Third World War is in the stage of deployment, due to all the signs of militarized, distorted communication hitting us right now.



Only in 1919, after half of the Iranians were dead, did they finally get a decent harvest, enough to get the country out of the famine. The British grip was loosened, but never abandoned. The British controlled the transport of food, seized most of the infrastructure in both Iran and Iraq, and prevented imports from Iraq. Again, we see something like this right now. Embargo is another weapon of war against a country, and Iran is currently subject to an American embargo, also imposed by the EU. The EU has been forced to impose it, which shows that the EU is merely an instrument of the United States - only foolish Europeans could believe that they maintain their own independent Empire. That would be patently false. The USA can always twist Europe's arm, as the dominant and domineering partner of NATO. We see evidence of this now in relation to Russia/Ukraine.

Let us also remind ourselves that the concept of genocide does not only include the physical murder of individuals and groups. According to the UN definition, it includes any orchestrated effort to degrade and destroy people's quality of life and living conditions. It is like poisoning. Poison can become so acute, you become ill and die from it immediately. Strychnine, cyanide, arsenic, white fly agaric. It can also be chronic, so as to slowly, over the years, create worsening conditions. Sugar, heavy metals, cigarettes, alcohol, GMOs, industrial pollution'

And here it becomes extremely perfidious, in regard to chronic genocide, like chronic poison digested by the people themselves.



The British therefore never lost their grip on Iran. In the decades after the 1917-19 genocide, the Iranian governments were in a state of constant and enthusiastic readiness to cover up what had happened during the famine in WW1. Why? Because they were created and installed by the British. They were not real Iranian governments, they were puppets. Most have heard of Reza Pahlavi, Shah of Persia as they called him, inserted via a British MI5 + American CIA coup in 1953, with the democratically elected President Mohammed Mozadeq reduced to a brief intermezzo in a 60-year history of military dictatorship. Few people are aware that his father was infiltrated by a similar coup in 1921. A Shah, how wonderful. Many Iranians who had to flee Iran retained nostalgia for a historical Shah figure, as it evokes echoes of the heyday of Persian civilisation, which was a truly grandiose kingdom and culture. The coup played on this sentiment deliberately, in order to gain the support of Iranian intellectuals and upper classes. They were bribed with certain privileges in return. But it was never made clear who this 'Shah' family really was.

We all know who replaced the Shah's military regime. It was Ayatollah Khomeini and co. But how much do we know about this figure? He was nothing but a British agent. This is the kind of thing Hegelian dialecticians and their cabal employ in creation of their artificial dialectic. This is in order to assert an apparent contradiction, a revolutionary counterpoint. Once the meme is worn out, it's time to deposit the antithesis. The synthesis is always located and operating at a level above. Such a sophisticated system of manipulation and control is very difficult for people to understand, which is why it works. As with the entire Muslim Brotherhood, wahhabism/salafism, the British had developed a special tactic to create and introduce false religious leaders. But this was only partially successful with Khoumeini, for his gang was slowly outmaneuvered. His death was also fairly sudden, which leads one naturally to questions of whether it was a natural death.



Today we are back again with Iran as a pain-in-the-arse for the Empire, with the screaming necks of Zionists calling for bombing of Iran, and potentially even its nuclear annihilation. We have seen a grueling embargo. Press.tv, the Iranian state television station, has been censored and closed down in the West. There have been the usual, constant provocations by CIA supported groups in Iran. There have been constant misinformation campaigns against Iran, claiming that they were about to produce nuclear weapons. One plan-in-waiting is a mega false-flag in the Persian Gulf, in the form of staging an Iranian attack on a US warship in order to shut down traffic. The Saudis, the fake royal family, who, as with the Pahlawis, the Shah's family, were created by the British 100 years ago to be a British operating system in the region, and they will do anything to destroy Iran. Israel despise them because of their support for Shia groups, Hezbollah, the Syrian government. Recently there were again provocations via an American gun boat that had strayed out of international waters, into Iranian territory, and forgot to turn its radio on, whoops! Ah, well, when you put it that way'also, the Iranians have leaked information that they apprehended an ISIS general on board the boat. What was he doing there, and where was he going? Oops again'

In the 80s we saw the Iran-Iraq war, a conflict which was also engineered by the Western Empire. Then we had the Iran-Contra affair, more US domestic politics, a cabal circulating around mega-psychopath George H.W. Bush, in an effort to undermine and ridicule Jimmy Carter. Reagan was already undermined by his Alzheimer's, which caused him to sleep 18 hours a day and then read like a zombie from preprinted placards - while former CIA director Bush reigned behind him. When you take the entirety of the picture into account, it is frankly astonishing that Iran continues to hang together as an intact nation with its own will and identity. Admirably unbelievable! The culture has something special about it which is enviable, and envy which obviously infects the Imperials, or they would not be working overtime to undermine and demolish this sovereign nation.

It must be said: genocide continues steadily unless it is spoken out against loudly and repeatedly. We can do little else but talk loudly about these issues 24/7. At some point the awareness penetrates the pleasantries of what passes diplomatically for reality. Such pleasantries may be entertaining, in their own macabre way, but let us not split hairs. The question is: are you man- or womenfolk capable of looking this reality in the eyes? You should know that this reality fears the eye that looks directly into it more than anything else in the world. This reality cannot withstand the light of day. Like a vampire, whose pale white body tolerates no sunlight.

The past 200 years have been the Age of Genocide. May the next years and decades be the age of the exposure and extinguishing of Genocides.

fredag den 19. februar 2016

The Darth Vader Empire & Skynet...coming to a town near you

Front Cover from Dot-Connector Magazine # 1 2009. Download PDF here

by ChaosNavigator

"We live in a time that a science fiction book would refer to as 'that time when everything had already changed, only people were too scared, too ignorant or too arrogant to understand and they pretended and acted as if everything was still normal and it wasn't."
-  Libbe HaLevy

"Coming events cast their shadows before."
- Thomas Campbell
 

Preface: As I have written many times: Gloomy reflections, mind-boggling changes and forecasts don't seem to reach the majority, less so have an impact, are drowned in the information overload, sense bombardment,  indifference, ignorance, confusion, hedonism, narcissism, defeatism, egotism, normalcy bias, cognitive dissonance, densensitization,etc. (which is the reason why articles such as this one might be ignored), and are far worse than depicted by most mainstream media or ignored/suppressed by most mainstream corporate media and therefore; most of us won't act before we are forced to by immediate circumstances in the event of breakdown scenarios.

Result: The unprepared will be in dire straits and only the minority groups with foresight, awareness, pro-active visions are - as minimum prerequisites – prompted to act now before it becomes necessity. And few have..... 

The Internet Reformation itself is providing a new revolutionary narrative in the midst of confusion and censorship. But we have much more power than we think. We just need to wake up. People ARE waking up and great change beyond belief is coming.


http://images.alphacoders.com/303/303733.jpg



Again: Never before has the survival of our species been dependent upon your awakening and activism! It's all happening NOW: Revision, reformation, revolution, renaissance - in the midst of breakdowns and breakthroughs.      

It only takes a few moments to share an article, but the person on the other end who reads it might have his life changed forever   
- Investment Watch                                       

Bulletpoints - a short status list:

The American people (and Europeans to a lesser extent) have been participants in their very own Milgramexperiment being conducted by their government since 9/11. Since the passage of the Patriot Act, the government continues to demand that its citizens increase the voltage in the name of security. The following list has been verified many times. Since 2001 (and before) the Orwellian and insane developments and measures have included:


See also:War, Terrorism and the Global Economic Crisis in 2015: Ninety-nine Interrelated Concepts
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, December 25, 2015




søndag den 7. februar 2016

Global Media Fascism


by morton_h, the blogger

It is hard to actually believe for people. It is too big, therefore it cannot be. And please add this to the list of logical fallacies as Appeal to Bigness

Too big a toad to fathom.
Too big to feel - to big to fight?

Western Media on mainstream level is now a fulfilled monolithic corporate fascist entity, where everything is controlled by a network of global corporate deep state governance. That would mean a very few people owning a very few but very big feeding channels controlling 99% of mainstream online or printed media of the West. And the last 1% dare not go against it.

We have known that for some time now, and some have known it all along. But recently a significant proof of this being very real and not some too-big-to-fathom theory is the fact, that an article by Gilbert Doctorow in The Russia Insider as the only source titled: Russia's Had Enough – No More Business As Usual With The US, is quoting Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, giving a 3 hour long speech in the annual press conference from the ministry, which then has been totally ignored by all media in the West.

Mr. Lavrov said:

For Russia there wil be no more business as usual with the European Union or the United States. A new stage of developement is dawning, which can develop only on the basis of equal rights and all other principles of international law.

For a statement of such huge significance to be totally blacked out by Western media it takes a totalitarian structure named above as Global Media Fascism. The word fascism is not used here in the usual infantile sloppy-ignorant way that leftists and liberals use it meaning basically: anything they don't like. It is used in the strict techical term of a total merge of corporate and government entities into a totalitarien dictatorship. In that sense, the Sovjet State and the ideology of Socialism was – and is - nothing more than red or pink fascism.

As we have pointed out on this blog several times, it is most hillarious and bizarre that the Sovjet citizens never doubted, that the yellow press of the Sovjet state was lying to its teeth every single day and therefore never could be taken seriously, whereas citizens of Western countries to this day actually believe, that their corporate-fascist media is telling the truth!

Even during the Cold War a statement of such huge importance would have got at least some attention although with a critical edge. After all, those were the days of Sovjet grotesque and exagerated clichée propaganda statements. Which is another paradox, since Russian leaders telling the truth and/or making statements, that are meant to be taken seriously, apparently are regarded as far worse than leaders in those days just bragging and howling. Which again would take us down another rabbit hole with a story, of how the Sovjet state was created by the West in the first place.

So, the current blackout is deeply controlled as are all mainstream media, not just some but ALL! Some papers and stations may be too small to be able to have foreign correspondants actually going to foreign places. So they are dependant on downloading from the large bureaus and agencies. Which means, that they are controlled by the apparent lack of ressources, because these corporate mega-bureaus are 100% controlled by the media mongerers, moguls and mafiosi and their mongoloid, malevolent and mouth-shutting media maggots. Nothing escapes this monster machine, that has been bought up and taken over during the 20th century. Apparent lack of ressources, that is, because minor newsmedia have made a choice of not investigating and not questioning the official narrative, which makes them collaborateurs in the most active sense. In the serious section of the Alternative Media we can find more serious journalism produced by one man with the guts and brain to do so, than any one of those lazy, stupid and corrupt mainstream channels/papers with dozens or hundreds of employed. So it is not a question of ressources, but a deliberate choice. Therefore the Media are guilty in serious crimes against humanity for doing what theý do and not doing what they should! Without the Western Media spreading legs to the sinister forces of the World, no lies, no wars, no political crimes, no terrorism, no banking fraud, none of that would stand a chance.

Journalists of today are even taught in their training years, how to deal with conspiracy theorists. A person recently came across a paper, a manual from a Danish academy for journalism, showing how this is part of their training system! This means, that whenever someone or some information has been officially labelled, journalists are to treat is as not real, but as a crazy theory. This again means – and the blackout'ening of the statement of the Russian Foreign Minister is exactly such an act of politicized media filtering-out – that any part of the reality can be cast out, denied, distorted, ridiculed on top-down. demand. Journalists of today are trained to react to any news info with an either-or-filter. Either: the news info is harmless to theiremployers, and therefore theycan more or less tell the truth – as long as it sells of course, if not theyjust ignore it or angle it more sexed-up. Or: the news info has been classified as harmful to theiremployers, and therefore it is expected of themto either totally ignore it or lie about it. This shows on one side how emprisonedjournalism has become in the era of globalism and on the other hand how desperate the media of the West now is, knowing too well that its level of obsolescense is directly proportional with peoples knowledge of big chunks of reality, that is not reported in the media.

The Media is the enemy of Truth, and therefore the enemy of the people.

When Sergey Lavrov says on the basis of equal rights, he is referring to the right to sovereignty of the Nations of the World. This is the diametrically opposite to the both internal and foreign policy of the US and the EU. This is a total smack in the face of the whole globalist mega-project of the last 225 years, the revolutionary project of the Jesuits, the Sabbateans, the Masonic parasite, the Imperialists, the Industrialists, the Communists, the Zionists, the Cultural Marxists, the NeoCons, the Globalists, … which is: The destruction of Western heritage culture and the the Nation State. Do I hear a squeek about the Zionists wanting a national state? Yes you moron, for themselves, but for everyone else goy on the Planet there should be no nationaccording to them. Which is why Europe is now being destroyed by their organized mass emigration. 



National sovereignty is part of the Russian concept of a New World Order, which is a totally different order than THE nwo of the sick uni-polar world in the sick minds of the sick Western oligarks. A sovereign nation is a nation with permission to have its own opinion, its own domestic and foreign policy, its own economy, its own culture, its own language, its own population. And this is exactlywhat nations of the World have been increasingly denied for the same 225 years – that is since the French Revolution, where the World experienced the modern version of globalism and its ugly face for the first time. The death of national sovereignty and nation states was among the prime goals of the Jaccobin, Frankean, Jesuit-Illuminati agenda.

This is why nationalism has been declared the root of all eviland demonized in general by the globalists. Internationalism on the other hand has been praised as part of the new gospel found in Communism-Marxism-Leninism-Trotsyism. This is why it was called International Socialism. This is why National Socialism as a serious competitor was condemned and destroyed, since it protected a people and a nation in stead of destroying it like the Bolsjevik mass murderers – 147 millions in Russia alone! This is why the EU now destroys the sovereignty of its members transforming Europe into a dysfunctional Super State like the USA.

This is why Mr. Lavrov made his statement on behalf of the Russian Foreign Ministry and thereby Russia itself, and this is why all the corporate fascist media of the West were ordered not to tell about it, this being a total smack in the face of the overall globalist agenda that now – maybe for the first time since Napoleon or Hitler – like them or not – is facing serious opposition. I am willing to include Mahatma Gandhi, Emperor Hirohito and Moammar Gadaffi and a dozen of others to the list of anti-globalists, of which only Gandhi has been officially blue stamped due to his pacifism. He was regarded as a real saint, so they couldn't crush him, although they have tried, which many people don't know.

So Lavrov and the Russians are saying on the one hand, that it according to international law approved by most nations – including those states that constantly are spitting on these very laws, conventions and treaties – to intrude and intervene in a nation and deprive it of its sovereingty. It is illegal to force regime change in a nation just because you don't like the regime – meaning the regime being disobediant and non-subordinate to the demands of the Globalist Empire and its Central Banking System. Which we have recently seen in Libya, Syria and the Ukraine. But on the other hand and even more significantly they are saying, that they will not tolerate the West forcefully exporting its global-fascist concept of dissolution of nation states tothe countries of the World, especially to the neighbouring countries of Russia by whatever means: colored revolutions, corrupt NGO'ism, Gladio 2.0 terror-operations, simple bribe of leaders of states, military intervention, proxy wars by jihadist groups, diverse sinister operations by intelligence agencies, funding of groups of subversive elements … the means and tactics are endless.

Lavrov moreover states the folowing:

To the best of my knowledge not a single report of the event has appeared on major online American, French, British, German newspaper portals or on television channels.

This was not for the lack of substance or newsworthy soundbytes including the headline 'No Business As Usual'. As the sharp tongue, Russian commentor, Maria Sakharov pointed out not long ago due to a similar press briefing: What are all these accredited Western reporters doing in Moscow if nothing gets published abroad? Do they have some other occuption?

The answer is quite simple, though still surprising to most people. Socalled journalists of major Western Media are no longer journalists, but agents for the intelligence services. As the German editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine, the leading German newspaper, Udo Ulfkotte, has pointed out: Me and my colleagues during the Cold War and beyond have been used by the CIA to feed the German readers with their propaganda. Former chief editor of the leading Danish newspaper, Politiken, was a Mossad agent. So either: the appointed rapporters at the Moscow briefings were not real journalists at all, but agents of the intelligence services. Or: they were, in principle, journalists, but their rapports were never used as expected as news rapports meant for publishing, but as intelligence rapports meant for the Agency in the time of war, which we are in, which would be: The Theatre of Third World War.

The Russian Foreign Minister is exposing the hypocracy of the Western Media, that deliberately and on demand from the control center above is not rapporting on this major event and statement. So what happened just a week after the statement? 92 old mummyfied but apparent still fully operational former Foreign Secretary, Henry Kissinger, came to see Russian president Vladimir Putin. Many things can be said about this old man, none of which are very charming, but two thing you must remember to say is, that he is extremely intelligent and has been highly influential. Also remember, that the last 10 years have not been his era but the era of yet another geopolitical mummification, Zbignew Brzecinski, a man that hates everything connected to Russia down to his very guts. 



Apparently mr. Kissinger has had 10 informal conversations with mr. Putin during the reign of the Russian president. And informalon this level of politics does not mean chit-chatting and smalltalking. It is noteworthy, that Kissinger broke with the hardliner faction of US policy when part of the faction, the NeoCons, performed their neo-fascist/neo-nazi coup d'Etat in the Ukraine. He stated then, that USA needed a policy of coorporation and not confrontation with Russia. Kissinger in other words is not an Obama-supporter like Brzecinsky – supporter somehow being a misleading word, handler would be more apropriate, since no US president since the original coup d'Etat in 1876 has been elected by the American people, but been selected by the globalist oligarcy, that ever since have occupied the deep-state control room of the British Empire 2.0 aka The United States. For those of you, that do not know how the rightful and lawful election in 1876 was stolen by fraud from Samuel Tilden by general Rutherford B. Hayes, you may want to go and check it out.

Kissinger is a Zionist, and therefore we may expect many layers of cunningness when he arranges meetings like this. He probably foresees the total destruction of the state of Israel if the US confrontation policy continues. He sees that the Russian bear has been awoken and now is willing to strike back. The ISIS gangs in Syria and Iraq are now under heavy pressure and so are the Turkish scoundrels supporting them. And unlike during the Cold War, where the military power of the Sovjet Union was highly exagerated in order for the US war industry to maintain their enormous budget and profit, Russia now has real and modernized striking power.

The commentator at The Russia Insider describes Sergey Lavrov as extremely well prepared. He spoke for three full hours without any notes for support. He answers in detail to posed question. He used fewer diplomatic eufemisms than before, meaning that he was given green light from Putin to speak out with perfect clarity and not hold back. He is the longest serving member of the Russian governement and a man of high intellect, and unlike Kissingers Zionist shrewdness and willingness to lie, cheat and commit mass murder at will to serve some narrow interests. He is a real statesman, not just a political spindoktor and manipulator. He adressed all the main issues of Russian Foreign Policy including relationship to the USA and the EU, the latter mostly concerning the sanctions, that we all (?) know have been forced onto the Europeans by the Americans. Lavrov knows, that there is great frustration among the Europeans and that right now political powers – the Germans eg. - are working backstage to get out of the US stangulation grip.

Lavrov knows for sure, that the forced saparation of Germany and Russia was the main purpose of both First and Second World War. The natural cultural and ethnic unification of the Eurasian continuum was all the time worst nightmare for the Empire of Envy, the British-American Empire. This is why Poland has been used som many times to cut the bonds between the two countries. This is why NATO has ploughed its way into Eastern Europe by violating all its promises after the Cold War. This is why they have been pushing their policy of contingency trying to sorround Russia with military bases, organized terrorist movements, colored revolutions, proxy wars and corruption of regimes. It is classic geopolitics in the spirit of Halford Mackinder and his Seize of the Heart Land. It is classic imperialism with almost modern means – you can't help notizing that the imperial psychopaths tend to use the same old filthy methods as their forefathers did hundreds of years ago. Same human species to scare, plunder, rape and kill or enslave – same methods.

Lavrov was aksked at the press conference, whether a reset of the US-Russian relationsship was possible in the the last year of the Obama administration. His answer was:

We gave a rather constructive response to the reset. We said, that we appreciated the decision of the new administration to correct the errors iaggreements on various conflikt situations.

But somehow this suddently began to drop back to zero. Now, everyone including our American collegues told os: just fulfill the Minsk Accords on the Ukraine, and immediately everything will return to normal. We will immediately cancel the sanctions and the prospects of coorporation will open upen up between Russia and the United States over much more pleasant issues and not just in the management of crises. Right away a constructive partnership will take place.

That was Lavrov mimicking what they were told. He goes on to comment on it:

We are open to coorporation with everyone on an equally and mutually adventageous basis. We do not, of course, want anyone to build their policy based on the assumption, that Russia and not the Ukraine must fulfill the Minsk Accords. It is written there, who must fulfill them. I hope this is well know to the USA.

At least my lates contact with US secretary of state, John Kerry, the contacts with deputary secretary of state, Victoria Nuland, with assistance of the Russian president Sukrov indicates, that the US can sort out the Minsk Accords. Grosso Modo, so everyone understands everything.

He thus tossed the ball back into the United States, the land of double standards. Which is quite interesting to witness, that is: how the Russian strategy has been to use the Westen/American lies, broken promises and contempt for international treaties, conventions and aggreements and thereby severe and long lasting moral problem against themselves. We saw it at the Syrian crisis. Russia did not intervene militarily before there was an official pledge from the legal and elected – like him or not – president of Syria. We saw it, when mr. Kerry stood up a year ago and lied with his skull and his bones about Assad using sarin gas against his own people. We saw it in the Ukraine, then the only military intervention took place, when the neo-fascists (of which Victoria Nuland is one…) tried to snatch the whole Russian Black Sea base in Crimea, expecting Russia just to stand down and stare at it. These people are like little spoiled, psykopathic children pushing limits to see, when they get a response. The Russian reaction on the other hand has been amazingly restrained and mature.

And we see it in the Russian state television channel, rt.com, who's strategy is to fill the immense vacuum of non-information, non-conversation, non-mentioning and non-trustworthyness, that has been build up during the Cold war – the Second World War that never ended – and has gone full blown thereafter culmination today (hopefully). The strategy is actually telling the truth if possible, surprise-surprise, never tried that before in the West, since we according to our benevolent patrons can't handle the truth! Millions of people though around the World are sick and tired of being lied to by their fascist corporate media and seeks the real stuff. And although we should always be careful with state sponsored media, especially on certain issues of which one of them seem to be immigration and racism – rt.com doesn't really get that one – the strategy works and is being appreciated. 



This ties back into Lavrovs and Putins style of dealing with reality. Looking a weasel or a misbehaving dog right into its eyes will make it feel very uncomfortable and behave in a creeping-cowardly or a desperate aggressive fashion. We see both attitudes in the West. Lavrovs direct statements is of this kind, and we can learn from them, that the sanctions against Russia are simply not working. Remember – or understand, if not understood already - that economic and commercial sanctions are nothing else than an act of war morally justified by media villification of a foreign nation.

Lavrov goes on with a history lesson:

This all began when there was no Ukraine although they now try to blame it all on OSCE principles. Everything that is going on between Russia and the West is explained by the fact, that Russia did not fulfill its obligation, did not respect the Worĺd Order (.. which in a way is true, who's order are we talking about?), which was put together in the Helsinki Act.

This is all an excuse to find ways for a Policy of Containment, and this policy never ended.

So Lavrov says without any diplomatic veil, that Russia is not going to play ball with the same old Cold War politics any more. They've had it!

The Ukranian crisis was just a pretext. The Ukraine was linket not so much with justified concern over an alleged violation by Russia of the Helsinki Principles although everything began with Kosovo and with the bombing of Yugoslavia. This was an expression of irritation, that the coup d'Etat (in the Ukraine) did not lead to the results as expected by those who supported it.

Secondary commenator, Joseph P. Farrell, here reads between the lines, that it was a corporate take-over attempt. Remember again the technical definition of Fascism: half corporate, half government all in one basket. If you back a couple of years, you will see, that there were GMO agrobusiness giants buying themseles into an area, where they had been excluded till then. You will also see, that there were non-governmental organisation (NGO-fascism) there operation on behalf of US intelligence. The results did not work out as they were supposed to, so now they are blaming Russia.

I will tell you honestly, we do not hold a grudge. We have no such traditions in the relation between states. We understand that life is tougher that any ideal, romantic scheme like ”reset” or any similar such notion. We also understand, that this is a world of harsh clashes of interest, that come down to us from the age of the West's total domination. And it is amidst a period of transition to a more durable system in which there will not be neither one or two dominant poles. There will be several.

The transition period is long and painful, all habits die slowly, we all understand that.

Lavrov says, that the West is clinging to old Cold War habits, and that Russia has moved beyond that.

We understand, that the US is interested in having fewer competitors in regards to influence, military power and economy. We see this in the relationship between USA and China and how the USA works with the European Union trying to create a ring around it via the Trans Atlantic Partnership and to the east of Russia to create a Trans Pacific Partnership, which will not include Russia and China.

Russian president, Vladimir Putin, spoke about this in detail, when he analyzed the processes at work in the world economy. We all understand all of this.

To answer your question, I would like to advice the US simply to have a reset with the Whole World, so that the reset was general!

This is tough talk. He is dealing with the whole issue of Unipolarism, the main old issue of the Empire of Envy, not allowing any state in the World to have its own prosperity, its own rules, its own culture, its own economy, its own and rightful ressources, and regarding any state, that would attempt that, to be an offence to the Empire and therefore needs to be slain to the ground.

Then we could gather together our commitment to the UN Charter and the principles embodied in it including the non-interference with internal affairs, the respect for territorial integrity, the right for peoples self determination and the right for people to choose their own future without interference from outside.

Question two. At the Munich Conference at 2007 president Putin said to the West: You need us more than we need you. Is that still Russia's position?

Ideally we still need each other to face the challenges and threats.

If we read between the lines here, he is talking about international islamicist terrorism. And here he is being diplomatic again. A non diplomatic statement without velvet gloves would have been: Neither we nor the people of the Levantine or the people of Europe need to coorporate with those states that have created this terrorism, which would be the USA, Israel and the AngloZionists, the UK, Saudi Arabia and its cucksucking Emirates - and Turkey. And if we go back to the Libyan war, this would include France as well. So here we have the global terror-axis-of-evil. Lavrov didn't say that, but his boss, Putin, has stated something similar to that in the recent years. Remember again, that Russia has chosen to play by the book of international treaties and written-down rules of behaviour for states, which its hypocratic opponents are violating every time, they have a chance. Confront your enimy, don't become your enimy.

Reality is different (than what is said about it). The West comes to us for help much more often, than we come to the West. As a response to Western sanctions, we are striving now to be self sufficient and promote import substitutions.

We are not trying to cut ourselves off from the World, we are ready for coorporation as long as it is based on equality.

Meaning: the West will not be allowed to use the Ukraine as a stepping stone for Russia itself. May we remind ourselves of the history of the last 25 years. Since the Fall of the Wall and the Sovjet Union, the West – that is the USA and the banking cartels of Wall Street – has strived to redefine the Russian de-sovjetizedculture and deprive the Russian people their right to self-redefinition. This started with the era of vodka-addict and red nosed clown Boris Jeltsin. As former top investment banker, Mads Palsvig, brilliantly pointed out at his speech in Copenhagen jan. 26th, that the Western banksters and their puppet politicians in and outside Russia managed to make a perversion coup of the Russian constitution, forbidding Bank of Russia to buy bonds in Russian rubles! It is unheard-of monetarian imperialism that a sovereign country by its own constitution is not allowed to use its own currency! There is apparently a Fifth Column of Western infiltrators embedded deeply into Russian central banking system. In the years after the CIA-Jeltsin era, we saw a Russia still too weak to oppose the West and claim real sovereignty. Only when Vladimir Putin kicked the butt on Jeltsin, change started to happen. We also saw some severe butt-kicking on greedy oligarks and the emancipation of Russian oil- and gas companies from Western grip. Till then they had stolen all Russian oil without paying for it.

I am a banker. I would know.

So, apparently the capturing of the Russian 'national' bank – not unsurprisingly nothing like national but a Rothschild globalist vehicle like any other central bank in the world (including the Danish Nationalbanken) – is still continuing. Mr. Putin has tried several times to nationalize it, but the corrupt elements of the Duma has prevented it.

In that sense, the Ukraine take-over is a variation of the colored revolutions strategy of destabilisation and balkanisation (a Kissinger motto). A destabilised country is an easy drive-through for the Empire. When a country is eaten up from inside by internal ethnic, political, ideological conflicts, the tanksters and the banksters just roll in and through.

But both in the Ukraine and in Syria, Russia has been able to draw a line in the soil and the sand making a mockery of the Obama rhetoric using the same vocabularies. And the recent speech for Sergey Lavrov, blackout'ed and ignored by the Corporate Fascist Media of the entire West, points it out: No more business as usual.

Any state, super state, state system, organisation, federation, ideology, strategy ... whatever, that is unable to adapt to reality, has written its own death sentence and digged its own grave. Requiem Aeternam, may it rest in peace.