You May Not Know ... ?

by morton_h, the blogger 

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that multinationals pay more in salaries to their CEO's than they pay in taxes in the countries where they operate?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that if the multinationals just paid 1% of company tax in the countries where they operate, no citizen of these countries would ever have to pay income tax? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that income tax is an illegitimate extension of war tax into peacetime which is an invention of the European central banks in the 1800s?Did you know that a National Bank, also called a Central Bank is a private company that has earned the privilege = the exclusive right to print money and lend it to the State, whereby the notion of sovereign debt has arisen?

 YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the five countries that George W. Bush called the 'Axis of Evil', were the last five countries in the world that did not have a central bank as described above, but claimed the right of a true national bank controlled by its State?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the leaders of these countries, two of them murdered by the US, were of the outspoken opinion, that they were ready to sell oil without using US Dollar? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that American taxpayers pay more than 53% of the countrys non-constitutionally approved income tax for warfare?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that 53% is far from enough to pay for America's wars why they have to provide the rest by other kinds of financial fraud and by practicing the world's most profitable business: drug trafficking with the CIA and NATO network as drug dealers and traffickers?

 YOU MAY NOT KNOWYOU MAY NOT KNOW that the British royal family's vaste fortunes is derived from drug trafficking, human trafficking and organized worldwide piracy? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that drug trafficking was one of the main reasons for the US presence in Central America, The Golden Triangle and Afghanistan / Pakistan?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW the number of drug addicts in the Western world is identical to the customer base for this ugly business case?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that Bill Clinton and George Bush Senior was personnally involved and proven instrumental to extensive CIA-organized drug transports and subsequent money-laundry between Central America and the Mena, Arkansas?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that it was Bill Clintons repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act (the mandatory separation of venture capitalism and private banking after the banker-manipulated Wall Street Crack in 1929)) in the late 1980s that made the derivative scam and Financial Crisis in 2008 possible? 

Could we say - I am asking - that this photo tells the essential story of corrupt politicians buying themeselves one decade of doubtful fame and glory, while the bankers clapping their greedy hands, are buying themselves five more decades of government protection from being hung from a lamppost by a huge angry mob of people, who's wealth they stole and who's life they destroyed. Just asking.

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that a NATO general in the 90s was arrested by Dutch police with secure evidence of drug-related money laundry in the order of 25 billion $, spend a month in jail for it, and then suddenly he was released and unabashedly continued his military career?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that George Bush Senior is the American president who through his network is associated with the most political / financial assassination in American history? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that a similar masonic network associated to the British King Edward VII assassinated more than 20 heads of state in the Western sphere of influence between 1894 and the outbreak of World War 1?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that three World Wars were predicted iand precisely described n the late 1800s by the leader of the masonic network, Albert Pike, and that the third World War was to be between the West and Islam leading to the extermination of Christianity and the formation of a World Government controlled by this network? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the United States has been involved in more than 100 acts of war since WW2, and that none of them have been declared wars? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that according to the US Constitution is illegal for the country to go to war with any nation on the planet unless directly attacked or having received received declaration of war? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that Denmark has attended five of these non-declared wars in which the United States has not been attacked based solely on our binding alliance with the US through NATO? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that in several of these wars with the Danish approval (no protest is obviously equal to approval) there has been used strategic nuclear weapons (eg. Yoguslavia, Iraq, Libya and Syria) with incalculable and long-lasting damage to the civilian population in the form of cancer and deformed children? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that in addition to strategic nuclear weapons with depleted uranium there has been used a number of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction also with Danish non-protesting consensus thus making the Danish population co-responsible of severe war crimes?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the British bombing of Germany during WW2 exclusively directed against the civilian population by night raids, and that this too was used chemical weapons? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the British as late as the 1990s found it necessary to adopt a law that stated that only the Germans committed war crimes during World War 2?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that in the prison camps in Rhine Delta over 1 million German prisoners of war died of starvation, even though there were no food shortages, disease, although there was no drug shortages and lack of shelter for a month, though there was no shortage of tents - all under privy responsibility and full knowledge of US president Roosevelt and general Eisenhower?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW EITHER that the official death toll of Jews in the German prison camps has now fallen to 1.1 million of due historian and curator of the Auschwitz Museum, Franciszek Piper's research? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the same Franciszek Piper openly state that the alleged gas chamber at the former prison camp is a so-called 'reconstruction' and that Cyclone-B pesticide gas was intended to combat the worst killer of all wars, typhoid fever, caused by the British and American bombardments against civilians and destruction of the German infrastructure?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the information on homicidal exterminations of people including Jews in the German prison camps exclusively from Bolshevik commissioners in connection with the Nürmberg trials since no allies were given access to the camps until after the process? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the Bolshevik commissioners murdered 10 million Russians during the Russian Revolution, and later under Stalin murdered 40 million Russians, Germans and various ethnic groups in the Soviet Union? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the Bolsheviks alone in East Prussia performed mass rape of two million German women?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the incident of the 20,000 Polish reserve officers who were executed in Katyn Forest at Smolensk by the Bolsheviks and their Commissioners were attempted lubricated by the Nazis, and that the Allies by their intelligens services had full knowledge beforehand?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the incidents that brought the United States into the two world wars: the sinking of the Lusitania and the attack on Pearl Harbor, were events of staged self mutilation organized by the Transatlantic Elite, and that both incidents and their connection to the respective governments and their former state leaders are fully documented and even granted under the table? 

YOU ALSO MAY NOT KNOW that the Spanish-American War, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, the Iraq war, the Libya War, the Syria War, the Ukraine War and numerous other wars with US involvement have been arranged in the exact same way of staging an act of self mutilation also known in standard military strategy as Stand-down Operation False Flag? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that 90% of the acts of terror / terrorism that we world seen after the 2nd World War, have left fully identifiable prints of government participation and organization? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the fascist post-WW2-terrorist groups / actions in Europe and Turkey and recent Islamist terrorist groups in the Middle East, Central Asia, Africa and Near East are all have been financed and organized by the CIA / US / NATO Saud in Arabia, Israel and England?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the so-called 'colored revolutions', described as a spontaneous popular uprisings against so-called undemocratic regimes are all CIA operations copied from a manual produced during the Bosnia / Serbia war in the early 90s? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that a majority of NGO organizations that claim to perform humanitarian work in the parts of the world where terror, US invasions and colored revolutions are taking place, all are infiltrated by the CIA and funded by organizations that are front organizations for either the CIA and / or the world Zionist network?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the World Zionist network has claimed responsibility – and have taken pride in it - to have involved the United States in two world wars? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the World Zionist network branch in Palestine was as a terrorist organization and today as the deep state of Israel conducts the most extensive terrorism in the world?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that almost all of the US congress and senate members are on the World Zionist Network payroll - and that those who temporarily escapes network corruption, rarely expect a career as a politician in the long term?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that all the mainstream media network in the United States and England and a dominant part in Canada, Australia and New Zealand has an ownership, pointing back to the World Zionist network? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the culture-industrial phenomenon Hollywood is formed, owned, operated and harvested by the World Zionist network, and the basis of its cultural dominance has its premise in Germany and the German film industry from the film's childhood in the beginning of the last century?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the former lead of the European film industry was taken over by Hollywood after World War 1, since Europe and ITS film industry basically was ruinded after the war? 

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that this culture-industrial phenomenon has had a greater influence on the formation of the consciousness of mainly Westerners and secondarily all other peoples in the world and thereby the forming of world history of the last century - than any other similar cultural phenomenon?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the same ownership and domination can be observed in the financial cartels with headquarters in The City of London and Wall Street?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that the philosophy and rollout strategy behind the agenda for ownership and dominance relations was developed by an institute in Germany called the Frankfurt School, whose main product / ideology is Cultural Marxism, and whose by-product in the second half of the 20th Century> the 21st century is a social-psychological weapon of mass destruction by the name of Political Correctness?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that Political Correctness is the main component of one of the school's creations, the UN Promoted Agenda 21, whose main purpose is to expel people from rural areas to enable them to clump tightly together in strictly controlled metropol prison camps, where any individuality and personal sovereignty can been deprived them?

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that Political Correctness is composed of an ancient technique of social-mental control, which is a main component in the three Abrahamic religious circles (Judaism, Christianity, Islam): guilt, shame and fear?

YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED that guilt - also called debt - combined with fear is the original common denominator of religion and banking?BUT DIT YOU NOTICE that the foundation of both religion and banking is the practice of Black Magic - definition: radical manipulation of reality whereby people confuse fiction with non-fiction and act upon it?

 _____________________________

This particular associative circle is complete. We can begin to understand why the multinationals pay higher salaries to their executives than they pay in taxes (the first question). But we can only understand the circle and the world by taking the entire detour around similar types of associative chains of questions that are proposed in this blogspot

What divides people in these times, is whether they are able to form this kind of associative circles of questions or not. It is also called 'Connecting The Dots'.

YOU MAY NOT KNOW that this is considered FORBIDDEN! by the global ruling elite.  I which case you are blessed. Keep up the good work.

Vidste du ... ?

Vidste du, at de multinationale firmaer betaler mere i løn til deres direktører, end de betaler i skat i de lande, hvor de opererer?

Vidste du også / heller ikke, at hvis de blot betalte 1% i firmaskat i de lande, hvor de opererer, så ville befolkningerne i disse lande ALDRIG have brug for at betale indkomstskat?

Vidste du, at indkomstskat er en forlængelse af krigsskat i fredstid og en opfindelse af de europæiske centralbanker i 1800-tallet?

Vidste du at en centralbank også kaldet en nationalbank – inklusive den danske Nationalbank – er et privat foretagende, der har opnået det privilegium at have eneret på at trykke penge og låne dem til Staten, hvorved begrebet statsgæld er opstået?

Vidste du, at de fem lande, som George W. Bush kaldte for 'ondskabens akse', var de sidste fem lande i verden, der endnu ikke havde en centralbank som ovenfor beskrevet men en ægte nationalbank styret af statenVidste du amerikanske skatteydere betaler mere end 53% af denne ulige / ikke-forfatningsgodkendte indkomstskat til krigsførelse?

Vidste du, at 53% langt fra er nok til betale for USA's krigsførelse, hvorfor de er nødt til at tjl at tjene resten ved verdens mest indbringende forretning: drughandel med CIA's og NATO's netværk som pushere og traffickere?

Vidste du, at den britiske kongefamilies unævnelige formuer stammer fra drughandel, menneskehandel og sørøveri?

Vidste du, at drughandel er en af hovedårsagerne til USA's tilstedeværelse i Mellemamerika, Den/ Gyldne Trekant og Afghanistan/Pakistan?

Vidste du i forlængelse af dette, at det antallet af narkomaner i den vestlige verden er identisk med kundegrundlaget for denne business case?

Vidste du, at Bill Clinton og George Bush Senior var aktivt (og dokumenteret) medvirkende til omfattende CIA-organiseret drugtransport og efterfølgende penge-vaskeri mellem Mellemamerika og Mena, Arkansas?

Vidste du, at en påfaldende stor del af de personer, der var involveret + de personer, der begyndte at stille spørgsmål desangående, begyndte at få en besynderlig trang til at begå selvmord?

Vidste du, at en NATO-general i 90'erne blev anholdt af hollandsk politi med sikre beviser for narkorelateret pengevaskeri i størrelsesordenen 25 mia. dollar og sad en måned i fængsel for det, hvorefter han pludselig blev løsladt og ufortrødent fortsatte sin militære karriere?

Vidste du, at George Bush Senior er den amerikanske præsident, der via sit netværk er associeret til de fleste politiske / finansielle mord i amerikansk historie?

Vidste du, at et lignende netværk associeret til den britiske konge Edward VII myrdede mere end 20 statsoverhoveder i den vestlige verdens indflydelsessfære mellem 1894 og udbruddet af 1. Verdenskrig?

Vidste du, at USA har været involveret i mere end 100 krigshandlinger siden 2. Verdenskrig, og at ingen af dem har været erklæret som krige?

Vidste du, at det ifølge den amerikanske forfatning er ulovligt for landet at gå i krig med nogen nation på kloden, medmindre landet direkte bliver angrebet med modtaget krigserklæring?

Vidste du, at Danmark har deltaget i fem af disse ikke-erklærede krige, hvor USA ikke er blevet angrebet, hvilket er sket uden at den danske befolkning har godkendt det - udelukkende baseret på vores forpligtende alliance med USA via NATO?

Vidste du, at der i flere af disse krige med danskernes godkendelse (ingen protest er selvsagt lig med godkendelse) er blevet anvendt strategiske atomvåben med uoverskuelige og langtidsvarende skade på civilbefolkningen i form af cancer og vanskabte børn?

Vidste du, at der udover strategiske atomvåben med afberiget uran (D.U., depleted uranium) er blevet brugt en række kemiske og biologiske masseødelæggelsesvåben ligeledes med danskernes godkendelse?

Vidste du, at de engelske bombardementer af Tyskland under 2. Verdenskrig udelukkende rettede sig mod civilbefolkningen ved natlige angreb, og at der også her blev brugt kemiske våben?

Vidste du, at englænderne så sent som i 1990'er fandt det nødvendigt at vedtage en lov, der fastslog, at det kun var tyskere, der begik krigsforbrydelser under 2. Verdenskrig?

Vidste du, at der i fangelejrene i Rhindeltaet døde over 1 million tyske krigsfanger af sult, selvom der ikke var fødevaremangel, af sygdom, selvom der ikke var medicinmangel og af mangel på tag over hovedet i en måned, selvom der ikke var mangel på telte – alt sammen under medvidende ansvar af Roosevelt og Eisenhover?

Vidste du også / heller ikke, at det officielle dødstal for jøder i de tyske fangelejre nu er faldet til 1.1 millioner af grundet historikeren og kuratoren for Auschwitz-museet, Franciszek Pipers forskning?

Vidste du, at samme Franciszek Piper åbent erklærer, at det fremviste gaskammer i den tidligere fangelejr er en såkaldt 'rekonstruktion' og at Cyklon-B-pesticidgas var beregnet til at bekæmpe den værste af alle krigssygdomme, tyfus, forårsaget af bombardementer mod civile og destruktion af infrastruktur?

Vidste du, at oplysningerne om gaskamre til udryddelser af mennesker inklusive jøder i de tyske fangelejre udelukkende stammer fra bolsjevikiske kommissærer i forbindelse med Nürmbergprocessen, da ingen allierede fik adgang til lejrene før efter processen?

Vidste du, at de bolsjevikiske kommissærer myrdede 10 millioner russere under den Russiske Revolution, og senere under Stalin myrdede 40 millioner russere, tyskere og diverse etniske grupper i det daværende Sovjetunionen?

Vidste du, at bolsjevikkerne alene i Østpreussen massevoldtog to millioner tyske kvinder?

Vidste du, at hændelsen om de 20.000 polske reserveofficerer, der blev henrettet i Katynskoven ved Smolensk af bolsjevikkerne og deres kommissærer, blev forsøgt smurt af på nazisterne og under fuldstændig viden og godkendelse fra de allierede?

Vidste du, at begge hændelser, der bragte USA ind i de to verdenskrige: sænkningen af Lusitania og angrebet på Pearl Harbor, var hændelser arrangeret af den Transatlantiske Elite, og at begge hændelser og deres forbindelse til de respektive regeringer og deres daværende statsledere er fuldt ud dokumenteret og endog indrømmet under bordet?

Vidste du også / heller ikke, at den Spansk-Amerikanske krig, Vietnamkrigen, Afghanistankrigen, Irakkrigen, Libyenkrigen, Syrienkrigen, Ukrainekrigen og en lang række andre krige alle med USA medvirken er arrangeret på samme vis efter samme model: et falsk flag?

Vidste du, at samtlige terrorhandlinger / terrorisme, som vi verden set efter 2. Verdenskrig, har et efterladt fuldt identificerbart aftryk af statslig medvirken og organisering?

Vidste du, at de fascistiske post-WW2-terrorgrupper / -aktioner i Europa og Tyrkiet og de senere islamistiske terrorgrupper i Mellemøsten, Centralasien, Afrika og Nærorienten alle sammen er finansieret og organiseret via CIA/USA/NATO, Saudiarabien, Israel og England?

Vidste du, at de såkaldt 'farvede revolutioner', der er beskrevet som spontane folkelige opstande mod såkaldt udemokratiske regimer, alle sammen er CIA-operationer kopieret fra en manual fremstillet under Bosnien/Serbien-krigen i starten af 90'erne?

Vidste du, at de NGO-organisationer, der hævdes at udføre humanitært arbejde i de dele af verden, hvor terror, USA-invasioner og farvede revolutioner finder sted, alle er infiltreret af CIA og finansieret af organisationer, som er frontorganisationer for enten CIA og/eller det zionistiske verdensnetværk?

Vidste du, at det zionistiske verdensnetværk har taget skylden – af dem selv kaldet æren – for at have involveret USA i to verdenskrige?

Vidste du, at det zionistiske verdensnetværk startede som en terrororganisation og i dag bedriver den mest omfattende terrorvirksomhed i verden?

Vidste du, at samtlige amerikanske kongres- og senatsmedlemmer er på det zionistiske verdensnetværks lønningsliste – og at dem, der midlertidig undviger netværkets korruption, kun sjældent kan forvente en karriere som politiker på sigt?

Vidste du, at samtlige mainstream-medie-netværk i USA og England og en dominerende del i Canada, Australien og New Zealand har et ejerforhold, der peger tilbage til det zionistiske verdensnetværk?

Vidste du, at det kultur-industrielle fænomen Hollywood er dannet, ejet, drevet og høstet af det zionistiske verdensnetværk, og grundlaget for dets kulturelle dominans har sin forudsætning i Tyskland og den tyske filmindustri fra filmens barndom siden forrige århundredskifte?

Vidste du, at dette kultur-industrielle fænomen har haft større indflydelse på dannelsen af bevidstheden hos primært vesterlændinge og sekundært alle andre -lændinge i verden - og dermed verdenshistorien - end noget andet lignende kulturfænomen?

Vidste du, at det samme ejerskabs- og dominansforhold kan observeres i de finans-karteller, der har hovedsæde i The City of London og Wall Street?

Vidste du, at filosofien bag og udrulnings-strategien bag agendaen for ejerskabs- og dominansforholdet er udviklet i et institut i Tyskland kaldet Frankfurterskolen, hvis hovedprodukt / ideologi er Kulturmarxismen, og hvis biprodukt i slutningen af det 20. århundrede > det 21 århundrede er det social-psykologiske masseødelæggelsesvåben ved navn politisk korrekthed?

Vidste du, at politisk korrekthed er hovedkomponenten i en af skolens frembringelser, den FN-promoverede Agenda 21, hvis hovedformål er at uddrive mennesker fra landdistrikterne, for at de kan klumpe samme i strengt kontrollerede urbane fangelejre, hvor enhver individualitet og personlig suverænitet er blevet frataget dem?

Vidste du, at politisk korrekthed består af en urgammel teknik for social-mental kontrol, som er en hoved-komponent i de tre Abrahamiske troskredse (Jødedom, Kristendom, Islam): skyld, skam og frygt?

Vidste du, at skyld – også kaldet gæld – kombineret med frygt er den oprindelige fællesnævner for religion og bankvæsen?

Vidste du, at fundamentet for både religion og bankvæsen er Udøvelsen af Sort Magi - definition: radikal manipulation af virkeligheden, så mennesker forveksler fiktion med non-fiktion og agerer derefter?

_____________________________

Hermed er cirklen sluttet. Vi kan begynde at forstå, hvorfor de multinationale firmaer betaler mere i løn til deres direktører, end de betaler i skat (det første spørgsmål). Menvi kan kun forstå cirklen og verden ved at tage hele omvejen omkring den type af associative kæder af spørgsmål, som er foreslået i denne blogspot

Det, der skiller folk i disse tider, er, hvorvidt de er i stand til at danne denne form for associative kæder af spørgsmål eller ej. 

Who are the Rulers of the World?

by morton_h, the blogger

'To identify your real ruler is simple. Just ask yourself who you are not allowed to criticize '

Voltaire

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]

Is it that simple? Let's see where the wise philosopher's guideline will take us.

Are you allowed to criticize politicians and government?
It happens all the time, even in the lame mainstream media. The seriousness and depth of the criticism is debatable, though.

Are you allowed to criticize the church?
The time is long past. And as long as they keep as low a profile as they do, no one will bother to criticize them anyway. Who cares?

Are you allowed to criticize the royal family?
The tabloid does it half of the time. The other half they simply adore them. It is almost trivial. It's not really critique most of the time, it's ridicule simly because these spoiled inbreeds are so ridiculous.

Are you allowed to criticize science?
It may well be that they are insulted and will talk down to you, but criticism is basically built into the scientific method as a constructive drice. There has though arrived a tendency towards dogmatism in science and politicized pseudoscience like in the climate fraud of manmade global warming. Here we see the fingerprint of the rulers, but not the rulers themselves.

Are you allowed to criticize the courts and the judiciary?
It may well be that you do not get this far if you do it, but I have not heard that you cannot do it. Not in this country anyway. I would not advise to critisize a judge, when you are sitting in the court though. There are other ways, I have been told.Are you allowed to criticize the bankers?
It is almost impossible to ignore, since their actions in the past ten years has been crying for criticism. It may well be that they are whimping, whining, threatening and lying to escape criticism, but the criticism – and a good reason for it! - is increasing every passing day. And you ain't seen nothing yet.

Are you allowed to criticize the media, aka the 4th power of the state?
Generally the answer is yes. You are, however, in an increasing risk of being exposed to a trend of new censorship for example of being deleted from a media blog or just being ignored. Freedom of speech still exists in basic, I mean I do write this blog, but if I comment on blogs in online-newspapers and call a spade for a spade adressing the ignorance, sloppyness, lazyness and lack of human courage in the media, I may very well be censored. So here we have a hint, but we are not close enough.

Now I'm running out of ideas, so I must try to go in a different direction. I have to be more specific, I have to get out in the corners.

Are you allowed to criticize your husband or your wife?
It happens all the time within the walls, and in a healthy relationship (apparently it should not be called marriage anymore) it is usually on the menu. But if you are general and goes public with it, it turns out that it's okay for women to criticize men, but the reverse is apparently not quite as good. If you criticize a Swedish feminist, so help you God! We are getting closer.

Are you allowed to criticize a negro?
Already in the way that the questions is posed, itwill be turned down. 'Negro' is a politically incorrect word, though it is Latin for 'black'. However, this applies only if you speak locally and as a contribution to an ethnic debate. If you on the other hand criticize an African president you you as citicen in the Western World for political purposes are told not to like, it is perfectly OK. Someone has induced a debate agenda with baked in 'political correctness', we are getting there, definitely.

Are you allowed to criticize immigrants?
Here there are different views. If you are in the middle political spectrum, so it depends on the context. If you are located to the right of it, then the answer may be yes. If you are on the left, the answer may well be no. A devout socialist political fundamentalist opinion here will not react before someone starts to promote clitoris circumsision, daughters murder and burqa-order - because it is just a little too unattractive - but otherwise you can easily be touted etnogyn / a hater of strangers for questioning the benefits – and the purposes! - of mass immigration and multi culturalism. We are approaching again a taboo subject and thus anything that has to do with what and who exists in this world. But it's still a little hazy as to what this / these are.

Do you criticize sexual minorities?
You may actually prefer not to, because it is considered by now politically incorrect. Gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transvestites from being persecuted minorities now almost achieve status as untouchables. I seems to be part of a not articulated agenda, that boys should act like girls and girls like boys. The efeminization of men, the masculinisation of women. We find it social, cultural, psychological and chemical.

Either I'm now a little bit confused, or I begin to recognize a pattern. The old institutions of power you can very well criticize, ergo it is not here, we shall find that the world's real rulers. However, there are a number of groups in society who we are not supposed to critisize. This is where the confusion sets in, for none of these groups resemble the actual rulers of this world. So there is the invisible hand that operates using commands and prohibitions, for whom political correctness is an operating system, and for whom these not-allowed-to-critisize groups is a tool - not an end.

Maybe I should try to go higher in the system. Maybe I should go 'deep state'.

Do you criticize the Bilderberg Group or Council on Foreign Relations? What about the CIA, the Trilateral Commission, the EU, the Catholic Church, the Mormons, the freemasons, NATO?
As far as I can see, you can just criticize as you wish. They will probably safely shake all criticism of themselves because they feel high above and too big to critisize. And then you will predictably and per automatic called 'conspiracy theorist', bagatellized and ridiculed.

It's too easy to criticize the Nazis, fascists, capitalists, Maoists, pedophilia residues Satanists. Everyone agrees, more or less.

Now I'm really running out, so I try just one last chance.

Are you allowed to criticize a jew?
Deep silence ... what did you say there? You're an anti-Semite! And without any discussion you are hereby someone who believes that the Holocaust did not take place, and so do you think that Israel should be obliterated and in fact you are a racist, a Nazi, and even worse Do not think you can get away with criticizing anything here? We have various means!

Calm down, what happened? There is no need to operate above. I merely suggested that some might think that a certain Jewish financial company for the moment is buying the world for money, which among other things has served on dubious derivatives and a series of other big-scale funny-papers perhaps should not be allowed to buy into the the Danish energy sector.

I also just suggested that I was concerned that 90% of the U.S. Senate and Congress politicians received bribes from Jewish money tanks, and the United States since the 70s doing foreign policy for the exclusive benefit of Israel's aggressive behavior towards their neighbors. And that USA can no longer - for the same reason - considered to be a democracy.

I suggested then that I found it unfortunate that Danish policy is now designed to follow this non-democracy in its wars of aggression against nations that we have never had a quarrel with. Countries that strangely enough place themselves in a circle structure around the State of Israel.

I hinted of course - but it's no secret - that the most consciousness-forming enterprise in the whole world, Hollywood, is run solely by Jews. One of the best and more intelligent actors of the World, Gary Oldman, recently uttered bluntly what all people with a brainknow. Then of course barrels full of shit poured down over his ears, because you can know it - you just do not say it!

I also suggested only that it was remarkable that the largest banking families in the world bare Jewish names and their investments have helped to finance two world wars and an almost unspeakable number of 'smaller' wars in the twentieth century. And hat this hint can be fully documented.

I hinted moreover, that I found it disturbing that the leaders of the state of Israel - backed by the worst types of American politics and administration - right now are shouting loudly about bombing Iran, with a guaranteed results in another world war.

I also understand that you feel offended by my previous blog, It was Not In The History Books (not translated), describing the rise of Nazism in the events during and after the Jewish-Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, where 10 million Russians were murdered during the revolution by these Boklsheviks - AND the reaction, it spawned among the Germans as these Jewish-Bolsheviks tried to export their 'Holocaust' - because that it was! - to Bavaria / Munich in 1919. The fact that some very shady characters in Germany, eg. Rudolph Hess, during the following decades managed to exploit the Germans' legitimate reaction to the fullest for their own purposes, that we do not disagree on.

I have previously suggested that there was a direct link between the great Jewish financial families and the cash that went to stage the Jewish-Bolshevik revolution. Prof. Anthony Sutton did not merely suggest it, he justified it by crawling though all financial transactions before-during-after the revolution - follow the money + who benefits? ... He documented further that these 'gentlemen' as usual supported both sides by spitting just as much money in the Nazis as in the Communists. This implies also a far more complex and intertwined relationship between Zionism, Nazism, Communism - and war as general phenomenon! - than mainstream historiography has given us. Just to mention one of the family businesses with a jewish name: Rockefeller. And while we're at it, the same family is closely tied into the filthy mindset of eugenics. They funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin where the nazis conducted their race hygenics.

I have already more than hinted that the very concept of the Holocaust has been shamefully captured so to ONLY include 5 million Jews, while the conservative and prudent estimate of the actual Holocaust is 250 million Citizens of the World, at least! They were deliberately exterminated in the 20th century wars and 'social experiments', meaning that the real Holocaust was totally overshadowed. This is a huge proportion distortion caused by the tenacious ethnocentric campaign of Zionists / Jews for more than half a century.

But since you now seem to feel so taken that you're overreacting, let's just dwell on the abusive firing of a specific term, which appears to have been a cast spell to shut down all criticism. If justified criticism of bad behavior can give rise to the term anti-semite, then I'd like to know what a systemically suppressed and practiced hatred of half a billion Arabic-speaking people from North Africa to Central Asia - that is, people with a Semitic language - should be called? You only have to mention what is going on in the Gaza strip right now. Would that be the jewish version of Auschwitz?

I could also mention the way the 'big Jews' through thousands of years of history have dealt with the 'little Jews'. The story goes back a long way, and few people who call themselves Jews know it. The Alexandrian wealthy Jews entered in the 1st century into a joint agreement with the Romans to finance their destruction and plunder of Judea and break the messianic movement, that in fact was so successful that they had spread to Egypt at that time. As a sop, they were given Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity - an antimessianic, passifist slave philosophy. And the later powerful rabbis perform the same trick with the update of the Roman Empire, the Nazi Empire, that is, by making a similar agreement with Hitler. He was allowed to gas a lot of 'Little Jews' and destroy the resistance in Hungary against the creation of a new state of Israel. Nazism and Zionism were linked together from the beginning.

Both events are extremely underexposed, they are almost entirely absent in the history books. The big Jews repeatedly smashed the small jews. This gives the word anti-Semite a particularly perverted twist.

If you still have a bad feeling of automatic anti-judaism, maybe you should take a chat with the other writer on the blog, Chaos Navigator. The man is jewish.

----------------

In case of doubt, this 'You'-conversation is fictional. No jew was hurt in this film (as they were by world history). But all the components have evolved in conversations with Jews, and the first dates back to the 70s from a long stay in Israel. It must be said that their responses were not always quite as perfidious as above, as they often were friendly, albeit passionate people, that I sat at the table with. You can discuss with passion without hatred – ever heard about that? But if you study the perfidious exchanges of opinion that take place in the larger global space where a lot is at stake, it is by no means exaggerated. On the contrary.

All of a sudden some pieces of the jigsaw-puzzle fall in place dealing with the entire range of these taboos and political correctness'es wrapping up all the 'poor persecuted minorities'. There appear to be a multi-pronged harness that we have inflicted in the Western world, where the idea is that we constantly need to censor ourselves and load ourselves with shame and guilt and fear.

And where did this phenomenon occur? It strains its troth from the Jewish-dominated and highly influential Frankfurter School, where the cultural Marxists, the Jewish Bolsheviks heirs, by the minority groups had been looking for the new revolutionary potential overthrow of Western civilization, since the working class had failed to fulfilll, what Karl Marx had prophezised. I mean, marxism was basically stone dead in the 50'ies when they reinvented it. If that sounds like a twisted mind, read their writings, for it is exactly what they describe.

Political correctness is, in other words, the new operating system, the 'harness', the new designer ideology, that the rulers of this world have developed for their slaves. This is where one of the paradoxes becomes visible. The main paradigm og dogma of the Frankfurt School was 'criticism', Critisism is our goal! We may very well call the members of the school pseudo-philosophers due to their coup one of the core words of European philosophy, criticism(see, for example, Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason', etc.). They worked diligently to criticize Western culture to pieces. The paradox arrived when they themselves were exposed to criticism, for they could not endure. I remember discussions with cultural marxists in the academic world in the '80s, where you had the weird feeling of discussing with members of Jehovah's Witnesses, meaning it was not really a debate, but a kind of dogmatic, semi-religious exercise in throwing tomatos. They were not debating, they were preaching. And then this strange phenomenon had already been going on for 20 years.

The absurd notion field, that the toxic political correctness wave has created, is filled with double standard. Our interview forms have been poisoned to a degree, so that real conversation is almost impossible. Actual knowledge and opinion often does not take place in a constructive manner. The masters of the world simply fear the potential outcome of such conversations.

May I suggest a small simple stunt to counter these selfproclaimed supremacists political correctness. They have turned certain concepts upside down, but their newspeak twist on the concept of anti-Semitecoupled with the term racistis extremely fragile and super easy to peel apart. The Jewish self-understanding when it comes to their surroundings, is quite simply deeply cultural-racist and anti-Semitic. Let us return this concept every time a jew takes it in his mouth. Yes, let's unsolicited begin to call them racists and anti-Semites - even if the word racist is actually nonsense, because it has nothing to do with race, it is purely tribal-egoistic ideology.

Is the word anti-Semitic also nonsense? Not really, 95% of Jews are not at Jews all if you take Jewish inheritance philosopy as litterally as they do themselves. They are descendants of the Khazars, who 1300 years ago suddently converted by conveniance to Judaism at the command of their king. This was solely to avoid inclusion in the Turkish khalifat. So here we have millions of people who had nothing to do with Jews, that from one day to the next trained a new outfit for the occasion, a mere disguise. Their descendants are known today as the so-called Azkenazim Jews. They did not speak Hebrew, but Yiddish and their ancestors did not come from the Middle East. They could have been Jews from planet Mars.

These people did a grand-scale ethnic coup and created what is today understood as Jewish identity and the Jewish people. As an intellecual scholarly Jew Schlomo Sand, history professor at Tel Aviv University, says: the Jewish people does not exist, it is a Zionist construction.

The post Khazarian pseudo-Jews or crypto-Jews may feel free to hate Semites not being Semites themselves. Remember still that the term is not a race or a people, it is a term for a language subgroup, not a tribe. Assyrian, Phoenician, Maltese, Arab, Aramaeic, all these living or historical languages representing people in the area was called Semitic by linguists in the 19th hundred. 



All I Want for Christmas ...

Conclusion
Let's puncture the rulers verbal abuse and newspeak and call them what they are: racistsand anti-Semites. Give them a shot of political correctness and let them taste their own medicine. But do not do like them and do not let these concepts become mere cliches. Know why you use them. Don't use the dark force.

Let us also by their own invention, psychology, identify psychopathic traits in their victimhood and staged culture. Let's psychoanalyze their desire to project their own traumatized mindset onto others. Zionism may well be called an elitist update of the Old Testamental jahwist thinking, which is is a deeply psychopathic-racial tribal ideology in which ALL other people(s) of this world, the Goyim, is considered inferior and therefore really deserve to ... die! If in doubt again, read the Old Testament. It is racism with a vengeance, but also an expression of general human hatred. Double standards are thick as congealed cement here. While those with Frankfurt School political correctness as a springboard constantly accuse other people of 'hate speech' these days whenever serious criticism arrises, their own mention of humanity is one big hate speech.

We say thus Thank You to Voltaire for lending us his glasses and giving us a simple tool to spot the rulers of this world. But perhaps they are not the rulers, when it comes down to it. Maybe they are still just wannabes among other wannabes with a ancient wet dream ...

 Hvor findes denne verdens herskere?

'At finde ud af, hvem der er din egentlige hersker, er simpelt. Du skal blot spørge dig selv om, hvem du ikke har lov til at kritisere'

Voltaire

Er det så simpelt? Lad os se, hvor den viise filosofs rettesnor fører os hen.

Må du ikke kritisere politikere og regering?

Det sker hele tiden, selv i de bovlamme mainstream-medier. Seriøsiteten og dybden af kritikken kan diskuteres.

Må du ikke kritisere kirken?

Den tid er for længst forbi. Og så længe, de holder så lav profil, som de gør, er der ingen der gider at kritisere dem alligevel.

Må du ikke kritisere kongehuset?

Ekstrabladet bestiller ikke andet. Det er nærmest trivielt.

Må du ikke kritisere videnskaben?

Det kan godt være, de bliver fornærmede og taler ned til dig, men kritik er sådan set indbygget i den videnskabelige metode.

Må du ikke kritisere domstole og retsvæsen?

Det kan godt være, du ikke kommer så langt, hvis du gør det, men jeg har ikke hørt om, at du ikke kan gøre det. Ikke her til lands i hvert fald.

Må man ikke kritisere bankmændene?

Det er nærmest umuligt at komme udenom, da deres handlinger i de seneste 10 år har skreget på kritik. Det kan godt være, de klynker, truer og lyver for at slippe for kritik, men kritikken er stigende for hver dag, der går. And you ain't seen nothing yet.

Må du ikke kritisere medierne, alias den 4. statsmagt?

Generelt er svaret jo, det kan du godt. Du kan dog i stigende grad risikere at blive udsat for ny-censur ved fx at blive slettet fra en medieblog eller bare blive ignoreret. Ytringsfrihed findes stadig, jeg skriver fx denne blog, men er udsat for en udhulning. Så her har vi en snert, tampen brænder, men vi er ikke tæt nok på.

–-------------------

Nu er jeg ved at løbe tør for ideer, så jeg må prøve at gå i en anden retning. Jeg må blive mere specifik, jeg må ud i krogene.

Må du kritisere din mand eller din kone?

Det sker hele tiden inden for murene, og i et sundt parforhold (det må helst ikke hedde ægteskab længere) står det som regel på dagsordenen. Men hvis du bliver generel og går offentlig med det, viser det sig, at det er i orden for kvinder at kritisere mænd, men det omvendte er tilsyneladende ikke helt så i orden. Hvis du kritiserer en svensk feminist, så hjælpe dig Gud! Tampen brænder.

Må du kritisere en neger?

Allerede i måden, der spørges på, vil der blive slået ned. 'Neger' er et politisk ukorrekt ord, selvom det er latinsk for 'sort'. Det gælder dog kun, hvis du udtaler sig lokalt og som et indlæg i en etnisk debat-sammenhæng. Hvis du derimod kritiserer en afrikansk præsident, som du ifølge opinionen i den vestlige verden ikke bør kunne lide, er det derimod helt OK. Nogen har sat en debat-dagsorden med målestokken 'politisk korrekthed', tampen brænder her, helt klart.

Jamen, må du så kritisere indvandrere?

Her findes der forskellige opfattelser. Hvis du befinder dig i det midterste politiske spektrum, så afhænger det af sammenhængen. Hvis du befinder dig til højre for det, så er svaret ja. Hvis du befinder dig på venstrefløjen, kan svaret meget vel være nej. En troende socialist med politiske superkorrekte og fundamentalistiske meninger her vil måske stå af, hvis nogen begynder at hylde klitorisomskærelse, døtremord og burka-påbud – for det er ligesom lidt for ucharmerende - men ellers kan du nemt blive udråbt til etnogyn/en fremmedhader. Vi nærmer os igen et tabuiseret emne og dermed også noget, der har at gøre med, hvad og hvem, der hersker i denne verden. Men det er stadig lidt tåget, hvad dette/disse er.

Må du kritisere seksuelle minoriteter?

Det må du faktisk helst ikke, for det regnes efterhånden for politisk ukorrekt. Bøsser, lesbiske, biseksuelle og transvestitter er fra at være forfulgte minoriteter nu ved at opnå en status som urørlige. Fra at have en legitim sag - jeg mener homoseksuelle blev dengang overfaldet og tævet i parker - har de taget deres sag langt, langt videre. Man kan mene langt ud i absurditeter. Hvorfor ønsker de fx. at staten skal blande sig i deres seksualitet ved at blåstemle den i form af ægteskaber, når de kunne have haft det privilegium at have det for sig selv - 'Mor og Far, sig at jeg er god nok, sig det ...'. Man krummer tæer.

Enten er jeg nu en lille smule forvirret, eller også begynder jeg at ane et mønster. De gamle magtinstitutioner kan man altså godt kritisere, ergo er det ikke hos dem, vi skal finde denne verdens egentlige herskere. Derimod er der en stribe grupper i samfundet, der helst ikke må kritiseres. Det er her forvirringen sætter ind, for ingen af disse grupper ligner denne verdens herskere. Nogen af dem kunne være wannebe-kandidater, for det er alle med lavt selvværd. Men nej, ikke rigtig. Der er altså en usynlig hånd, der opererer vha. påbud og forbud, for hvem politisk korrekthed er et styresystem, og for hvem disse in-kritisable grupper er et redskab – ikke et mål.

Måske skal jeg prøve at gå højere i systemet. Måske skal jeg gå 'deep state'.

Må man kritisere Bilderberg-gruppen eller Council of Foreign Relations? Hvad med CIA, Trilateral Commission, EU, Den Katolske Kirke, Mormonerne, NATO?

Så vidt jeg kan se, kan du bare kritisere løs. De ryster sikkert kritikken af sig, fordi de er højt hævet over den, too big to critisize. Og så bliver du forudsigeligt og pr. automatik kaldt 'konspirationsteoretiker'. Der er ellers nok at kritisere.

Det er for nemt at kritisere nazister, fascister, kapitalister, maoister, pædofilister, satanister. Alle er enige, stort set.

Nu er jeg virkelig ved at løbe tør, så jeg prøver lige en sidste mulighed.

Må du kritisere en jøde?

Et splitsekund af dyb tavshed … hvad sagde du lige dér? Du er jo anti-semit! Og så er du hermed en, der mener, at Holocaust ikke fandt sted, og så mener du at Israel skal udslettes og faktisk er du en racistisk nazist, ja du er! Du skal ikke tro, du kan slippe af sted med at kritisere noget her, for det vi midler til at sørge for! Vi kan fx. få dig smidt i fængsel i mindst otte år for blot at åbne munden!!

Rolig nu, hvad skete der lige? Der er ingen grund til at overeagere. Jeg antydede sådan set bare, at det jødiske finansforetagende, der i øjeblik er ved at opkøbe verden for penge, som de blandt andet har tjent på betænkelige derivater og en serie andre big-scale uigennemsigtigheder måske ikke burde have lov til at købe sig ind i den danske energisektor, fordi vi ikke blot mistænker, med VED, at de ikke har rent mel i posen.

Jeg antydede også blot, at jeg fandt det betænkeligt, at 90% af amerikanske senats- og kongrespolitikere modtog bestikkelse fra jødiske pengetanke, og at staten USA siden 70'erne har ført udenrigspolitik til eksklusiv gavn for Israels aggressive fremfærd mod deres naboer. Og at USA ikke længere – af samme grund – er at betragte som et demokrati.

Jeg antydede dernæst, at jeg fandt det uheldigt, at dansk politik nu er indrettet på at følge et ikke-demokrati i sine aggressionskrige mod nationer, som vi aldrig har haft et udestående med. Og som sjovt nok placerer sig i en cirkelstruktur rundt om staten Israel.

Jeg antydede selvfølgelig, men det er jo ingen hemmelighed, at det mest bevidsthedsdannende business-syndikat i i hele verden, Hollywood, er drevet af jøder. En af de bedste og mest intelligente skuespillere, Gary Oldman, sagde forleden ligeud det, som alle folk with a brain (hans udtryk) vidste. Der høvlede selvfølgelig tøndevis af lort ned over ørerne på ham, for man måtte gerne vide det, som alle vidste - man måtte bare ikke sige det!

Jeg antydede også kun, at det var bemærkelsesværdigt, at de største bankfamilier i verden bar jødiske navne, og at deres investeringer har været med til at finansiere to verdenskrige og et nærmest unævneligt antal 'mindre' krige i det tyvende århundrede, da deres mellemhandlere solgte våben i trilliardklassen til begge parter. Og at denne 'antydning' kan dokumenteres.

Jeg antydede i forlængelse heraf, at jeg fandt det foruroligende, at lederne af nationen Israel og bakket op af de værste typer i amerikansk politik og administration lige nu råber højlydt om at sønderbombe Iran, hvilket med garanti medfører endnu en verdenskrig. Disse typer, neocon-slænget er i øvrigt uddannet af filosoffen Leo Strauss, zionist og nazist på én gang, denne paradoksale cocktail, som kendetegner alle hans elever fra Chicago.

Jeg kan også forstå, at du føler dig stødt over, at det mere end antydes i min forrige blog, Det stod ikke i historiebøgerne, at nazismens fremkomst har sine rødder i hændelser under og efter den bolsjevikkisk-jødiske revolution i Rusland, hvor 10 millioner russere blev myrdet alene under revolutionen – OG den reaktion, det affødte hos tyskerne, da de forsøgte at eksportere dette 'Holocaust' – for det var nøjagtigt, hvad det var – til Bayern/München i 1919.

Jeg har tidligere antydet, at der var en direkte sammenhæng mellem de store jødiske finansfamilier og den pengestrøm, der gik til at iscenesætte den jødisk-bolsjevikkiske revolution, og at prof. Anthony Sutton ikke nøjedes med at antyde det. Han dokumenterede det ved at gennemtrevle alle finansielle transaktioner før-under-efter revolutionen - follow the money + who benefits...Han dokumenterede yderligere, at disse 'herrer' i vanlig stil støttede begge sider ved senere at spytte lige så store midler i nazisterne. Hermed antydes også et langt mere komplekst og sammenflettet forhold mellem zionisme-nazisme-kommunisme - og krig! - end mainstream-historieskrivning har givet os.

Jeg har tidligere mere end antydet, at selve begrebet Holocaust er blevet skammeligt kuppet af jøder til kun, gentager KUN at omfatte 6 millioner jøder, mens de konservativt og forsigtigt estimeret 250 millioner verdensborgere!, der bevidst blev udryddet i det 20. århundredes krige og sociale 'eksperimenter', det egentlige Holocaust, hermed ganske er overskygget. En kæmpe proportionsforvrængning forårsaget af den ihærdige etnocentriske kampagne, som zionister/jøder har ført i over et halvt århundrede. 

Jeg har i forlængelse af antydet, at jeg fandt det påfaldende - at der var en hel stribe intellektuelle røde lamper, der burde lyse - at alle vores oplysninger om det, der er blevet efterkrigstidens religion for de sekulære jøder (religion sniger sig altid ind ad bagdøren, hvis man tror, man har afskaffet den), deres hoveddogme: gasningen af 6 millioner jøder i den stribe koncentrationslejre, der lå i det senere russiske-dominerede område, især Polen, stammer fra to kilder, og to kilder udelukkende: Bolsjevikkerne og Hollywood. Og med kilder mener jeg ægte historiske kilder, ikke sladder-kilder, for selvfølgelig gentog de allierede historien med største fornøjelse. Vi har altså kun bolsjevikkernes/Stalin-kommunisternes ord for det. 

Jeg spørger dernæst: hvor pålidelige var de mon, altså bolsjevikkerne, stalinisterne? Har du et bud? Du kender måske svindelnummeret med Katynskoven, mordet på 20.000 polske officerer henrettet ved nakkeskud i en skov beliggende i nuværende Rusland, daværende Polen. Bolsjevikkerne åbnede massegravenene og smurte det straks af på nazisterne, men en egentlig historisk-videnskabelig undersøgelse viste, at det var russerne. I tilfældet gaskamrene fik ingen uafhængige undersøgelses-kommisioner lov til at tjekke oplysningerne. Og siden er det blevet forbudt at spørge: var det nu lige helt sådan, det var? I Tyskland fx. giver det 8 års fængsel blot at stille spørgsmålet. Selv en jødisk, amerikansk historiker, David Cole (Stein) blev truet på livet, da han satte sig ned i en årrække og gennemtrevlede dokumenter og interviewede folk i og omkring Auschwitz, Sobibor, Treblinka, Neungamme, osv. Han måtte gå under jorden for det, for den nye tids 'herrer' tillod ikke videnskab og historiske, fysiske fakta at blive lagt på bordet.

Men siden du nu tilsyneladende føler dig så truffet, at du overreagerer, så lad os lige dvæle et øjeblik ved det skældsord, du fyrer af, og som tilsyneladende er blevet trylleformularen for at lukke ned for al kritik. Hvis berettiget kritik af dårlig opførsel kan afføde betegnelsen anti-semit, så gad jeg nok vide, hvad et systemisk, indædt og praktiseret had til en halv milliard arabisktalende mennesker fra Nordafrika til Centralasien – altså folk tilhørende den semitiske sproggruppe – skal kaldes? Jeg behøver fx blot at sige Gaza, den zionistiske parallel til det, som man påstår, at Auschwitz stod for.

Jeg kunne også sige måden, de 'store jøder' har behandlet de 'små jøder' på. Historien går langt tilbage, og de færreste, der kalder sig jøder kender den. De alexandrinske hovedrige jøder indgik en fæl aftale med romerne om at finansiere deres destruktions- og plyndringstogt i Judæa for at smadre den messianske bevægelse, der var så succesfuld, at den nu bredte sig til Egypten. Som narresut fik jøderne først rabbinisk jødedom og efterfølgende kristendom - en antimessiansk, passifistisk slavefilosofi. Og minsandten om ikke de senere så magtfulde rabbinere laver det samme nummer med opdateringen af Romerriget, Det Fjerde Rige, altså ved at lave en lige så fæl aftale med Hitler. Han fik lov til at smadre modstanden i Ungarn mod, at der blev oprettet en ny stat i Israel. 

Begge hændelser er særdeles underbelyst, grænsende til fraværende, i historiebøgerne. De store jøder smadrede gang på gang de små. Det må siges at give ordet anti-semit en særlig perverteret drejning.

Og så skulle du måske tage en chat med den anden skribent på bloggen, ChaosNavigator. Manden er jøde.

–---------------

Skulle nogen være i tvivl, så er denne samtale fiktiv. Eftertekst: ingen jøde er kommet til skade i denne film (det er de til gengæld i verdenshistorien). Men alle komponenterne har fundet sted i samtaler med jøder, og de første stammer helt tilbage i 70'erne fra et længere ophold i Israel. Det skal dog siges, at deres reaktioner ikke altid var helt så perfide, som ovenfor, da de ofte var betænksomme, omend passionerede mennesker, som jeg sad til bords med. Men hvis man studerer de perfide meningsudvekslinger, der finder sted i det større, globale rum, hvor der er noget på spil, så er det på ingen måde overdrevet. Nærmest tværtimod.

Her falder der pludselig nogle brikker på plads i forhold til hele striben af ovennævnte tabuer omkring politisk korrekthed overfor alle de 'stakkels forfulgte minoriteter'. Der er tilsyneladende tale om et multistrenget 'seletøj', som vi bliver påført i den vestlige verden, hvor det er meningen, at vi konstant skal censurere os selv

Og hvor er dette fænomen opstået? Ja, det stammer såmænd fra den jødisk dominerede og meget indflydelsesrige Frankfurterskole, dette besynderlige intellektuelle efterkrigsfænomen, hvor kulturmarxisterne, de jødiske bolsjevikkers arvtagere, netop via minoritetsgrupperinger havde udset sig det nye revolutionerende potentiale til omstyrtelsen af den vestlige civilisation. Hvis det lyder som en syg tanke, så læs deres skrifter, for det er nøjagtigt, hvad de beskriver. Den uduelige arbejderklasse, som profeten Marx havde spået ville stoppe krigene og 'i alle lande forene sig', gik alligevel i krig i 1. Verdenskrig og skød på hinanden i kapitalisternes og burgeoisiets krig - for at holde det i deres terminologi. Derfor udtænkte disse pseudofilosoffer - de var egentlig blot intellektuelle ideologimagere - en ny plan: feministisk, etnicistisk og sexistisk revolution i det, der var deres ganske ublufærdigt erklærede mål: udslettelsen af den vestlige civilisation! 

Den jødiske ideolog, Herbert Marcuse, kaldte det for 'subversiv perversion'. Perverteringer skulle altså undergrave en hel kultur! Spørg lige, om alle disse tiltag blev realiseret? Svaret er, at samtlige programpunkter er implementeret, og kulturen, som vi kender den i Vesten, er nu domineret heraf.

Politisk korrekthed er med andre ord det nye styresystem, 'seletøjet', den nye designerideologi, som denne verdens herskere udviklede til deres slaver. Her kommer så et af paradokserne. Frankfurterskolens grundparadigme var 'kritik'. Her havde disse, skal vi kalde dem pseudofilosoffer kuppet et af kerneordene i den europæiske filosofi, kritik (jf. fx Kant's 'Kritik af den rene fornuft' o. lign). De arbejde flittigt på at kritisere den vestlige kultur sønder og sammen. Paradokset ankom, når de selv blev udsat for kritik, for de kunne de ikke døje, endsige tolerere, for tolerance var jo ikke ment som gensidig tolerance. Jeg husker tydeligt diskussioner med kulturmarxister i universitetsmiljøet i 80'erne, hvor man havde fornemmelsen af at diskutere med medlemmer af Jehovas Vidner eller en blanding af moonies og mormoner. Hvilket reelt aldrig var en diskussion, men en form for dogmatisk, semi-religiøs øvelse i pælesidning, kulturmarxisterne og deres studenter-horder var omdannet til omvandrende helvedesprædikanter. Og da havde fænomenet allerede stået på i 20 år.

Der er uendelig meget dobbeltmoral i det absurde begrebsfelt, som den toksiske politiske korrekthedsbølge har skabt. Vores samtaleformer er blevet forgiftede i en grad, så egentlig samtale er umuliggjort. Nogen ønsker simpelthen, at samtale, dvs. egentlig videns- og meningsudveksling, ikke finder sted på konstruktiv vis. De frygter simpelthen disse samtalers udkomme.

Må jeg foreslå et lille simpelt stunt til at modgå 'herskernes' politiske korrekthed. De har vendt begreberne på hovedet, men deres nysproglige twist på begrebet anti-semit koblet med begrebet racister alt for skrøbelig og superlet at pille fra hinanden. Den jødiske selvforståelse, når det handler om deres omverden, er ganske simpelthen dybt kultur-racistisk og anti-semitisk. Lad os returnere begrebet, hver eneste gang en jøde tager det i sin mund. Ja lad os uopfordret begynde at kalde dem for racister – selvom det er noget vrøvl, for det har intet med race at gøre, det er ren stamme-ideologi – og antisemitter.

Er det ikke også noget vrøvl? En semitisk antisemit? Overhovedet ikke, for 95% af jøder er overhovedet ikke jøder, arveteknisk set. De er efterkommere af khazarer, der for 1300 år siden bekvemmmelighedsomvendte sig til jødedommen efter befaling fra deres konge. Det skete for at undgå indlemmelse i det tyrkiske khalifat. Der var altså tale om millioner af mennesker, der intet havde med jøder at gøre, der fra den ene dag til den anden tog et nyt sæt tøj på til lejligheden, en forklædning. Deres efterkommere kendes i dag som de såkaldte azkenaziske jøder. De talte ikke hebraisk men jiddish, og der forfædre, eller rettere -mødre ifølge jødisk definition, kom ikke fra Mellemøsten.

Disse folk har kuppet og skabt, hvad der i dag forstås som jødisk identitet og 'det jødiske folk'. Som jøden Schlomo Sand, historieprofessor ved Tel Aviv Universitetet siger: det jødiske folk findes ikke, der er en zionistisk konstruktion.

Så post-khazarerne kan, synes de, kvit-og-frit storhade semitter. For de er jo ikke selv semitter. Husk stadigvæk, at semitter ikke er en race eller et folk, det er et begreb for en sprogstamme, ikke en folkestamme. Assyrere, fønikere, maltesere, arabere, aramæere, alle disse nulevende eller historiske folk var semitter rent sprogligt.

Konklusion: lad os prikke hul på herskernes verbal-misbrug og kalde dem det, de er: racister og anti-semitter. Giv dem en gang politisk korrekthed og lad dem smage deres egen medicin. Men lad være med at gøre som dem: lad ikke disse begreber blive til klicheer, og vid, hvorfor du bruger dem.

Lad os også via deres egen opfindelse, psykologien, identificere de psykopatiske træk i deres offerrolle og iscenesætterkultur. Lad dem smage deres egen medicin og lad os psykoanalysere deres trang til at projicere deres eget traumatiserede mindset over på andre. Zionismen, som vel må kaldes en elitær opdatering af den gammeltestamentlige, jahwistiske tankegang, er en dybt psykopatisk-racistisk stammeideologi, hvor ALLE andre i denne verden, Goyim, regnes for mindreværdige og derfor er modne til udslettelse! Er du i tvivl igen, så læs det Gamle Testamente. Det er både racistisk så det batter, og samtidig generelt menneskehadsk. Dobbeltmoralen er tyk som stivnet cement her, for mens de med Frankfurterpølsens politiske korrekthed som afsæt konstant beskylder folk for 'hate speech', hver gang der ankommer berettiget og seriøs kritik, så er deres omtale af menneskeheden nærmest én stor hate speech.

Vi siger hermed pænt til til Voltaire for at låne os sine briller og forære os et simpelt redskab til at spotte denne verdens herskere. Men måske de slet ikke er herskerne, når det kommer til stykket. Måske er de stadig bare wannabes blandt andre wannabes med en urgammmel våd drøm ...